Prediction of lung cancer based on serum biomarkers by gene expression programming methods.

In diagnosis of lung cancer, rapid distinction between small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors is very important. Serum markers, including lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP), carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), neurone specific enolase (NSE) and Cyfra21-1, are reported to reflect lung cancer characteristics. In this study classification of lung tumors was made based on biomarkers (measured in 120 NSCLC and 60 SCLC patients) by setting up optimal biomarker joint models with a powerful computerized tool - gene expression programming (GEP). GEP is a learning algorithm that combines the advantages of genetic programming (GP) and genetic algorithms (GA). It specifically focuses on relationships between variables in sets of data and then builds models to explain these relationships, and has been successfully used in formula finding and function mining. As a basis for defining a GEP environment for SCLC and NSCLC prediction, three explicit predictive models were constructed. CEA and NSE are frequently- used lung cancer markers in clinical trials, CRP, LDH and Cyfra21-1 have significant meaning in lung cancer, basis on CEA and NSE we set up three GEP models-GEP 1(CEA, NSE, Cyfra21-1), GEP2 (CEA, NSE, LDH), GEP3 (CEA, NSE, CRP). The best classification result of GEP gained when CEA, NSE and Cyfra21-1 were combined: 128 of 135 subjects in the training set and 40 of 45 subjects in the test set were classified correctly, the accuracy rate is 94.8% in training set; on collection of samples for testing, the accuracy rate is 88.9%. With GEP2, the accuracy was significantly decreased by 1.5% and 6.6% in training set and test set, in GEP3 was 0.82% and 4.45% respectively. Serum Cyfra21-1 is a useful and sensitive serum biomarker in discriminating between NSCLC and SCLC. GEP modeling is a promising and excellent tool in diagnosis of lung cancer.

[1]  J. Jassem,et al.  [The new TNM classification in lung cancer]. , 2010, Pneumonologia i alergologia polska.

[2]  J. Coon,et al.  A multi-analyte serum test for the detection of non-small cell lung cancer , 2010, British Journal of Cancer.

[3]  Masahiro Endo,et al.  Prognostic impact of serum CYFRA 21–1 in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study , 2013, BMC Cancer.

[4]  B. Gopinath,et al.  Support Vector Machine based diagnostic system for thyroid cancer using statistical texture features. , 2013, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[5]  Eckart Meese,et al.  Identification of lung cancer with high sensitivity and specificity by blood testing , 2010, Respiratory research.

[6]  Tetsuya Shimizu,et al.  Prognostic significance of tumour marker index based on preoperative CEA and CYFRA 21-1 in non-small cell lung cancer. , 2010, Anticancer research.

[7]  Enayatollah Bakhshi,et al.  Artificial neural network for prediction of distant metastasis in colorectal cancer. , 2012, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[8]  B. Wieskopf,et al.  Cyfra 21-1 as a biologic marker of non-small cell lung cancer. Evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and prognostic role. , 1995, Chest.

[9]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  Are increasing 5-year survival rates evidence of success against cancer? , 2000, JAMA.

[10]  Yi Pan,et al.  Prediction of essential proteins based on gene expression programming , 2013, BMC Genomics.

[11]  Bo Wang,et al.  Diagnostic values of SCC, CEA, Cyfra21-1 and NSE for lung cancer in patients with suspicious pulmonary masses: A single center analysis , 2011, Cancer biology & therapy.

[12]  G. Kenter,et al.  Clinical value of pretreatment serum Cyfra 21–1, tissue polypeptide antigen, and squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels in patients with cervical cancer , 1995, Cancer.

[13]  W. Ahn,et al.  Development of Multiplexed Bead-Based Immunoassays for the Detection of Early Stage Ovarian Cancer Using a Combination of Serum Biomarkers , 2012, PloS one.

[14]  Ting Liu,et al.  Analysis of CEA expression and EGFR mutation status in non-small cell lung cancers. , 2014, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[15]  J. Entwisle,et al.  Implications of new (seventh) TNM classification of lung cancer on general radiologists--a pictorial review. , 2011, Current problems in diagnostic radiology.

