Clinical decision-making by midwives: managing case complexity.

In making clinical judgements, it is argued that midwives use 'shortcuts' or heuristics based on estimated probabilities to simplify the decision-making task. Midwives (n = 30) were given simulated patient assessment situations of high and low complexity and were required to think aloud. Analysis of verbal protocols showed that subjective probability judgements (heuristics) were used more frequently in the high than low complexity case and predominated in the last quarter of the assessment period for the high complexity case. 'Representativeness' was identified more frequently in the high than in the low case, but was the dominant heuristic in both. Reports completed after each simulation suggest that heuristics based on memory for particular conditions affect decisions. It is concluded that midwives use heuristics, derived mainly from their clinical experiences, in an attempt to save cognitive effort and to facilitate reasonably accurate decisions in the decision-making process.

[1]  B. Kuipers,et al.  Critical Decisions under Uncertainty: Representation and Structure , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  S Corcoran Decision analysis: a step-by-step guide for making clinical decisions. , 1986, Nursing & health care : official publication of the National League for Nursing.

[3]  P N Stern,et al.  Discovery of Nursing Gestalt in critical care nursing: the importance of the Gray Gorilla syndrome. , 1983, Image--the journal of nursing scholarship.

[4]  D. Krantz,et al.  The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning , 1983 .

[5]  J. A. Jones,et al.  Clinical reasoning in nursing. , 1988, Journal of advanced nursing.

[6]  D. Carnevali Diagnostic reasoning in nursing , 1985 .

[7]  Arthur S. Elstein,et al.  Medical Problem Solving , 1990 .

[8]  M. Gordon Predictive Strategies in Diagnostic Tasks , 1980, Nursing research.

[9]  P. Benner,et al.  Clinical judgment: how expert nurses use intuition. , 1987, The American journal of nursing.

[10]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Bias and error in human judgment , 1983 .

[11]  C. Tanner,et al.  Diagnostic Reasoning Strategies Of Nurses and Nursing Students , 1987, Nursing research.

[12]  K. R. Hammond CLINICAL INFERENCE IN NURSING: II. A Psychologist's Viewpoint , 1966, Nursing research.

[13]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[14]  M. Bar-Hillel The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. , 1980 .

[15]  Arthur S. Elstein,et al.  Psychological Approaches to Medical Decision Making , 1982 .

[16]  Alan J. Mayne,et al.  Decision Research: A Field Guide , 1990 .

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  Variants of uncertainty , 1982, Cognition.

[18]  I. Ajzen Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base-rate information on prediction. , 1977 .

[19]  M. Grier Decision Making about Patient Care , 1976, Nursing research.

[20]  R. A. Cosier,et al.  Presenting information under conditions of uncertainty and availability: some recommendations , 1989 .

[21]  K. Hughes,et al.  The relationship between task complexity and decision-making consistency. , 1990, Research in nursing & health.

[22]  W. C. Howell,et al.  Uncertainty measurement: A cognitive taxonomy , 1978 .

[23]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Variants of uncertainty , 1982 .

[24]  L Rew,et al.  Intuition in decision-making. , 1988, Image--the journal of nursing scholarship.

[25]  P. Benner,et al.  Skilled Clinical Knowledge: The Value of Perceptual Awareness , 1982, Nurse educator.

[26]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[27]  D. Bernoulli Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk , 1954 .

[28]  W. Ammentorp,et al.  Information Structures: An Analysis of Nursing Performance , 1979, Nursing research.

[29]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .