Computational mechanics modelling of cell–substrate contact during cyclic substrate deformation

Abstract Experimental testing carried out on various adherent cell types cultured on deformable substrates reveals specific patterns of cell reorientation in response to cyclic stretching of the substrate. In Wang et al. (2001. Specificity of endothelial cell reorientation in response to cyclic mechanical stretching. J. Biomech. 34, 1563), a number of substrate deformation modes were considered: in cases where lateral deformation of the substrate was prohibited (uniaxial case) cells were found to elongate perpendicular to the stretch direction, whereas in cases where the substrate was laterally unrestrained (biaxial case) cells were found to elongate at an angle to the stretch direction. The alignment directions in both cases corresponded to directions of minimum substrate strain. However, the mechanisms underlying such behaviour are not apparent from such in-vitro testing and consequently are not well understood. In this study finite element models are developed in order to investigate the role of cell viscoelasticity in cell debonding and cell realignment under conditions of cyclic substrate stretching using cohesive zone formulations to simulate cell–substrate interfacial behaviour. The characteristic length scale used in such models is based on the length of the receptor–ligand bonds at the cell–substrate interface. Two-dimensional simulations reveal that permanent debonding at the cell–substrate interface occurs due to the accumulation of strain concentrations in the cell. Inclusion of a nucleus in two-dimensional models is shown to have little effect on debonding while discrete cell–substrate contact at focal adhesion sites results in a completion of debonding in fewer cycles. Three-dimensional cohesive zone models are developed in order to compute changes in cell–substrate contact under the aforementioned uniaxial and biaxial modes of substrate deformation. Results reveal that, due to the accumulation of tensile and compressive strains in the cell under cyclic deformation, definite patterns of cell–substrate contact area evolution are computed. With continued cycling, equilibrium contact area profiles with definite orientations are established. These orientations are found to be coincidental with the preferential cell orientation directions seen in the experiments. As no changes in cell morphology are predicted by the models it is concluded that permanent breaking of cell–substrate bonds constitutes the first stage in the process of cell alignment under such mechanical loading.

[1]  R M Nerem,et al.  The application of a homogeneous half-space model in the analysis of endothelial cell micropipette measurements. , 1988, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  Wei Huang,et al.  Quantification of Varying Adhesion Levels in Chondrocytes Using the Cytodetacher , 2002, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Joshua R. Smith,et al.  Universal binding energy curves for metals and bimetallic interfaces , 1981 .

[4]  Bahman Anvari,et al.  Temporal effects of cell adhesion on mechanical characteristics of the single chondrocyte , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  James R. Rice,et al.  Embrittlement of interfaces by solute segregation , 1989 .

[6]  Smith,et al.  Theory of the bimetallic interface. , 1985, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[7]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  A. Needleman An analysis of tensile decohesion along an interface , 1990 .

[9]  V. Moy,et al.  Cooperative adhesion of ligand-receptor bonds. , 2003, Biophysical chemistry.

[10]  H. P. Ting-Beall,et al.  The effects of osmotic stress on the viscoelastic and physical properties of articular chondrocytes. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[11]  Sunil Saigal,et al.  COHESIVE ELEMENT MODELING OF VISCOELASTIC FRACTURE: APPLICATION TO PEEL TESTING OF POLYMERS , 2000 .

[12]  E. Grood,et al.  Cell orientation response to cyclically deformed substrates: experimental validation of a cell model. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  J. H. Wang,et al.  Substrate deformation determines actin cytoskeleton reorganization: A mathematical modeling and experimental study. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  T. Takemasa,et al.  Amplitude-dependent stress fiber reorientation in early response to cyclic strain. , 1997, Experimental cell research.

[15]  A. Yamamoto,et al.  A new technique for direct measurement of the shear force necessary to detach a cell from a material. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[16]  T. Ohashi,et al.  Experimental and numerical analyses of local mechanical properties measured by atomic force microscopy for sheared endothelial cells. , 2002, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[17]  T. Springer,et al.  Leukocytes roll on a selectin at physiologic flow rates: Distinction from and prerequisite for adhesion through integrins , 1991, Cell.

[18]  T. Takemasa,et al.  Oblique alignment of stress fibers in cells reduces the mechanical stress in cyclically deforming fields. , 1998, European journal of cell biology.

