The influence of auditory feedback on speed choice, violations and comfort in a driving simulation game

Two experiments are reported which explore the relationships between auditory feedback (engine noise), speed choice, driving violations and driver comfort. Participants played a driving simulation game with different levels of auditory feedback in the form of engine noise. In Experiment 1, a between-subjects design revealed that no noise and low levels of engine noise (65 dB(A)) resulted in participants driving at faster speeds than in the medium (75 dB(A)) and high (85 dB(A)) levels of engine noise conditions. The low noise feedback conditions were also associated with decreases in driver comfort. Experiment 2 also demonstrated that low levels of engine noise feedback (no feedback and 70 dB(A)) were associated with increases in driving speed, and driving violations relative to higher levels of feedback (75 dB(A) and 80 dB(A)). Implications exist for current car manufacturing trends which emphasise a growing increase in noise insulation for the driver.

[1]  Seiichiro Namba,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF NOISE IN PASSENGER CARS—THE EFFECT OF VISUAL MONITORING AND THE MEASUREMENT OF HABITUATION , 1997 .

[2]  Mark S. Horswill,et al.  The development, validation, and application of a video-based technique for measuring an everyday risk-taking behavior: drivers' speed choice. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  Robert W. Allan,et al.  The Effect of a Head-up Speedometer on Speeding Behavior , 1989 .

[4]  P. Blockey,et al.  Aberrant driving behaviour: errors and violations. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[5]  G. Matthews,et al.  Task-induced fatigue states and simulated driving performance , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  Vinod Kumar Jain,et al.  A study of noise in various modes of transport in Delhi , 1994 .

[7]  H W Case,et al.  JUDGMENT OF VEHICLE SPEEDS AND TRAFFIC PATTERNS , 1972 .

[8]  Hoe C Lee,et al.  The validity of driving simulator to measure on-road driving performance of older drivers , 2002 .

[9]  Walter W. Wierwille,et al.  The Influence of Motion and Audio Cues on Driver Performance in an Automobile Simulator , 1975 .

[10]  Matthew P. Reed,et al.  Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialling task , 1999 .

[11]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  The ironies of vehicle feedback in car design , 2006, Ergonomics.

[12]  R West,et al.  Direct observation of driving, self reports of driver behaviour, and accident involvement. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[13]  Paul Wasielewski,et al.  Speed as a measure of driver risk: Observed speeds versus driver and vehicle characteristics , 1984 .

[14]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Affective evaluations of and reactions to exterior and interior vehicle auditory quality , 2002 .

[15]  R. Bisping,et al.  Car interior sound quality : experimental analysis by synthesis , 1997 .

[16]  J Rogé Spatial reference frames and driver performance. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[17]  L. Åberg,et al.  Dimensions of aberrant driver behaviour. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[18]  Michael L Matthews,et al.  The influence of vehicle type on the estimation of velocity while driving. , 1980, Ergonomics.

[19]  P. Vignal [Traffic safety]. , 1952, Gazette medicale de France.

[20]  G. Denton The influence of adaptation on subjective velocity for an observer in simulated rectilinear motion. , 1976, Ergonomics.

[21]  P. Van De Ponseele,et al.  Sound quality engineering of a virtual automobile , 2000 .

[22]  Seiichiro Namba,et al.  A cross-cultural study on noise problems: Comparison of the results obtained in Japan, West Germany, the U.S.A., China and Turkey , 1991 .

[23]  Etienne Parizet,et al.  Continuous evaluation of noise uncomfort in a bus , 2003 .

[24]  A K Lund,et al.  The mortality consequences of raising the speed limit to 65 mph on rural interstates. , 1989, American journal of public health.

[25]  T. Triggs,et al.  Time of day variations in driving performance. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Ram Bishu,et al.  Cognitive abilities in driving: Differences between normal and hazardous situations , 2004, Ergonomics.

[27]  G G Denton,et al.  A subjective scale of speed when driving a motor vehicle. , 1966, Ergonomics.

[28]  Mark S Horswill,et al.  Auditory Feedback Influences Perceived Driving Speeds , 2008, Perception.

[29]  W Schiff,et al.  Accuracy of judging time to arrival: effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Takamasa Suetomi,et al.  Subjective evaluation of engine acceleration sound with driving simulator , 2002 .

[31]  F P McKenna,et al.  The development, validation, and application of a video-based technique for measuring an everyday risk-taking behavior: drivers' speed choice. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  Seiichiro Namba,et al.  On the judgment of loudness, noisiness and annoyance with actual and artificial noises , 1988 .

[33]  H. Selye The Stress of Life , 1958 .

[34]  A. Mehrabian Individual differences in stimulus screening and arousability. , 1977, Journal of personality.