Investigating Heterogeneity in Brand Preferences in Logit Models for Panel Data

In analyzing panel data, the issue of heterogeneity across households is an important consideration. If heterogeneity is present but is ignored in the analysis, it will result in biased and inconsistent estimates of the effects of marketing mix variables on brand choice. The authors propose the use of a random effects specification to account for heterogeneity in brand preferences across households in a logit framework. The model parameters are estimated by both parametric and semiparametric approaches. The authors also compare their results with those obtained from logit models in which observed past choice behavioir is used to capture such heterogeneity. The different models are estimated with the IRI saltine crackers dataset. A formal statistical test of the model specifications shows that the semiparametric specification is the most preferred in terms of the overall fit of the model to the data. In addition, that specification predicts best when the models are validated in a holdout sample of households.

[1]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Quality perceptions and asymmetric switching between brands , 1991 .

[2]  Naufel J. Vilcassim,et al.  Modeling Purchase-Timing and Brand-Switching Behavior Incorporating Explanatory Variables and Unobserved Heterogeneity , 1991 .

[3]  Naufel J. Vilcassim,et al.  Investigating Household Purchase Timing Decisions: A Conditional Hazard Function Approach , 1991 .

[4]  Greg M. Allenby.  Hypothesis Testing with Scanner Data: The Advantage of Bayesian Methods , 1990 .

[5]  Robert C. Blattberg,et al.  Price-Induced Patterns of Competition , 1989 .

[6]  V. S. Kudpi.  Incorporating heterogeneity in brand choice models for panel data , 1989 .

[7]  Sunil Gupta.  Impact of Sales Promotions on when, what, and how Much to Buy , 1988 .

[8]  Roger W. Klein,et al.  A Flexible Class of Discrete Choice Models , 1988 .

[9]  Joel H. Steckel,et al.  A Heterogeneous Conditional Logit Model of Choice , 1988 .

[10]  L. Krishnamurthi,et al.  A Model of Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Price Sensitivities , 1988 .

[11]  J. M. Jones,et al.  Removing Heterogeneity Bias from Logit Model Estimation , 1988 .

[12]  Lee G. Cooper,et al.  Market-Share Analysis , 1988 .

[13]  Cheng Hsiao,et al.  Analysis of Panel Data , 1987 .

[14]  Fred S. Zufryden.  Multibrand Transition Probabilities as a Function of Explanatory Variables: Estimation by a Least-Squares-Based Approach , 1986 .

[15]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[16]  J. Heckman,et al.  A Method for Minimizing the Impact of Distributional Assumptions in Econometric Models for Duration Data , 1984 .

[17]  Robert A. Moffitt,et al.  A COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT QUADRATURE PROCEDURE FOR THE ONE-FACTOR MULTINOMIAL PROBIT MODEL , 1982 .

[18]  Joel L. Horowitz,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF THE MULTINOMIAL LOGIT MODEL AS AN APPROXIMATION TO THE MULTINOMIAL PROBIT MODEL OF TRAVEL DEMAND , 1980 .

[19]  Tony Lancaster,et al.  ECONOMETRIC METHODS FOR THE DURATION OF UNEMPLOYMENT , 1979 .

[20]  Gary Chamberlain,et al.  Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data , 1979 .

[21]  Wilfred W. Recker,et al.  The Multinomial, Multiattribute Logit Choice Model , 1979 .

[22]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  Equilibrium Stochastic Choice and Market Penetration Theories: Derivations and Comparisons , 1976 .

[23]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  The Theory of Stochastic Preference and Brand Switching , 1974 .

[24]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .