Type, tweet, tap, and pass: How smart city technology is creating a transactional citizen

Abstract In the current push for smart city programs around the world, there is a significant focus on enabling transactions between citizen and government. Though traditionally there have always been transactional elements between government and citizen, for example payment of taxes in exchange for services, or voting in exchange for representation, the rise of modern smartphone and smart city technologies have further enabled micro-transactions between citizen, government, and information broker. We conceptualize how the modern smart city, as both envisaged and enacted, incorporates the citizen not necessarily as a whole actor, but as a series of micro-transactions encoded on the real-time landscape of the city. This transactional citizen becomes counted by smart city sensors and integrated into smart city decision-making through the use of certain preferred platforms. To approach this shift from traditional forms of citizen/city interaction towards micro-transactions, we conceptualize four broad modes of transaction; type (intentional contribution), tweet (intermediated by third party), tap (convened or requested transaction), and pass (ambient transaction based on movement). These four modes are used to frame critical questions of how citizens interact with government in the emerging age of the smart city, and how these interactions impact the relationship between citizen and government, introducing new avenues for private sector influence.

[1]  Matthew Zook Crowd-sourcing the smart city: Using big geosocial media metrics in urban governance , 2017, Big Data Soc..

[2]  Renée A. Irvin,et al.  Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the effort? , 2004 .

[3]  Michael Batty,et al.  Big Data and the City , 2016 .

[4]  R. Kitchin,et al.  The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism , 2013, GeoJournal.

[5]  James K. Scott “E” the People: Do U.S. Municipal Government Web Sites Support Public Involvement? , 2006 .

[6]  Yonghong Wu,et al.  Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[7]  Brian E. Weeks,et al.  Online Influence? Social Media Use, Opinion Leadership, and Political Persuasion , 2015 .

[8]  David L. Tulloch Is VGI participation? From vernal pools to video games , 2008 .

[9]  Matthew W. Wilson Flashing lights in the quantified self-city-nation , 2015 .

[10]  N. Schuurman,et al.  Implications of smartphone usage on privacy and spatial cognition: academic literature and public perceptions , 2014, GeoJournal.

[11]  Sarah Elwood,et al.  Another Politics Is Possible: Neogeographies, Visual Spatial Tactics, and Political Formation , 2013, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[12]  I. Turton,et al.  Public Participation, GIS, and Cyberdemocracy: Evaluating on-Line Spatial Decision Support Systems , 2001 .

[13]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  Towards Critical Data Studies: Charting and Unpacking Data Assemblages and Their Work , 2014 .

[14]  Matthew Zook,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Journal of Urban Technology Visualizing Global Cyberscapes: Mapping User-generated Placemarks Visualizing Global Cyberscapes: Mapping User-generated Placemarks , 2022 .

[15]  Peter A. Johnson,et al.  Tourism and environmental change in Barbados: gathering citizen perspectives with volunteered geographic information (VGI) , 2013 .

[16]  M. Janssen,et al.  Infomediary Business Models for Connecting Open Data Providers and Users , 2014 .

[17]  Gabriel Puron-Cid Smart Cities, Smart Governments and Smart Citizens: A Brief Introduction , 2015 .

[18]  Luca Mora,et al.  How to Become a Smart City: Learning from Amsterdam , 2015 .

[19]  Sören Auer,et al.  A systematic review of open government data initiatives , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[20]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[21]  I. Turton,et al.  Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environmental decision-making , 2000 .

[22]  Andrea Zanella,et al.  Internet of Things for Smart Cities , 2014, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[23]  Morten Hertzum,et al.  Does local government staff perceive digital communication with citizens as improved service? , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[24]  Karin Axelsson,et al.  Stakeholders' stake and relation to smartness in smart city development: Insights from a Swedish city planning project , 2018, Gov. Inf. Q..

[25]  Adegboyega Ojo,et al.  A social media text analytics framework for double-loop learning for citizen-centric public services: A case study of a local government Facebook use , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[26]  R. Kitchin,et al.  Being a ‘citizen’ in the smart city: up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland , 2017, GeoJournal.

[27]  Anthony Townsend,et al.  Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia , 2013 .

[28]  Dietmar Offenhuber Infrastructure legibility—a comparative analysis of open311-based citizen feedback systems , 2015 .

[29]  C. William R. Webster,et al.  Smart governance: Opportunities for technologically-mediated citizen co-production , 2018, Inf. Polity.

[30]  Peter A. Johnson Models of direct editing of government spatial data: challenges and constraints to the acceptance of contributed data , 2017 .

[31]  Sherry R. Amstein “A Ladder of Citizen Participation” , 1969 .

