Novel approach for the analysis of bench-scale, low pressure membrane fouling in water treatment

The concept of the unified membrane fouling index (UMFI) was introduced recently for assessing the fouling of low pressure membranes (LPM) used in water treatment. The major advantages of the UMFI over most other fouling indices are the universality (independent of filtration scale or mode) and specificity (based on the actual membrane of interest for full-scale application). This study applied the concept of the UMFI to the assessment of fouling results obtained in a bench-scale fouling study. This study was conducted with combinations of four commercially available LPMs and four natural waters (including secondary wastewater effluent) under systematically varied hydrodynamic conditions. It was found that, with the adoption of the UMFI, the fouling potential of different membrane and water combinations can be presented in a unified, concise, and quantitative way, enabling quantitative and integrated assessment of the fouling data and their relationships with different potential fouling factors. Expansion of the UMFI concept to other studies is anticipated to assist in the integration of the vast amount of bench-scale fouling results obtained with different LPMs; this integration is crucial to the mechanistic understanding of LPM fouling.

[1]  M. Jekel,et al.  Organic colloids and their influence on low-pressure membrane filtration. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[2]  P. Toledo,et al.  Pore blocking and permeability reduction in cross-flow microfiltration , 2002 .

[3]  L. Ricq,et al.  Effects of proteins on electrokinetic properties of inorganic membranes during ultra- and micro-filtration , 1996 .

[4]  Kerry J. Howe,et al.  Effect of membrane configuration on bench-scale MF and UF fouling experiments. , 2007, Water research.

[5]  G. Amy,et al.  Low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) fouling associated with allochthonous versus autochthonous natural organic matter. , 2006, Water research.

[6]  Brian Bolto,et al.  The fouling of microfiltration membranes by NOM after coagulation treatment , 2000 .

[7]  Anne M. Mayes,et al.  Design and performance of foul-resistant poly(vinylidene fluoride) membranes prepared in a single-step by surface segregation , 2002 .

[8]  Linfield Brown,et al.  Statistics for Environmental Engineers , 2002 .

[9]  Shankararaman Chellam,et al.  Existence of Critical Recovery and Impacts of Operational Mode on Potable Water Microfiltration , 1998 .

[10]  T Carroll,et al.  Polyelectrolyte-grafted microfiltration membranes to control fouling by natural organic matter in drinking water , 2002 .

[11]  Kerry J. Howe,et al.  Fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes by natural waters. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  C. Causserand,et al.  Study of streaming potentials of clean and fouled ultrafiltration membranes , 1994 .

[13]  Haiou Huang,et al.  Unified membrane fouling index for low pressure membrane filtration of natural waters: principles and methodology. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Haiou Huang,et al.  Direct-flow microfiltration of aquasols: I. Impacts of particle stabilities and size , 2008 .

[15]  Kerry J. Howe,et al.  Filtration of lake natural organic matter: Adsorption capacity of a polypropylene microfilter , 2005 .

[16]  R. Field,et al.  Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling , 1995 .

[17]  S. Bhattacharjee,et al.  Effect of Membrane Surface Roughness on Colloid−Membrane DLVO Interactions , 2003 .

[18]  A. Fane,et al.  Fouling effects on rejection in the membrane filtration of natural waters , 2000 .

[19]  Andrea I. Schäfer,et al.  Natural Organics Removal Using Membranes: Principles, Performance, and Cost , 2001 .

[20]  J. Laîné,et al.  Impact of ultrafiltration operating conditions on membrane irreversible fouling , 1997 .

[21]  Zhi-Kang Xu,et al.  Surface modification of polypropylene microporous membrane to improve its antifouling property in MBR: CO2 plasma treatment , 2005 .

[22]  L. Fan,et al.  Influence of the characteristics of natural organic matter on the fouling of microfiltration membranes. , 2001, Water research.

[23]  S. Chellam,et al.  Modeling and Experimental Verification of Pilot-Scale Hollow Fiber, Direct Flow Microfiltration with Periodic Backwashing , 1998 .

[24]  M. Clark,et al.  Adsorption of aquatic humic substances on hydrophobic ultrafiltration membranes , 1994 .

[25]  A. Zydney,et al.  Effect of membrane morphology on the initial rate of protein fouling during microfiltration , 1999 .

[26]  Haiou Huang,et al.  Natural organic matter fouling of low-pressure, hollow-fiber membranes: Effects of NOM source and hydrodynamic conditions. , 2007, Water research.

[27]  G. Belfort,et al.  Kinetics of Membrane Flux Decline: The Role of Natural Colloids and Mitigation via Membrane Surface Modification , 2005 .

[28]  G. Amy,et al.  Morphological analyses of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of low-pressure membranes (MF/UF) , 2005 .