The effect of a pictorial illusion on closed-loop and open-loop prehension

Abstract. It has been proposed that movements to visible and remembered targets are sensitive to qualitatively different types of visual information. When the target is continuously visible, prehensile movements are thought to reflect veridical object size, whereas memory-dependent prehension is sensitive to the perceived size of the object. This hypothesis was explored by assessing the influence of illusory target width on prehension kinematics in three visual conditions: closed-loop (CL; full vision during the response), open-loop brief-delay (OL; visual occlusion coincident with the movement initiation cue) and open-loop 3-s delay (OL3; visual occlusion 3 s prior to movement initiation). To modulate illusory target width, objects were placed on backgrounds consisting of three forms of the Müller-Lyer (ML) figure. Peak grip aperture was sensitive to the ML figure in the OL and OL3, but not CL conditions, suggesting that perceptual information is used to modulate this grasping parameter when the movement is programmed and executed on the basis of visual memory. Peak-aperture velocity was affected by the ML illusion in all three visual conditions, suggesting that perceived object size might be important for modulating this aspect of prehension, independent of memory requirements. The different sensitivity of grip aperture and aperture velocity to illusory target width in the CL condition suggests that grasp preshaping might reflect multiple visuomotor processes. The results of this study are consistent with the tenets of the two-stream model of visual processing.

[1]  Romeo Chua,et al.  On-line control of rapid aiming movements: Unexpected target perturbations and movement kinematics. , 1998 .

[2]  M. Arbib,et al.  Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[3]  D. Elliott,et al.  The role of target information on manual-aiming bias , 1995, Psychological Research.

[4]  David L. Sparks,et al.  Saccades to remembered target locations: an analysis of systematic and variable errors , 1994, Vision Research.

[5]  Andrea H. Mason,et al.  Target viewing time and velocity effects on prehension , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  The Effect of Pictorial Illusion on Prehension and Perception , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  A. Mack,et al.  The dissociation of position and extent in Müller-Lyer figures , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Richard A. Andersen,et al.  Sensorimotor transformation during eye movements to remembered visual targets , 1991, Vision Research.

[9]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Further properties of the human saccadic system: eye movements and correction saccades with and without visual fixation points. , 1969, Vision research.

[11]  M. Goodale,et al.  Does a monocularly presented size-contrast illusion influence grip aperture? , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  S. Adamovich,et al.  Pointing in 3D space to remembered targets. I. Kinesthetic versus visual target presentation. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  D. Elliott,et al.  The Influence of Premovement Visual Information on Manual Aiming , 1987, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  Paul Milgram,et al.  A spectacle-mounted liquid-crystal tachistoscope , 1987 .

[15]  M. Goodale,et al.  The effects of delay on the kinematics of grasping , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  A Mack,et al.  Saccadic programming and perceived location. , 1981, Acta psychologica.

[17]  S. Chieffi,et al.  Visual illusion and action , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  M. Goodale,et al.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand , 1995, Current Biology.

[19]  L. Jakobson,et al.  Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  M. Jeannerod Mechanisms of visuomotor coordination: A study in normal and brain-damaged subjects , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Accepted April,et al.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension , 1991 .

[22]  P van Donkelaar Pointing movements are affected by size-contrast illusions , 1999, Experimental brain research.

[23]  A. Milner,et al.  A paradoxical improvement of misreaching in optic ataxia: new evidence for two separate neural systems for visual localization , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  D. Elliott,et al.  The Müller–Lyer illusion as a perturbation to the saccadic system , 1999 .

[25]  F. Pavani,et al.  Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion? , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.