[32]  Luigi Fusco Girard,et al.  Toward a Smart Sustainable Development of Port Cities/Areas: The Role of the “Historic Urban Landscape” Approach , 2013 .

[33]  Christopher Ansell,et al.  Collaborative Platforms as a Governance Strategy , 2018 .

[34]  J. Glass Citizen participation in planning: the relationship between objectives and techniques. , 1979, Journal of the American Planning Association. American Planning Association.

[35]  R. E. Sieber,et al.  Conforming (to) the opposition: the social construction of geographical information systems in social movements , 2000, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[36]  Hsiaoping Yeh,et al.  The effects of successful ICT-based smart city services: From citizens' perspectives , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[37]  Adegboyega Ojo,et al.  Being smart: Emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[38]  Chorng-Shyong Ong,et al.  Managing citizen-initiated email contacts , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[39]  M. Brown,et al.  Understanding E-Government Benefits , 2007 .

[40]  Jay Nath Reimagining government in the digital age , 2011 .

[41]  Peter A. Johnson,et al.  Civic Hackathons: Innovation, Procurement, or Civic Engagement? , 2014 .

[42]  Andrés Luque-Ayala,et al.  Digital territories: Google maps as a political technique in the re-making of urban informality , 2019 .

[43]  Virginia E. Eubanks Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor , 2018 .

[44]  Casey R. Lynch Contesting Digital Futures: Urban Politics, Alternative Economies, and the Movement for Technological Sovereignty in Barcelona , 2020, Antipode.

[45]  Michael Gurstein,et al.  Open data: Empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone? , 2011, First Monday.

[46]  U. Berardi,et al.  Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives , 2015 .

[47]  Igor Calzada (Smart) Citizens from Data Providers to Decision-Makers? The Case Study of Barcelona , 2018, Sustainability.

[48]  Andrew Gray,et al.  How responsive are government agencies when contacted by email? Findings from a longitudinal study in Australia and New Zealand , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[49]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions , 2011, dg.o '11.

[50]  S. Elwood,et al.  Privacy, reconsidered: New representations, data practices, and the geoweb , 2011 .

[51]  Sun Hyoung Kim,et al.  Political polarization on twitter: Implications for the use of social media in digital governments , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[52]  S. Ranchordás Nudging citizens through technology in smart cities , 2019, International Review of Law, Computers & Technology.

[53]  Josep Blat,et al.  Leveraging explicitly disclosed location information to understand tourist dynamics: a case study , 2008, J. Locat. Based Serv..

[54]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government , 2004 .

[55]  Peter A. Johnson,et al.  Motivations driving government adoption of the Geoweb , 2012 .

[56]  Dennis Linders,et al.  From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[57]  Peter A. Johnson,et al.  A Web of Expectations: Evolving Relationships in Community Participatory Geoweb Projects. , 2015 .

[58]  Patrícia Silva,et al.  The good, the bad and the ugly: Three faces of social media usage by local governments , 2019, Gov. Inf. Q..

[59]  Greg Brown,et al.  Public Participation GIS: A new method for national park planning , 2011 .

[60]  Alex Ingrams,et al.  Mobile phones, smartphones, and the transformation of civic behavior through mobile information and connectivity , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[61]  Peter A. Johnson,et al.  Doing Public Participation on the Geospatial Web , 2016 .

[62]  Liesbet van Zoonen,et al.  Privacy concerns in smart cities , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[63]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[64]  Matthew Zook,et al.  Mapping the Data Shadows of Hurricane Sandy: Uncovering the Sociospatial Dimensions of ‘Big Data’ , 2014 .

[65]  M. Deakin,et al.  Strategic principles for smart city development: A multiple case study analysis of European best practices , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[66]  Peter A. Johnson,et al.  Strategic Choices in Developing a Geospatial Web 2.0 Application for Rural Economic Development , 2012 .

[67]  Simon Joss,et al.  Smart Cities: Towards a New Citizenship Regime? A Discourse Analysis of the British Smart City Standard , 2017 .

[68]  Linnet Taylor,et al.  Customers, Users or Citizens? Inclusion, Spatial Data and Governance in the Smart City , 2016 .

[69]  Stijn Viaene,et al.  Simple rules strategy to transform government: An ADR approach , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[70]  Jennifer S. Evans-Cowley,et al.  Using Social Media and Mobile Technologies to Foster Engagement and Self-Organization in Participatory Urban Planning and Neighbourhood Governance , 2015 .

[71]  A. Stefanidis,et al.  Harvesting ambient geospatial information from social media feeds , 2011, GeoJournal.

