Study of DXA-derived lateral–medial cortical bone thickness in assessing hip fracture risk

The currently available clinical tools have limited accuracy in predicting hip fracture risk in individuals. We investigated the possibility of using normalized cortical bone thickness (NCBT) estimated from the patient's hip DXA (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry) as an alternative predictor of hip fracture risk. Hip fracture risk index (HFRI) derived from subject-specific DXA-based finite element model was used as a guideline in constructing the mathematical expression of NCBT. We hypothesized that if NCBT has stronger correlations with HFRI than the single risk factors such as areal BMD (aBMD), then NCBT can be a better predictor. The hypothesis was studied using 210 clinical cases, including 60 hip fracture cases, obtained from the Manitoba Bone Mineral Density Database. The results showed that, in general HFRI has much stronger correlations with NCBT than any of the single risk factors; the strongest correlation was observed at the superior side of the narrowest femoral neck with r2 = 0.81 (p < 0.001), which is much higher than the correlation with femoral aBMD, r2 = 0.50 (p < 0.001). The capability of aBMD, NCBT, and HFRI in discriminating the hip fracture cases from the non-fracture ones, expressed as the area under the curve with 95% confidence interval, AUC (95% CI), is respectively 0.627 (0.593–0.657), 0.714 (0.644–0.784) and 0.839 (0.787–0.892). The short-term repeatability of aBMD, NCBT, and HFRI, measured by the coefficient of variation (CV, %), was found to be in the range of (0.64–1.22), (1.93–3.41), (3.10–4.16), respectively. We thus concluded that NCBT is potentially a better predictor of hip fracture risk.

[1]  J. Kanis,et al.  FRAX(®) Bone Mineral Density Task Force of the 2010 Joint International Society for Clinical Densitometry & International Osteoporosis Foundation Position Development Conference. , 2011, Journal of clinical densitometry.

[2]  C. Cooper,et al.  Hip fractures in the elderly: A world-wide projection , 1992, Osteoporosis International.

[3]  L. Melton,et al.  A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis. , 2008, Bone.

[4]  D. Cody,et al.  Short Term In Vivo Precision of Proximal Femoral Finite Element Modeling , 2000, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  P. Coyte,et al.  Current and projected rates of hip fracture in Canada. , 1997, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[6]  Songning Zhang,et al.  Examination of femoral-neck structure using finite element model and bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  C. Cann,et al.  Comparison of QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and T scores , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[8]  Matthew J Silva,et al.  Biomechanics of osteoporotic fractures. , 2007, Injury.

[9]  Steven K Boyd,et al.  Bone strength at the distal radius can be estimated from high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography and the finite element method. , 2008, Bone.

[10]  R. Eastell,et al.  Use of DXA‐based finite element analysis of the proximal femur in a longitudinal study of hip fracture , 2013, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[11]  R. Goeree,et al.  Economic Implications of Hip Fracture: Health Service Use, Institutional Care and Cost in Canada , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[12]  C. Cooper,et al.  Interpretation and use of FRAX in clinical practice , 2011, Osteoporosis International.

[13]  G. Niebur,et al.  Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  A. Díez-Pérez,et al.  Official Positions for FRAX® Bone Mineral Density and FRAX® simplification from Joint Official Positions Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX®. , 2011, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[15]  Christian M. Langton,et al.  Comparison of 3D finite element analysis derived stiffness and BMD to determine the failure load of the excised proximal femur. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[16]  E. McCloskey,et al.  FRAX(®) Clinical Task Force of the 2010 Joint International Society for Clinical Densitometry & International Osteoporosis Foundation Position Development Conference. , 2011, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[17]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  M. Viceconti,et al.  The human proximal femur behaves linearly elastic up to failure under physiological loading conditions. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  H. Skinner,et al.  Effect of force direction on femoral fracture load for two types of loading conditions , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[20]  F. Kainberger,et al.  A nonlinear QCT-based finite element model validation study for the human femur tested in two configurations in vitro. , 2013, Bone.

[21]  E. Fisher,et al.  Excess mortality following hip fracture: the role of underlying health status , 2007, Osteoporosis International.

