Functional brain segmentation using inter-subject correlation in fMRI

The human brain continuously processes massive amounts of rich sensory information. To better understand such highly complex brain processes, modern neuroimaging studies are increasingly utilizing experimental setups that better mimic daily-life situations. We propose a new exploratory data-analysis approach, functional segmentation intersubject correlation analysis (FuSeISC), to facilitate the analysis of functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) data sets collected in these experiments. The method provides a new type of functional segmentation of brain areas, not only characterizing areas that display similar processing across subjects but also areas in which processing across subjects is highly variable. We tested FuSeISC using fMRI data sets collected during traditional block-design stimuli (37 subjects) as well as naturalistic auditory narratives (19 subjects). The method identified spatially local and/or bilaterally symmetric clusters in several cortical areas, many of which are known to be processing the types of stimuli used in the experiments. The method is not only prominent for spatial exploration of large fMRI data sets obtained using naturalistic stimuli, but has other potential applications such as generation of a functional brain atlases including both lower-and higher-order processing areas. Finally, as a part of FuSeISC, we propose a criterion-based sparsification of the shared nearest-neighbor graph for detecting clusters in noisy data. In our tests with synthetic data, this technique was superior to well-known clustering methods, such as Ward's method, affinity propagation and K-means++.

[1]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Clustering inter-subject correlation matrices in functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2010, Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine.

[2]  Linda Geerligs,et al.  State and Trait Components of Functional Connectivity: Individual Differences Vary with Mental State , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Hesheng Liu,et al.  Functional Connectivity Architecture of the Human Brain , 2014, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[4]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  M. Fox,et al.  Individual Variability in Functional Connectivity Architecture of the Human Brain , 2013, Neuron.

[6]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[7]  Xiangyu Long,et al.  Functional segmentation of the brain cortex using high model order group PICA , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[8]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  Characterizing individual differences in functional connectivity using dual-regression and seed-based approaches , 2014, NeuroImage.

[9]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Extrinsic and intrinsic systems in the posterior cortex of the human brain revealed during natural sensory stimulation. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  J. H. Ward Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .

[11]  Johannes Blömer,et al.  Simple Methods for Initializing the EM Algorithm for Gaussian Mixture Models , 2013, ArXiv.

[12]  L. Nummenmaa,et al.  The brains of high functioning autistic individuals do not synchronize with those of others☆ , 2013, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[13]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Towards natural stimulation in fMRI—Issues of data analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[14]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Inter-Subject Correlation of Brain Hemodynamic Responses During Watching a Movie: Localization in Space and Frequency , 2009, Front. Neuroinform..

[15]  Polina Golland,et al.  Search for patterns of functional specificity in the brain: A nonparametric hierarchical Bayesian model for group fMRI data , 2011, NeuroImage.

[16]  Teofilo F. GONZALEZ,et al.  Clustering to Minimize the Maximum Intercluster Distance , 1985, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[17]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[18]  Bryan R. Conroy,et al.  Function-based Intersubject Alignment of Human Cortical Anatomy , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  Sergei Vassilvitskii,et al.  k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding , 2007, SODA '07.

[20]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Multi-level bootstrap analysis of stable clusters in resting-state fMRI , 2009, NeuroImage.

[21]  Ray A. Jarvis,et al.  Clustering Using a Similarity Measure Based on Shared Near Neighbors , 1973, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[22]  Jukka-Pekka Kauppi,et al.  Inter-Subject Correlation in fMRI: Method Validation against Stimulus-Model Based Analysis , 2012, PloS one.

[23]  Delbert Dueck,et al.  Clustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points , 2007, Science.

[24]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  Can Shared-Neighbor Distances Defeat the Curse of Dimensionality? , 2010, SSDBM.

[25]  Bryan R. Conroy,et al.  A Common, High-Dimensional Model of the Representational Space in Human Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2011, Neuron.

[26]  K. Amunts,et al.  Individual variability is not noise , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Temporal dynamics of musical emotions examined through intersubject synchrony of brain activity. , 2015, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[28]  A. L. Bowley The Standard Deviation of the Correlation Coefficient , 1928 .

[29]  Eleonora Maggioni,et al.  Constructing fMRI connectivity networks: A whole brain functional parcellation method for node definition , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[30]  G. Varoquaux,et al.  Connectivity‐based parcellation: Critique and implications , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[31]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  Spectators’ Aesthetic Experience of Sound and Movement in Dance Performance: A Transdisciplinary Investigation , 2016 .

