Demand for public education: Evidence from a rural school district

Abstract This study examines the question of how much households are willing to pay for improvements in the quality of local public education in two areas of a rural school district in Pennsylvania. The study uses the contingent valuation technique to obtain micro-data by personal interview on demand for improved public school quality. Estimates of willingness to pay are computed and probit/Tobit analyses are used to determine what household characteristics are associated with household willingness to pay. The results of this analysis indicate that the majority of respondents do value improved public school quality and that residents would pay up to approximately an additional 25% of current educational budgets for a 10% improvement in school quality as measured by achievement test performance. However, lower income households and those with fewer connections to the local public school are less likely to be supportive of increased expenditures.

[1]  D. Bromley Handbook of environmental economics , 1995 .

[2]  R. Lankford Preferences of citizens for public expenditures on elementary and secondary education , 1985 .

[3]  Cynthia Miller Demographics and spending for public education: a test of interest group influence , 1996 .

[4]  D. Rubinfeld,et al.  Micro-Based Estimates of Demand Functions for Local School Expenditures , 1982 .

[5]  M. Lea,et al.  Microdata estimation of school expenditure levels: An alternative to the median voter approach , 1982 .

[6]  N. Hanley,et al.  Cost–Benefit Analysis and the Environment , 1993 .

[7]  R. Lankford Efficiency and Equity in the Provision of Public Education , 1985 .

[8]  D. Rubinfeld Voting in a Local School Election: A Micro Analysis , 1977 .

[9]  David A. Belsley,et al.  Regression Analysis and its Application: A Data-Oriented Approach.@@@Applied Linear Regression.@@@Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity , 1981 .

[10]  R. Barlow Efficiency Aspects of Local School Finance , 1970, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  Catherine M. Chambers,et al.  Contingent Valuation of Quasi-Public Goods: Validity, Reliability, and Application To Valuing a Historic Site , 1998 .

[12]  R. Carson Contingent Valuation: A User's Guide† , 1999 .

[13]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[14]  Eric A. Hanushek,et al.  The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools , 1986 .

[15]  J. Heckman Policies to Foster Human Capital , 2000 .

[16]  D. Rubinfeld,et al.  A test for efficiency in the supply of public education , 1988 .

[17]  H. Thurston Non-market Valuation on the Internet , 2006 .

[18]  Charles M. Tiebout A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures , 1956, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  J. Akin,et al.  The Efficiency of Local School Finance , 1976 .

[20]  R. Turner The Place of Economic Values in Environmental Valuation , 2001 .

[21]  R. Cornes,et al.  The theory of externalities, public goods and club goods. 2nd. ed. , 1996 .