[22]  Zohar Yosibash,et al.  Patient-specific finite element analysis of the human femur--a double-blinded biomechanical validation. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  A preliminary dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based finite element model for assessing osteoporotic hip fracture risk , 2011, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[24]  P. Dargent-Molina,et al.  Fracture risk prediction using BMD and clinical risk factors in early postmenopausal women: Sensitivity of the WHO FRAX tool , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[25]  O Johnell,et al.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. , 1996, BMJ.

[26]  W C Hayes,et al.  Fall direction, bone mineral density, and function: risk factors for hip fracture in frail nursing home elderly. , 1998, The American journal of medicine.

[27]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Cortical bone finite element models in the estimation of experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur. , 2012, Bone.

[28]  S. Jamal,et al.  Low bone mineral density and fracture burden in postmenopausal women , 2007, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[29]  M. V. Van Natta,et al.  Epidemiology of Hip Fractures Among the Elderly: Risk Factors for Fracture Type , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[30]  G Harry van Lenthe,et al.  Multi-level patient-specific modelling of the proximal femur. A promising tool to quantify the effect of osteoporosis treatment , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[31]  W. Hayes,et al.  Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part I--Linear analysis. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[32]  L. Melton,et al.  Hip fractures: a worldwide problem today and tomorrow. , 1993, Bone.

[33]  Dan Dragomir-Daescu,et al.  Validated finite element models of the proximal femur using two-dimensional projected geometry and bone density , 2011, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[34]  Wilma M Hopman,et al.  Prospective evaluation of preferences and quality of life in women with hip fractures. , 2005, The Journal of rheumatology.

[35]  E. Barrett-Connor,et al.  Hip fracture risk assessment using composite indices of femoral neck strength: the Rancho Bernardo study , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[36]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  T. Turmezei,et al.  Cortical Bone Assessed With Clinical Computed Tomography at the Proximal Femur , 2014, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[38]  S. Cummings,et al.  Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures , 2002, The Lancet.

[39]  Manabu Nankaku,et al.  Evaluation of hip fracture risk in relation to fall direction , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[40]  J H Keyak,et al.  Prediction of fracture location in the proximal femur using finite element models. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[41]  M. Jergas,et al.  Accurate assessment of precision errors: How to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[42]  S. Cummings,et al.  BMD at Multiple Sites and Risk of Fracture of Multiple Types: Long‐Term Results From the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[43]  Yunhua Luo,et al.  Precision study of DXA‐based patient‐specific finite element modeling for assessing hip fracture risk , 2013, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[44]  Eugene McCloskey,et al.  Independent clinical validation of a Canadian FRAX tool: Fracture prediction and model calibration , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[45]  R. Goeree,et al.  Mortality, Independence in Living, and Re-fracture, One Year Following Hip Fracture in Canadians , 2000 .

[46]  June-Huyck Hur,et al.  Assessment of Bone Quality using Finite Element Analysis Based upon Micro-CT Images , 2009, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[47]  J. Michelotti,et al.  Femoral Neck Length and Hip Fracture Risk , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[48]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Ct-based finite element models can be used to estimate experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur. , 2012, Bone.

[49]  David Christen,et al.  Multiscale modelling and nonlinear finite element analysis as clinical tools for the assessment of fracture risk , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[50]  T. Wilsgaard,et al.  Impacts of Body Mass Index, Physical Activity, and Smoking on Femoral Bone Loss: The Tromsø Study , 2014, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[51]  A. C. Taylor,et al.  Experimental validation of a finite element model of the proximal femur using digital image correlation and a composite bone model. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[52]  Lehana Thabane,et al.  Relation between fractures and mortality: results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[53]  A. Cappello,et al.  Risk of fracture in elderly patients: a new predictive index based on bone mineral density and finite element analysis. , 1999, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[54]  W. Jee,et al.  Integrated Bone Tissue Physiology: Anatomy and Physiology , 2001 .

[55]  Nancy Lane,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of the Proximal Femur and Hip Fracture Risk in Older Men , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[56]  L. Claes,et al.  Prediction of fracture load at different skeletal sites by geometric properties of the cortical shell , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.