Impact of an optical coherence tomography guided approach in acute coronary syndromes: A propensity matched analysis from the international FORMIDABLE‐CARDIOGROUP IV and USZ registry

Aim. To determine the potential clinical impact of OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with ACS (Acute Coronary Syndrome). Methods and Results. FORMIDABLE is a multicentre retrospective registry enrolling all patients presenting with ACS and treated with an OCT‐guided approach, while the USZ registry enrolled patients treated with a standard angiography guided approach. Multivariate adjustment was performed via a propensity score matching. The number stents useds was the primary outcome, while the incidence of MACE (a composite of death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis) was the secondary endpoint. A total of 285 patients OCT‐guided and 1,547 angiography guided patients were enrolled, resulting in 270 for each cohort after propensity score with matching. Two stents were used in 12% versus 34%; 3 stents in 8% versus 38% of the patients (P < 0.001). After a follow up of 700 days (450–890), there was no difference in myocardial infarction (6% vs. 6%, P = 0.86), while MACE (11% vs. 16%, P = 0.06), target vessel revascularization (2% vs. 4%, P = 0.15) and stent thrombosis rates (0% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.26) were numerically lower for the OCT‐guided cohort but none of these endpoints did reach statistical significance. Conclusions. An OCT‐guided approach reduced the number of stents used, number of patients treated with more than one stent, while there was no statistically significant difference in clinical endpoints while most of them were numerically lower, including stent thrombosis rates. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  P. Serruys,et al.  Optical coherence tomography evaluation of intermediate-term healing of different stent types: systemic review and meta-analysis , 2017, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[2]  G. Niccoli,et al.  Prevalence and predictors of culprit plaque rupture at OCT in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. , 2016, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[3]  G. Stone,et al.  Meta-Analysis of the Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Treated With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents. , 2016, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  Shao-Liang Chen,et al.  Provisional vs. two-stent technique for unprotected left main coronary artery disease after ten years follow up: A propensity matched analysis. , 2016, International journal of cardiology.

[5]  F. Burzotta,et al.  Impact of Culprit Plaque and Atherothrombotic Components on Incomplete Stent Apposition in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Everolimus-Eluting Stents - An OCTAVIA Substudy. , 2016, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[6]  M. Horie,et al.  Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance vs. Angiographic Guidance in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction - Long-Term Clinical Outcomes From the CREDO-Kyoto AMI Registry. , 2016, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[7]  Yangsoo Jang,et al.  Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided vs Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: The IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2015, JAMA.

[8]  F. Gaita,et al.  The butler did it! A very late stent thrombosis of TAXUS evaluated with Optical Coherence Tomography. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[9]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Accuracy of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in identifying functionally significant coronary stenosis according to vessel diameter: A meta-analysis of 2,581 patients and 2,807 lesions. , 2015, American heart journal.

[10]  F. Wolf,et al.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2016 Abridged for Primary Care Providers , 2016, Clinical Diabetes.

[11]  P. Serruys,et al.  Randomized study to assess the effect of thrombus aspiration on flow area in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an optical frequency domain imaging study--TROFI trial. , 2013, European heart journal.

[12]  Yusuke Fujino,et al.  Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[13]  F. Gaita,et al.  Use and misuse of multivariable approaches in interventional cardiology studies on drug-eluting stents: a systematic review. , 2012, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[14]  M. Budoff,et al.  Prevalence and non-invasive predictors of left main or three-vessel coronary disease: evidence from a collaborative international meta-analysis including 22 740 patients , 2012, Heart.

[15]  M. Kimura,et al.  Association of coronary plaque composition and arterial remodelling: a optical coherence tomography study. , 2012, Atherosclerosis.

[16]  Akiko Maehara,et al.  Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation , 2012 .

[18]  T. Lauer,et al.  Kardiologische Aspekte der präoperativen Risikostratifizierung , 2011 .

[19]  L. Hongbin,et al.  Assessment of coronary plaque characteristics by optical coherence tomography in patients with diabetes mellitus complicated with unstable angina pectoris. , 2010, Atherosclerosis.

[20]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Baseline Risk of Major Bleeding in Non–ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines) Bleeding Score , 2009, Circulation.

[21]  N. Weissman,et al.  The potential clinical utility of intravascular ultrasound guidance in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. , 2008, European heart journal.

[22]  Raimund Erbel,et al.  Effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis: the ASTEROID trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[23]  Brett E. Bouma,et al.  In Vivo Characterization of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque by Use of Optical Coherence Tomography , 2005, Circulation.

[24]  Y. Jang,et al.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2010 by the American Diabetes Association: Prevention and Management of Cardiovascular Disease , 2010 .

[25]  Paul Schoenhagen,et al.  Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[26]  Akiko Maehara,et al.  Morphologic and angiographic features of coronary plaque rupture detected by intravascular ultrasound. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  M. Leon,et al.  Impact of preintervention intravascular ultrasound imaging on transcatheter treatment strategies in coronary artery disease. , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.

[28]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Contribution of Localized Calcium Deposits to Dissection After Angioplasty: An Observational Study Using Intravascular Ultrasound , 1992, Circulation.