Biological legacies buffer local species extinction after logging

Summary Clearcutting has been identified as a main threat to forest biodiversity. In the last few decades, alternatives to clearcutting have gained much interest. Living and dead trees are often retained after harvest to serve as structural legacies to mitigate negative effects of forestry. However, this practice is widely employed without information from systematic before–after control‐impact studies to assess the processes involved in species responses after clearcutting with retention. We performed a large‐scale survey of the occurrence of logging‐sensitive and red‐listed bryophytes and lichens before and after clearcutting with the retention approach. A methodology was adopted that, for the first time in studies on retention approaches, enabled monitoring of location‐specific substrates. We used uncut stands as controls to assess the variables affecting the survival of species after a major disturbance. In total, 12 bryophyte species and 27 lichen species were analysed. All were classified as sensitive to logging, and most species are also currently red‐listed. We found that living and dead trees retained after final harvest acted as refugia in which logging‐sensitive species were able to survive for 3 to 7 years after logging. Depending on type of retention and organism group, between 35% and 92% of the species occurrences persisted on retained structures. Most species observed outside retention trees or patches disappeared. Larger pre‐harvest population sizes of bryophytes on dead wood increased the survival probability of the species and hence buffered the negative effects of logging. Synthesis and applications. Careful spatial planning of retention structures is required to fully embrace the habitats of logging‐sensitive species. Bryophytes and lichens persisted to a higher degree in retention patches compared to solitary trees or in the clearcut area. Retaining groups of trees in logged areas will help to sustain populations of species over the clearcut phase. When possible, old logs should be moved into retention patches to provide a more beneficial environment for dead wood‐dependent species. Our study also highlights the need for more before–after control‐impact studies of retention forestry to explore factors influencing the survival of species after logging.

[1]  S. Scheu,et al.  Biodiversity and Litter Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems , 2005 .

[2]  T. Spies,et al.  Contrasting microclimates among clearcut, edge, and interior of old-growth Douglas-fir forest , 1993 .

[3]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  High occurrence of red-listed bryophytes and lichens in mature managed forests in boreal Sweden , 2004 .

[4]  C. Nilsson,et al.  High resilience of bryophyte assemblages in streamside compared to upland forests. , 2009, Ecology.

[5]  T. Kuuluvainen Forest Management and Biodiversity Conservation Based on Natural Ecosystem Dynamics in Northern Europe: The Complexity Challenge , 2009, Ambio.

[6]  Per Hedström,et al.  Conservation of epiphytic lichens : Significance of remnant aspen (Populus tremula) trees in clear-cuts , 2007 .

[7]  A. Nordin,et al.  Lichen-forming and lichenicolous fungi of Fennoscandia , 2004 .

[8]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Effects of forest-fuel harvesting on the amount of deadwood on clear-cuts , 2005 .

[9]  T. Snäll,et al.  Spatial occurrence and colonisations in patch‐tracking metapopulations: local conditions versus dispersal , 2003 .

[10]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[11]  W. Keeton,et al.  Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example , 2002 .

[12]  K. Abromeit Music Received , 2023, Notes.

[13]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  INTERPOLATING, EXTRAPOLATING, AND COMPARING INCIDENCE-BASED SPECIES ACCUMULATION CURVES , 2004 .

[14]  J. Magnuson,et al.  Threads of Continuity There are immense differences between even-aged silvicultural disturbances (especially clearcutting) and natural disturbances, such as windthrow, wildfire, and even volcanic eruptions. , 2000 .

[15]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Retention Forestry to Maintain Multifunctional Forests: A World Perspective , 2012 .

[16]  K. Hylander No increase in colonization rate of boreal bryophytes close to propagule sources. , 2009, Ecology.

[17]  I. Vanha-Majamaa,et al.  Impacts of retention felling on coarse woody debris (CWD) in mature boreal spruce forests in Finland , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[18]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  A major shift to the retention approach for forestry can help resolve some global forest sustainability issues , 2012 .

[19]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Biological legacies soften pine plantation effects for bryophytes , 2009, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[20]  C. Nilsson,et al.  SUBSTRATE FORM DETERMINES THE FATE OF BRYOPHYTES IN RIPARIAN BUFFER STRIPS , 2005 .

[21]  M. Proctor Physiological Ecology: Water Relations, Light and Temperature Responses, Carbon Balance , 1982 .

[22]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness , 2001 .

[23]  T. Ahti,et al.  Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe , 1968 .

[24]  A. Gelman Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[25]  H. Rydin,et al.  Positive Edge Effects on Forest-Interior Cryptogams in Clear-Cuts , 2011, PloS one.

[26]  Mollie E. Brooks,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  T. Green,et al.  Ecophysiology of Desiccation/Rehydration Cycles in Mosses and Lichens , 2011 .

[28]  Charles B. Halpern,et al.  Variation in microclimate associated with dispersed-retention harvests in coniferous forests of western Washington , 2006 .

[29]  I. Jamieson,et al.  Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutions , 2011, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[30]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  The forgotten stage of forest succession: early-successional ecosystems on forest sites , 2011 .

[31]  K. Hylander,et al.  Do time‐lagged extinctions and colonizations change the interpretation of buffer strip effectiveness? – a study of riparian bryophytes in the first decade after logging , 2012 .

[32]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Forests Regenerating after Clear-Cutting Function as Habitat for Bryophyte and Lichen Species of Conservation Concern , 2011, PloS one.

[33]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Retention patches as potential refugia for bryophytes and lichens in managed forest landscapes , 2009 .

[34]  Raul Rosenvald,et al.  For what, when, and where is green-tree retention better than clear-cutting? A review of the biodiversity aspects , 2008 .

[35]  G. Andrew,et al.  arm: Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2014 .