[19]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  An axisymmetric boundary integral model for assessing elastic cell properties in the micropipette aspiration contact problem. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[20]  K. Fujiwara,et al.  Morphological responses of single endothelial cells exposed to physiological levels of fluid shear stress. , 1993, Frontiers of medical and biological engineering : the international journal of the Japan Society of Medical Electronics and Biological Engineering.

[21]  R. Brand,et al.  Cell alignment is induced by cyclic changes in cell length: studies of cells grown in cyclically stretched substrates , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[22]  K. Sung,et al.  Adhesion strength of human ligament fibroblasts. , 1994, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[23]  John R. Smith,et al.  Universal features of bonding in metals , 1983 .

[24]  R. Buck,et al.  Reorientation response of cells to repeated stretch and recoil of the substratum. , 1980, Experimental cell research.

[25]  K Athanasiou,et al.  Cytoindentation for obtaining cell biomechanical properties , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[26]  G. Truskey,et al.  Effect of receptor-ligand affinity on the strength of endothelial cell adhesion. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[27]  Xiaopeng Xu,et al.  Void nucleation by inclusion debonding in a crystal matrix , 1993 .

[28]  D E Ingber,et al.  Cellular control lies in the balance of forces. , 1998, Current opinion in cell biology.

[29]  A. Needleman A Continuum Model for Void Nucleation by Inclusion Debonding , 1987 .

[30]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[31]  Atsushi Ikai,et al.  Quantification of fibronectin and cell surface interactions by AFM , 2002 .

[32]  Jean-Jacques Meister,et al.  Changes in the mechanical properties of fibroblasts during spreading: a micromanipulation study , 1999, European Biophysics Journal.

[33]  R M Nerem,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of cultured porcine aortic endothelial cells exposed to shear stress. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  O. Thoumine,et al.  Time scale dependent viscoelastic and contractile regimes in fibroblasts probed by microplate manipulation. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[35]  W. Kraus,et al.  Endothelial, cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle exhibit different viscous and elastic properties as determined by atomic force microscopy. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  S. Suresh,et al.  Cell and molecular mechanics of biological materials , 2003, Nature materials.

[37]  D. Leckband,et al.  Intermolecular forces in biology , 2001, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[38]  Richard T. Lee,et al.  A three-dimensional viscoelastic model for cell deformation with experimental verification. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[39]  K. Athanasiou,et al.  Biomechanics of single chondrocytes and osteoarthritis. , 2002, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[40]  V. Mow,et al.  The mechanical environment of the chondrocyte: a biphasic finite element model of cell-matrix interactions in articular cartilage. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[41]  F Guilak,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of chondrocytes from normal and osteoarthritic human cartilage , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[42]  T. Andriacchi,et al.  Chondrocyte cells respond mechanically to compressive loads , 1994, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[43]  D. S. Dugdale Yielding of steel sheets containing slits , 1960 .

[44]  C. Zhu,et al.  Kinetics and mechanics of cell adhesion. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[45]  M A Horton,et al.  Single integrin molecule adhesion forces in intact cells measured by atomic force microscopy. , 1999, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[46]  J. Hutchinson,et al.  The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic-plastic solids , 1992 .

[47]  J. Kysar,et al.  Continuum simulations of directional dependence of crack growth along a copper/sapphire bicrystal interface. Part II: crack tip stress/deformation analysis , 2001 .

[48]  G. Truskey,et al.  An equilibrium model of endothelial cell adhesion via integrin-dependent and integrin-independent ligands. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[49]  D E Ingber,et al.  Control of cytoskeletal mechanics by extracellular matrix, cell shape, and mechanical tension. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[50]  N. Chandra,et al.  Some issues in the application of cohesive zone models for metal–ceramic interfaces , 2002 .

[51]  E. Evans Detailed mechanics of membrane-membrane adhesion and separation. I. Continuum of molecular cross-bridges. , 1985, Biophysical journal.

[52]  C Zhu,et al.  Cell mechanics: mechanical response, cell adhesion, and molecular deformation. , 2000, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[53]  K. Beningo,et al.  Flexible substrata for the detection of cellular traction forces. , 2002, Trends in cell biology.

