Patient‐defined goals for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a qualitative analysis

Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) at high risk for aortic valve replacement are a unique population with multiple treatment options, including medical therapy, surgical aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Traditionally, in elderly populations, goals of treatment may favour quality of life over survival. Professional guidelines recommend that clinicians engage patients in shared decision making, a process that may lead to decisions more aligned with patient‐defined goals of care. Goals of care for high‐risk patients with AS are not well defined in the literature, and patient‐reported barriers to shared decision making highlight the need for explicit encouragement from clinicians for patient involvement.

[1]  R. Thomson,et al.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[2]  D. Frosch,et al.  Physicians' perceptions of shared decision‐making behaviours: a qualitative study demonstrating the continued chasm between aspirations and clinical practice , 2015, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[3]  M. Mack,et al.  A call for an evidence-based approach to the Heart Team for patients with severe aortic stenosis. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  P. Butow,et al.  The characteristics and effectiveness of Question Prompt List interventions in oncology: a systematic review of the literature , 2015, Psycho-oncology.

[5]  E. Hess,et al.  Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Cardiovascular Care: Past, Present, and Future , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[6]  Thoralf M Sundt,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  T. Sundt,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Circulation.

[8]  Maurice Buchbinder,et al.  Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. , 2014, Patient education and counseling.

[10]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Using a 'talk' model of shared decision making to propose an observation-based measure: Observer OPTION 5 Item. , 2013, Patient education and counseling.

[11]  E. Smets,et al.  Enhancing patient participation in oncology consultations: a best evidence synthesis of patient‐targeted interventions , 2013, Psycho-oncology.

[12]  Grace A Lin,et al.  An effort to spread decision aids in five California primary care practices yielded low distribution, highlighting hurdles. , 2013, Health affairs.

[13]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Authoritarian physicians and patients' fear of being labeled 'difficult' among key obstacles to shared decision making. , 2012, Health affairs.

[14]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Goal-oriented patient care--an alternative health outcomes paradigm. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Patient values and preferences in decision making for antithrombotic therapy: a systematic review: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2012, Chest.

[16]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Health outcome prioritization as a tool for decision making among older persons with multiple chronic conditions. , 2011, Archives of internal medicine.

[17]  Stuart J Pocock,et al.  Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Health outcome prioritization to elicit preferences of older persons with multiple health conditions. , 2011, Patient education and counseling.

[19]  T. Sensky,et al.  Treatment Goals in Addiction Healthcare: the Perspectives of Patients and Clinicians , 2011, The International journal of social psychiatry.

[20]  B. Carabello Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Who Cannot Undergo Surgery , 2011, Current cardiology reports.

[21]  W. Levinson,et al.  Not all patients want to participate in decision making , 2005, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[22]  D. Clair,et al.  Brave New Brain: Conquering Mental Illness in the Era of the Genome , 2002, Heredity.

[23]  Elizabeth H Bradley,et al.  Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  N. Wenger,et al.  End-of-life decision making , 2000, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[25]  Peter H. Ditto,et al.  Fates worse than death: the role of valued life activities in health-state evaluations. , 1996, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[26]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[27]  R. Thomson,et al.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[28]  L. Kohn,et al.  COMMITTEE ON QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE IN AMERICA , 2000 .