Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2

Study Design. A prospective, nonblinded, multicenter study of outcomes in patients undergoing single-level anterior lumbar discectomy and interbody fusion with InFUSE™ Bone Graft. Objective. To determine the safety and effectiveness of InFUSE™ Bone Graft applied to an absorbable collagen sponge in anterior lumbar interbody fusion with threaded cortical allografts. Summary of Background Data. In primates, InFUSE™ Bone Graft used with allograft dowels was shown to increase rates of interbody fusion by promoting osteoinduction and enhancing incorporation of the allograft. Recently, in a small series of human patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion with a tapered cylindrical metal fusion cage, InFUSE™ Bone Graft has been shown to promote osteoinduction and fusion. Methods. Forty-six patients underwent a single-level anterior lumbar discectomy and interbody fusion at five investigational sites. They were randomly assigned to one of two groups, and the results in the investigational patients who received threaded cortical allograft dowels with InFUSE™ Bone Graft were compared with those in the control patients who received threaded allograft dowels with autogenous iliac crest bone graft. Patients’ clinical outcomes were assessed using neurologic status, work status, and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability, Short Form-36, and back and leg pain questionnaires. Anteroposterior, lateral, flexion-extension radiographs, and computed tomography scans were used to evaluate the progression of fusion at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Results. All patients who received InFUSE™ Bone Graft showed radiographic evidence of bony induction and early incorporation of the cortical allografts. All patients in this group had fusions at 12 months that remained fused at 24 months. At 12 and 24 months, the investigational group showed higher rates of fusion and improved neurologic status and back and leg pain when compared with the control group. There were no unanticipated adverse events related to the use of InFUSE™ Bone Graft. Conclusion. The use of InFUSE™ Bone Graft is a promising method of facilitating anterior intervertebral spinal fusion, decreasing pain, and improving clinical outcomes in patients who have undergone anterior lumbar fusion surgery with structural threaded cortical allograft bone dowels.

[1]  K. Foley,et al.  Surgical Interbody Research Group--radiographic assessment of interbody fusion devices: fusion criteria for anterior lumbar interbody surgery. , 2001, Neurosurgical focus.

[2]  S. Boden,et al.  The Use of rhBMP-2 in Interbody Fusion Cages: Definitive Evidence of Osteoinduction in Humans: A Preliminary Report , 2000, Spine.

[3]  J. Fischgrund,et al.  The Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (rhBMP‐2) to Promote Spinal Fusion in a Nonhuman Primate Anterior Interbody Fusion Model , 1999, Spine.

[4]  J M Toth,et al.  Experimental Spinal Fusion With Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Without Decortication of Osseous Elements , 1997, Spine.

[5]  W C Hutton,et al.  The Use of an Osteoinductive Growth Factor for Lumbar Spinal Fusion: Part II Study of Dose, Carrier, and Species , 1995, Spine.

[6]  W. Hutton,et al.  Experimental Spinal Fusion With Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein‐2 , 1995, Spine.

[7]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. , 1994 .

[8]  B. J. Doherty,et al.  Interspace distraction and graft subsidence after anterior lumbar fusion with femoral strut allograft. , 1993, Spine.

[9]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[10]  S. Blumenthal,et al.  The Role of Anterior Lumbar Fusion for Internal Disc Disruption , 1988, Spine.

[11]  D. Ohnmeiss,et al.  Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 1988, Spine.

[12]  J. Leong,et al.  Long‐Term Results of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Prolapse , 1983, Spine.

[13]  Crock Hv.  Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: indications for its use and notes on surgical technique. , 1982 .

[14]  J. C. Flynn.  Sexual complications following anterior fusion of the lumbar spine , 1981 .

[15]  J C Fairbank,et al.  The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. , 1980, Physiotherapy.

[16]  J. C. Flynn,et al.  Anterior fusion of the lumbar spine. End-result study with long-term follow-up. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  R. N. Stauffer,et al.  Anterior interbody lumbar spine fusion. Analysis of Mayo Clinic series. , 1972, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  M. Urist,et al.  Bone: Formation by Autoinduction , 1965, Science.

[19]  S SACKS,et al.  ANTERIOR INTERBODY FUSION OF THE LUMBAR SPINE. , 1965, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[20]  J. Lane,et al.  TRANSPERITONEAL APPROACH TO THE INTERVERTEBRAL DISC IN THE.LUMBAR AREA , 1948, Annals of surgery.

[21]  H. V. Crock.  Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: indications for its use and notes on surgical technique. , 1982, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  P. Harmon.  Anterior excision and vertebral body fusion operation for intervertebral disk syndromes of the lower lumbar spine: three-to five-year results in 244 cases. , 1963, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.