Reflections on a Century of College Admissions Tests

The College Boards started as achievement tests designed to measure students’ mastery of college preparatory subjects. Admissions testing has significantly changed since then with the introduction of the Scholastic Aptitude Test, Lindquist’s creation of the ACT, renewed interest in subject-specific assessments, and current efforts to adapt K–12 standards-based tests for use in college admissions. We have come full circle to a renewed appreciation for the value of achievement tests. Curriculum-based achievement tests are more valid indicators of college readiness than other tests and have important incentive or signaling effects for K–12 schools as well: They help reinforce a rigorous academic curriculum and create better alignment of teaching, learning, and assessment along the pathway from high school to college.

[1]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Substituting SAT II: Subject Tests for SAT I: Reasoning Tests: Impact on Admitted Class Composition and Quality , 2003 .

[2]  D. Conley,et al.  Comparing State High School Assessments to Standards for Success in Entry-Level University Courses , 2007 .

[3]  Bruce G. Hammond.  Advancing beyond AP Courses. , 2008 .

[4]  Saul Geiser,et al.  The Role of Advanced Placement and Honors Courses in College Admissions. Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.4.04. , 2004 .

[5]  Glenn B. Milewski,et al.  The Utility of the SAT ® I and SAT II for Admissions Decisions in California and the Nation , 2002 .

[6]  P. Gándara,et al.  Expanding Opportunity in Higher Education: Leveraging Promise , 2006 .

[7]  Jennifer L. Kobrin,et al.  Test Development and Technical Information on the Writing Section of the SAT Reasoning Test , 2006 .

[8]  William G. Bowen,et al.  Crossing the Finish Line: Completing College at America’s Public Universities , 2017, Ever the Leader.

[9]  Andrea Venezia,et al.  From High School to College: Improving Opportunities for Success in Postsecondary Education. , 2004 .

[10]  Jennifer L. Kobrin,et al.  Validity of the SAT for Predicting First-Year College Grade Point Average , 2008 .

[11]  Educational Evaluation.  Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing , 1999 .

[12]  Shameem Nyla.  NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION , 2004 .

[13]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Standardized Tests And Access To American Universities , 2001 .

[14]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Subject Tests for SAT I: Reasoning Test: Impact on Admitted Class Composition and Quality , 2001 .

[15]  Shonna D. Waters,et al.  Does socioeconomic status explain the relationship between admissions tests and post-secondary academic performance? , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE CONTENT OF THE SAT , 2003 .

[17]  Saul Geiser,et al.  UC and the SAT: Predictive Validity and Differential Impact of the SAT I and SAT II at the University of California , 2001 .

[18]  Jesse Rothstein,et al.  College Performance Predictions and the SAT , 2004 .

[19]  Dale Trusheim,et al.  The Case against the SAT , 1988 .

[20]  Saul Geiser,et al.  Validity of High-School Grades in Predicting Student Success beyond the Freshman Year: High-School Record vs. Standardized Tests as Indicators of Four-Year College Outcomes. Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.6.07. , 2007 .

[21]  Rick Morgan,et al.  ANALYSES OF THE PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF THE SAT® AND HIGH SCHOOL GRADES FROM 1976 TO 1985 , 1989 .

[22]  Nicholas Lemann,et al.  The Big Test: The Secret History of the American Meritocracy , 1999 .

[23]  Gary Echternacht,et al.  The SAT ® I and High School Grades: Utility in Predicting Success in College , 2000 .

[24]  R. Zwick,et al.  California and the SAT: A Reanalysis of University of California Admissions Data. Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.8.04. , 2004 .

[25]  Nancy W. Burton,et al.  Predicting Success in College: SAT® Studies of Classes Graduating since 1980. Research Report No. 2001-2. , 2001 .

[26]  Saul Geiser.  Back to the Basics: In Defense of Achievement (and Achievement Tests) in College Admissions , 2008 .