Policy Monitorhow Us Government Agencies Value Mortality Risk Reductions

One challenging task faced by US government agencies is determining whether the benefits of their proposed regulations justify the costs. For benefits associated with reducing the risks of premature mortality, they rely on an analytic construct—the value per statistical life (VSL)—which aggregates the value of small changes in mortality risk across a large population; it is not the value of saving a particular person's life. Empirical research suggests that this value ranges from roughly $1 million to $10 million per statistical life. While federal agencies usually apply values from within this range, they vary in the exact estimates used.The research literature generally addresses mortality risks and populations that differ in some significant respects from those addressed by most major regulations. A particularly contentious issue has been whether to adjust the estimates to reflect age differences. One approach involves translating VSL estimates into a value per statistical life year (VSLY) to take into account the number of years of life extension. Because the years of life extension are closely related to age, the use of a VSLY approach generally results in lower values for older individuals. However, the relationship of the VSL to age or life expectancy is complex, and such adjustments have raised significant concerns about the equitable treatment of individuals of different ages in the development of federal policy. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.

[1]  Bryan J. Hubbell,et al.  An Empirical Bayes Approach to Combining and Comparing Estimates of the Value of a Statistical Life for Environmental Policy Analysis , 2006 .

[2]  C. Olson,et al.  An Analysis of Wage Differentials Received by Workers on Dangerous Jobs , 1981 .

[3]  Henrik Andersson,et al.  The value of a statistical life , 2009, Standard Transport Appraisal Methods.

[4]  John D. Leeth,et al.  Compensating wage differentials for fatal injury risk in Australia, Japan, and the United States , 1991 .

[5]  Joseph E. Aldy,et al.  The Value of a Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates Throughout the World , 2003 .

[6]  B. Clinton,et al.  Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review , 1993 .

[7]  S. Gerking,et al.  Perceived Risk and the Marginal Value of Safety , 1991 .

[8]  Glenn C. Blomquist,et al.  Self-Protection and Averting Behavior, Values of Statistical Lives, and Benefit Cost Analysis of Environmental Policy , 2004 .

[9]  J. Leigh Gender, firm size, industry, and estimates of the value-of-life. , 1987, Journal of health economics.

[10]  Robert S. Smith,et al.  The Feasibility of an “Injury Tax” Approach to Occupational Safety , 1974 .

[11]  James K. Hammitt,et al.  Effects of Disease Type and Latency on the Value of Mortality Risk , 2003 .

[12]  Graham Loomes,et al.  THE VALUE OF PREVENTING NON-FATAL ROAD INJURIES: FINDINGS OF A WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY , 1993 .

[13]  A. Marin,et al.  The Reward for Risk in the Labor Market: Evidence from the United Kingdom and a Reconciliation with Other Studies , 1982, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  J Guria,et al.  The value of statistical life in New Zealand; market research on road safety , 1991 .

[15]  Alan E. Dillingham THE INFLUENCE OF RISK VARIABLE DEFINITION ON VALUE-OF-LIFE ESTIMATES , 1985 .

[16]  V. Smith,et al.  The implicit valuation of risks to life: A comparative analysis , 1984 .

[17]  Anne-Marie Girard,et al.  Occupational Hazard and Wage Compensating Differentials , 1992 .

[18]  Anna Alberini,et al.  Willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: Does latency matter? , 2004 .

[19]  W. Kip Viscusi,et al.  Employment Hazards: An Investigation of Market Performance , 1979 .

[20]  Viscusi Wk,et al.  Labor market valuations of life and limb: empirical evidence and policy implications. , 1978, Public policy.

[21]  Anna Alberini,et al.  Does the Value of a Statistical Life Vary with Age and Health Status? Evidence from the United States and Canada , 2004 .

[22]  G. Leopold The Federal Register. , 1979, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[23]  Michael J. Moore,et al.  Doubling the Estimated Value of Life: Results Using New Occupational Fatality Data , 1988 .

[24]  W. Viscusi,et al.  The value of risks to life and health , 1993 .

[25]  Michael Jones-Lee,et al.  The Economics Of Safety And Physical Risk , 1991 .

[26]  Ted R. Miller,et al.  Revised Costs of Large Truck-and Bus-Involved Crashes , 2002 .

[27]  H. Herzog,et al.  Valuing Risk in the Workplace: Market Price, Willingness to Pay, and the Optimal Provision of Safety , 1990 .

[28]  V.Kerry Smith,et al.  The role of site and job characteristics in hedonic wage models , 1983 .

[29]  Laura O. Taylor,et al.  What Determines the Value of Life: A Meta‐Analysis , 2002 .

[30]  Kelly B. Maguire,et al.  Willingness to Pay for Environmental Health Risk Reductions when there are Varying Degrees of Life Expectancy: A White Paper , 2006 .

[31]  Bar code label requirement for human drug products and biological products. Final rule. , 2004, Federal register.

[32]  G. Guenther Occupational Safety and Health Act. , 1972, Health devices.

[33]  U. Epa,et al.  Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Clean Air Interstate Rule , 2005 .

[34]  William D. Schulze,et al.  The marginal value of job safety: A contingent valuation study , 1988 .

[35]  T. Miller The Plausible Range for the Value of Life––Red Herrings Among the Mackerel , 1990 .

[36]  John E. Garen,et al.  Compensating Wage Differentials and the Endogeneity of Job Riskiness , 1988 .

[37]  W. Viscusi Fatal Tradeoffs: Public and Private Responsibilities for Risk , 1992 .

[38]  Ted R. Miller,et al.  THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES, 2000 , 2002 .