[32]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Which fMRI clustering gives good brain parcellations? , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[33]  Topi Tanskanen,et al.  Face recognition and cortical responses: Effect of stimulus duration , 2007, NeuroImage.

[34]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[35]  J Mazziotta,et al.  A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[36]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Model-Based Clustering, Discriminant Analysis, and Density Estimation , 2002 .

[37]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Building a Science of Individual Differences from fMRI , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[39]  Daniel T. Larose,et al.  Discovering Knowledge in Data: An Introduction to Data Mining , 2005 .

[40]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Spatially constrained hierarchical parcellation of the brain with resting-state fMRI , 2013, NeuroImage.

[41]  R. Malach,et al.  Intersubject Synchronization of Cortical Activity During Natural Vision , 2004, Science.

[42]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Approaches to Capture Variance Differences in Rest fMRI Networks in the Spatial Geometric Features: Application to Schizophrenia , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[43]  Istvan Molnar-Szakacs,et al.  Beyond superior temporal cortex: intersubject correlations in narrative speech comprehension. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  Vipin Kumar,et al.  Finding Clusters of Different Sizes, Shapes, and Densities in Noisy, High Dimensional Data , 2003, SDM.

[45]  J. A. Movshon,et al.  The dependence of response amplitude and variance of cat visual cortical neurones on stimulus contrast , 1981, Experimental Brain Research.

[46]  Parag Chordia,et al.  Inter‐subject synchronization of brain responses during natural music listening , 2013, The European journal of neuroscience.

[47]  R Cameron Craddock,et al.  A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[48]  R. Hari,et al.  Emotions promote social interaction by synchronizing brain activity across individuals , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  R. Buckner,et al.  Parcellating Cortical Functional Networks in Individuals , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[51]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Informatics and Data Mining Tools and Strategies for the Human Connectome Project , 2011, Front. Neuroinform..

[52]  Jussi Tohka,et al.  Post-print: Effects of spatial smoothing on inter-subject correlation based analysis of FMRI , 2014 .

[53]  M. P. van den Heuvel,et al.  Normalized Cut Group Clustering of Resting-State fMRI Data , 2008, PloS one.

[54]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  On Convergence Properties of the EM Algorithm for Gaussian Mixtures , 1996, Neural Computation.

[55]  P. Deb Finite Mixture Models , 2008 .

[56]  Steen Moeller,et al.  The Human Connectome Project: A data acquisition perspective , 2012, NeuroImage.

[57]  J. S. Guntupalli,et al.  A Model of Representational Spaces in Human Cortex , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[58]  David B. Shmoys,et al.  A Best Possible Heuristic for the k-Center Problem , 1985, Math. Oper. Res..

[59]  Oliver Speck,et al.  A high-resolution 7-Tesla fMRI dataset from complex natural stimulation with an audio movie , 2014, Scientific Data.

[60]  D. Heeger,et al.  Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[61]  M. Cugmas,et al.  On comparing partitions , 2015 .

[62]  Pia Tikka,et al.  Spatial variability of functional brain networks in early-blind and sighted subjects , 2014, NeuroImage.

[63]  J. Munkres ALGORITHMS FOR THE ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSIORTATION tROBLEMS* , 1957 .

[64]  Iiro P. Jääskeläinen,et al.  Brain hemodynamic activity during viewing and re-viewing of comedy movies explained by experienced humor , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[65]  Jussi Tohka,et al.  A versatile software package for inter-subject correlation based analyses of fMRI , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[66]  Sanjoy Dasgupta,et al.  A Two-Round Variant of EM for Gaussian Mixtures , 2000, UAI.

[67]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Unsupervised Learning of Finite Mixture Models , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[68]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  NeuroVault.org: A repository for sharing unthresholded statistical maps, parcellations, and atlases of the human brain , 2016, NeuroImage.

[69]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[70]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  What Is the Human Connectome , 2009 .

[71]  Delbert Dueck,et al.  Affinity Propagation: Clustering Data by Passing Messages , 2009 .

[72]  Pia Tikka,et al.  Functional Subdivision of Group-ICA Results of fMRI Data Collected during Cinema Viewing , 2012, PloS one.

[73]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  On Clustering fMRI Time Series , 1999, NeuroImage.