Effect of a FastSkin suit on submaximal freestyle swimming.

PURPOSE Nine male collegiate swimmers swam three 183-m freestyle trials at "moderate, moderately hard, and hard" paces while wearing a traditional brief-style suit and on another occasion while wearing a newly designed suit covering the torso and legs with a material designed to reduce drag (FS). METHODS Postswim blood lactate concentration, V0(2), and rating of perceived exertion were measured. Average stroke length and rate, and breakout distance were determined for each swimming trial. Passive drag and buoyant force were also determined on swimmers while wearing both suits. RESULTS Swimmers swam at a higher mean velocity while wearing the FS (pooled mean % difference = 2%), but this was accompanied by a significant increase in V0(2) (4% difference, P< 0.05) and blood lactate concentration (10% difference, P< 0.05). Comparison of physiological responses at standardized freestyle swimming speeds of 1.4 and 1.6 m.s revealed no significant difference between the two suit conditions. Passive drag of the swimmers while being towed was not significantly different between the suits. Swimmers were significantly more buoyant while wearing the brief-style suit than the FS suit (P< 0.05). CONCLUSION These findings provide no evidence of either physical or physiological benefits of wearing these suits during submaximal freestyle swimming.

[1]  R L Sharp,et al.  Influence of body hair removal on physiological responses during breaststroke swimming. , 1989, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  H M Toussaint,et al.  Effect of a triathlon wet suit on drag during swimming. , 1989, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  E. Burke,et al.  Physiological responses to swimming while wearing a wet suit. , 1996, International Journal of Sports Medicine.

[4]  David G. Lloyd,et al.  The effect of depth and velocity on drag in the streamlined glide , 1999 .

[5]  C Capelli,et al.  Bioenergetics and biomechanics of front crawl swimming. , 1995, Journal of applied physiology.

[6]  Huub M Toussaint,et al.  Swimming , 2002, Sports biomechanics.

[7]  R Fielding,et al.  Energy Expenditure During Front Crawl Swimming: Predicting Success in Middle-Distance Events , 1985, International journal of sports medicine.

[8]  D L Costill,et al.  Effect of swimming suit design on the energy demands of swimming. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  Richard N. Hinrichs,et al.  Buoyancy, Gender, and Swimming Performance , 2000 .

[10]  H M Toussaint,et al.  Active drag related to velocity in male and female swimmers. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  J. Chatard,et al.  Analysis of determinants of swimming economy in front crawl , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[12]  G. Borg,et al.  Perceived exertion: a note on "history" and methods. , 1973, Medicine and science in sports.

[13]  R. Hinrichs,et al.  Sex differences in the centre of buoyancy location of competitive swimmers. , 1998, Journal of sports sciences.

[14]  L. Cordain,et al.  Wetsuits, body density and swimming performance. , 1991, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[15]  R N Hinrichs,et al.  Influence of Arm Position and Lung Volume on the Center of Buoyancy of Competitive Swimmers , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[16]  A. Hackney,et al.  The Effect of Shaving Body Hair on the Physiological Cost of Freestyle Swimming. , 1988, The journal of swimming research.

[17]  S. Day,et al.  Do wet suits affect swimming speed? , 1986, British journal of sports medicine.

[18]  J. Chatard,et al.  Wet suit effect: a comparison between competitive swimmers and triathletes. , 1995, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.