What deep log analysis tells us about the impact of big deals: case study OhioLINK

– This article presents the early findings of an exploratory deep log analysis of journal usage on OhioLINK, conducted as part of the MaxData project funded by the US Institute of Museum and Library Services. OhioLINK, the original “big deal”, provides a single digital platform of nearly 6,000 full‐text journal for more than 600,000 people in the state of Ohio. The purpose of the paper is not only to present findings from the deep log analysis of journal usage on OhioLINK, but, arguably more importantly, to try test a new method of analysing online information user behaviour – deep log analysis., – The raw server logs were obtained for the period June 2004 to December 2004. For this exploratory study one month (October) of the on‐campus usage logs and seven months of the off‐campus transaction logs were analysed., – During this period approximately 1,215,000 items were viewed on campus in October 2004 and 1,894,000 items viewed off campus between June and December 2004. The paper presents a number of usage analyses including: number of journals used, titles of journals used, use over time, a returnee analysis and a special analysis of subject, date and method of access., – The research findings help libraries evaluate the efficiency of big deal and one‐stop shopping for scholarly journals and also investigate their users' information seeking behaviours., – The research is a part of efforts to test the applications of a new methodology, deep log analysis, for use and user studies. It also represents the most substantial independent analysis of, possibly, the most important and significant of the journal big deals ever conducted.

[1]  Hamid R. Jamali,et al.  The users of digital scholarly journals and their information seeking behavior: What usage data and deep log analysis can disclose , 2005 .

[2]  Thomas J. Sanville A method out of the madness: OhioLINK's collaborative response to the serials crisis , 2001 .

[3]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  An IP-level analysis of usage statistics for electronic journals in chemistry: Making inferences about user behavior , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Revisiting 'obsolescence' and journal article 'decay' through usage data: an analysis of digital journal use by year of publication , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[5]  Philip M. Davis Information-seeking behavior of chemists: A transaction log analysis of referral URLs , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Electronic journals and user behavior: A review of recent research , 2007 .

[7]  Carol Pitts Diedrichs E-journals: the OhioLINK experience , 2001 .

[8]  David Nicholas,et al.  Scholarly journal usage: the results of deep log analysis , 2005, J. Documentation.

[9]  Hamid R. Jamali,et al.  The Use, Users, and Role of Abstracts in the Digital Scholarly Environment , 2007 .

[10]  Paola Gargiulo Electronic journals and users: the CIBER experience in Italy , 2003 .

[11]  Eun-Ja Shin Analysis and Proposals Concerning Big Deals of Scholarly Journals , 2007 .

[12]  Marthyn Borghuis,et al.  Tulip: Final Report , 2002 .

[13]  Hamid R. Jamali,et al.  Diversity in the Information Seeking Behaviour of the Virtual Scholar: Institutional Comparisons , 2007 .

[14]  Ken Eason,et al.  The use and usefulness of functions in electronic journals: the experience of the SuperJournal Project , 2000 .

[15]  Thomas J. Sanville A Method Out of the Madness , 2001 .

[16]  Thomas Dowling OhioLINK—the Ohio library and information network , 1997 .

[17]  M. HamidR.Jamali,et al.  Website usage metrics: A re-assessment of session data , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[18]  David Nicholas,et al.  Electronic journals: are they really used? , 2006 .

[19]  David Nicholas,et al.  Evaluating consumer website logs: a case study of The Times/The Sunday Times website , 2000, J. Inf. Sci..

[20]  Mike McGrath,et al.  Interlending and document supply: a review of the recent literature – 57 , 2006 .

[21]  M. HamidR.Jamali,et al.  Characterising and evaluating information seeking behaviour in a digital environment: Spotlight on the 'bouncer' , 2007, Inf. Process. Manag..

[22]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  Patterns in Electronic Journal Usage: Challenging the Composition of Geographic Consortia , 2002 .

[23]  Ken Eason,et al.  Patterns of use of electronic journals , 2000, J. Documentation.