[16]  J. Nevins Pathway-based classification of lung cancer: a strategy to guide therapeutic selection. , 2011, Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society.

[17]  Maciej Kusy,et al.  Application of gene expression programming and neural networks to predict adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients , 2013, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[18]  Ping Chen,et al.  Evaluation of diagnostic value of four tumor markers in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of peripheral lung cancer , 2014, Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology.

[19]  W. Cho,et al.  Potentially useful biomarkers for the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of lung cancer. , 2007, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[20]  Greg L Perkins,et al.  Serum tumor markers. , 2003, American family physician.

[21]  Irina Kusmartseva,et al.  Panel of serum biomarkers for the diagnosis of lung cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  J. Reid The classification of lung cancer. , 1963, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[23]  A. Ghaderi,et al.  Association of high LDH and low glucose levels in pleural space with HER2 expression in non-small cell lung cancer. , 2014, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[24]  N. Viñolas,et al.  Tumor Markers (CEA, CA 125, CYFRA 21-1, SCC and NSE) in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer as an Aid in Histological Diagnosis and Prognosis , 2003, Tumor Biology.

[25]  Elena Marchiori,et al.  Differences in sequencing technologies improve the retrieval of anammox bacterial genome from metagenomes , 2013, BMC Genomics.

[26]  Jai-Hyuen Lee Clinical Usefulness of Serum CYFRA 21–1 in Patients with Colorectal Cancer , 2013, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[27]  M. Zerbib,et al.  Negative prostatic biopsies in patients with a high risk of prostate cancer. Is the combination of endorectal MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) a useful tool? A preliminary study. , 2005, European urology.

[28]  B. Nakata,et al.  Serum CYFRA 21-1 (cytokeratin-19 fragments) is a useful tumour marker for detecting disease relapse and assessing treatment efficacy in breast cancer , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[29]  Yiming Wu,et al.  The Effect of Artificial Neural Network Model Combined with Six Tumor Markers in Auxiliary Diagnosis of Lung Cancer , 2012, Journal of Medical Systems.

[30]  S. Kligerman,et al.  A radiologic review of the new TNM classification for lung cancer. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[31]  R. Gray,et al.  Mass spectrometry to classify non-small-cell lung cancer patients for clinical outcome after treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a multicohort cross-institutional study. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[32]  Ulrike Tisch,et al.  Classification of lung cancer histology by gold nanoparticle sensors. , 2012, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[33]  Xiao-Ying Meng,et al.  Independent validation of candidate breast cancer serum biomarkers identified by mass spectrometry. , 2005, Clinical chemistry.

[34]  Dai Zhang,et al.  Clinical significance and prognostic value of pentraxin-3 as serologic biomarker for lung cancer. , 2013, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[35]  N. Bitterlich,et al.  Fuzzy logic-based tumor-marker profiles improved sensitivity in the diagnosis of lung cancer , 2002, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  H. Hansen,et al.  Lung cancer. , 1990, Cancer chemotherapy and biological response modifiers.

[37]  Ugur Sahin,et al.  Humoral immune responses of lung cancer patients against tumor antigen NY-ESO-1. , 2006, Cancer letters.

[38]  B. Cho,et al.  Preoperative C-reactive protein levels are associated with tumor size and lymphovascular invasion in resected non-small cell lung cancer. , 2009, Lung cancer.

[39]  Li-hua Sun,et al.  Clinical observations on the association between diagnosis of lung cancer and serum tumor markers in combination. , 2013, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[40]  Jai-Hyuen Lee,et al.  Preliminary evaluation of clinical utility of CYFRA 21-1, CA 72-4, NSE, CA19-9 and CEA in stomach cancer. , 2014, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[41]  Rachel V. Stankowski,et al.  High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a biomarker for trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity in HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer: a pilot study , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.