[54]  H Weinans,et al.  Cell and nucleus deformation in compressed chondrocyte-alginate constructs: temporal changes and calculation of cell modulus. , 2002, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[55]  P. Davies,et al.  Endothelial cell adhesion in real time. Measurements in vitro by tandem scanning confocal image analysis. , 1993, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[56]  P. Geubelle,et al.  Impact-induced delamination of composites: A 2D simulation , 1998 .

[57]  A M Malek,et al.  Mechanism of endothelial cell shape change and cytoskeletal remodeling in response to fluid shear stress. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[58]  Kyriacos A. Athanasiou,et al.  Principles of Cell Mechanics for Cartilage Tissue Engineering , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[59]  K. Beningo,et al.  Nascent Focal Adhesions Are Responsible for the Generation of Strong Propulsive Forces in Migrating Fibroblasts , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[60]  D. Torney,et al.  The reaction-limited kinetics of membrane-to-surface adhesion and detachment , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[61]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  N. Caille,et al.  Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[63]  Kyriacos A Athanasiou,et al.  Creep indentation of single cells. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[64]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[65]  Micah Dembo,et al.  Regulation of mechanical interactions between fibroblasts and the substratum by stretch-activated Ca2+ entry , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[66]  F. Yin,et al.  Contractility Affects Stress Fiber Remodeling and Reorientation of Endothelial Cells Subjected to Cyclic Mechanical Stretching , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[67]  P. Dartsch,et al.  Response of cultured endothelial cells to mechanical stimulation , 1989, Basic Research in Cardiology.

[68]  J. Kysar,et al.  Continuum simulations of directional dependence of crack growth along a copper/sapphire bicrystal interface. Part I: experiments and crystal plasticity background , 2001 .

[69]  D. Ingber,et al.  A Computational Tensegrity Model Predicts Dynamic Rheological Behaviors in Living Cells , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[70]  G. I. Barenblatt THE MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF EQUILIBRIUM CRACKS IN BRITTLE FRACTURE , 1962 .

[71]  V. Mow,et al.  Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression? Theory and experiments. , 1980, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[72]  W. R. Jones,et al.  The deformation behavior and mechanical properties of chondrocytes in articular cartilage. , 1999, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[73]  R M Nerem,et al.  Application of the micropipette technique to the measurement of cultured porcine aortic endothelial cell viscoelastic properties. , 1990, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[74]  Nic D. Leipzig,et al.  Unconfined creep compression of chondrocytes. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[75]  G. I. Bell Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.

[76]  Miroslav Zivkovic,et al.  A finite element model of cell deformation during magnetic bead twisting. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.

[77]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[78]  P Bongrand,et al.  Cell adhesion. Competition between nonspecific repulsion and specific bonding. , 1984, Biophysical journal.

[79]  D L Bader,et al.  Deformation properties of articular chondrocytes: a critique of three separate techniques. , 2002, Biorheology.

[80]  R. Hochmuth,et al.  Micropipette aspiration of living cells. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[81]  C. M. Agrawal,et al.  Development of the cytodetachment technique to quantify mechanical adhesiveness of the single cell. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[82]  P. Davies,et al.  Quantitative studies of endothelial cell adhesion. Directional remodeling of focal adhesion sites in response to flow forces. , 1994, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[83]  K. Nagayama,et al.  Local mechanical properties measured by atomic force microscopy for cultured bovine endothelial cells exposed to shear stress. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[84]  V. Tvergaard Effect of fibre debonding in a whisker-reinforced metal , 1990 .

[85]  H. Hämmerle,et al.  Orientation of cultured arterial smooth muscle cells growing on cyclically stretched substrates. , 1986, Acta anatomica.

[86]  L. B. Freund,et al.  The role of binder mobility in spontaneous adhesive contact and implications for cell adhesion , 2004 .

[87]  J. McGarry,et al.  A three-dimensional finite element model of an adherent eukaryotic cell. , 2004, European cells & materials.

[88]  F. Yin,et al.  Specificity of endothelial cell reorientation in response to cyclic mechanical stretching. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[89]  C. Dong,et al.  Biomechanics of cell rolling: shear flow, cell-surface adhesion, and cell deformability. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.