[72]  T. Lodato,et al.  Actually existing smart citizens , 2019, City.

[73]  K. Cox Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: looking for local politics , 1998 .

[74]  Alan Wiig The empty rhetoric of the smart city: from digital inclusion to economic promotion in Philadelphia , 2016 .

[75]  Sara Cavallo,et al.  The Digital Divide in Citizen-Initiated Government Contacts: A GIS Approach , 2014 .

[76]  Rina Ghose,et al.  Use of Information Technology for Community Empowerment: Transforming Geographic Information Systems into Community Information Systems , 2001, Trans. GIS.

[77]  Matthew Zook,et al.  The 'Actually Existing Smart City' , 2015 .

[78]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Data Collaboratives as a New Frontier of Cross-Sector Partnerships in the Age of Open Data: Taxonomy Development , 2017, HICSS.

[79]  R. Hollands Will the real smart city please stand up? , 2008, The Routledge Companion to Smart Cities.

[80]  Matthew W. Wilson Location-Based Services, Conspicuous Mobility, and the Location-Aware Future , 2012 .

[81]  Mark Graham Geography/Internet: Ethereal Alternate Dimensions of Cyberspace or Grounded Augmented Realities? , 2013 .

[82]  Carlo Ratti,et al.  Mobile Landscapes: Using Location Data from Cell Phones for Urban Analysis , 2006 .

[83]  Young Hoon Kwak,et al.  An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[84]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[85]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[86]  Daren C. Brabham Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects , 2009 .

[87]  Kevin C. Desouza,et al.  Technology-Enabled Participatory Platforms for Civic Engagement: The Case of U.S. Cities , 2014 .

[88]  Peter A. Johnson,et al.  Characterizing New Channels of Communication: A Case Study of Municipal 311 Requests in Edmonton, Canada , 2016 .

[89]  Peter A. Johnson,et al.  The Geoweb for community-based organizations: Tool development, implementation, and sustainability in an era of Google Maps , 2017, J. Community Informatics.

[90]  Teresa Scassa Sharing Data in the Platform Economy: A Public Interest Argument for Access to Platform Data , 2017 .

[91]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  Open e-government in U.S. state governments: Survey evidence from Chief Information Officers , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[92]  Mary K. Feeney,et al.  Managerial Ambivalence and Electronic Civic Engagement: The Role of Public Manager Beliefs and Perceived Needs , 2018 .

[93]  Cosmo Howard,et al.  Rethinking Government-Public Relationships in a Digital World , 2008 .

[94]  Jennifer S. Evans-Cowley Planning in the Real-Time City: The Future of Mobile Technology , 2010 .

[95]  Louise Amoore Cloud geographies , 2018, Cognitive Code.

[96]  Stefan Soeparman,et al.  Infomediaries and collaborative innovation: A case study on Information and Technology centered Intermediation in the Dutch Employment and Social Security Sector , 2009, Inf. Polity.

[97]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  Citizens' engagement on local governments' Facebook sites. An empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in Western Europe , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[98]  Mary K. Feeney,et al.  Developing and Testing an Integrative Framework for Open Government Adoption in Local Governments , 2017 .

[99]  KokkinakosPanagiotis,et al.  Citizens Collaboration and Co-Creation in Public Service Delivery , 2012 .

[100]  Peter A. Johnson,et al.  Civic open data at a crossroads: Dominant models and current challenges , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[101]  D. Boyd,et al.  CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA , 2012 .

[102]  Peter A. Johnson,et al.  Visualizing flood risk, enabling participation and supporting climate change adaptation using the Geoweb: the case of coastal communities in Nova Scotia, Canada , 2018 .

[103]  Matthew Zook,et al.  The cloud, the crowd, and the city: How new data practices reconfigure urban governance? , 2017, Big Data Soc..

[104]  Shannon Mattern,et al.  A city is not a computer , 2017, The Routledge Companion to Smart Cities.

[105]  Igor Calzada,et al.  Unplugging: Deconstructing the Smart City , 2015 .

[106]  N. Smith Contours of a Spatialized Politics: Homeless Vehicles and the Production of Geographical Scale , 1992 .

[107]  Jennifer Gabrys Programming Environments: Environmentality and Citizen Sensing in the Smart City , 2014 .

[108]  Peter A. Johnson,et al.  Assessing the Use of Government Open Data and the Role of Data Infomediaries The Case of Nova Scotia’s Community Counts Program , 2016 .

[109]  Jennifer S. Evans-Cowley,et al.  Informing and Interacting , 2005 .

[110]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..