First-Time Adoption of IFRS, Managerial Incentives and Value- Relevance: Some French Evidence

This paper investigates whether and how managerial incentives influence the decision to elect optional exemptions when first adopting International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). It also examines the value-relevance of the mandatory and optional equity adjustments that must be recognized as a result of the first-time adoption of IFRS. Both questions are addressed in the context of the mandatory adoption of IFRS by French firms in 2005. Three major findings emerge from our analyses. First, managerial incentives influence the decision to strategically elect one or more optional exemptions at the transition date. Second, mandatory equity adjustments are more valued than French GAAP equity, suggesting that the first-time adoption of IFRS by French firms is perceived as a signal of an increase in the quality of their financial statements. Third, the value-relevance of optional IFRS equity adjustments depends on whether they result in the disclosure of new information.

[1]  Michelle H. Yetman,et al.  How Representative are Firms that are Cross Listed in the United States? An Analysis of Accounting Quality , 2003 .

[2]  Anne Beatty,et al.  Accounting Discretion in Fair Value Estimates: An Examination of SFAS 142 Goodwill Impairments , 2006 .

[3]  B. Lev,et al.  Value-Relevance of Nonfinancial Information: The Wireless Communications Industry , 1996 .

[4]  D. Collins,et al.  Equity Valuation and Negative Earnings , 1996 .

[5]  Mark L. DeFond,et al.  Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals , 1994 .

[6]  PLANT and equipment. , 2003, Manufacturing chemist and aerosol news.

[7]  Naomi S. Soderstrom,et al.  IFRS Adoption and Accounting Quality: A Review , 2007 .

[8]  M. Boukari,et al.  L’impact des normes IFRS sur les données comptables des groupes français cotés , 2007 .

[9]  Stephen J. Brown,et al.  Use of R-Squared in Accounting Research: Measuring Changes in Value Relevance Over the Last Four Decades , 1998 .

[10]  Ross L. Watts,et al.  Positive Accounting Theory: A Ten Year Perspective , 2006 .

[11]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality , 2007 .

[12]  Victor L. Bernard,et al.  The Feltham-Ohlson Framework: Implications for Empiricists* , 1995 .

[13]  Mingyi Hung,et al.  Financial statement effects of adopting international accounting standards: the case of Germany , 2007 .

[14]  Daniel W. Collins,et al.  Equity Valuation and Negative Earnings: The Role of Book Value of Equity , 1999 .

[15]  George Serafeim,et al.  Market reaction to and valuation of IFRS reconciliation adjustments: first evidence from the UK , 2010 .

[16]  Ole‐Kristian Hope,et al.  Differences between Domestic Accounting Standards and IAS: Measurement, Determinants and Implications , 2006 .

[17]  S. P. Kothari,et al.  The Effect of International Institutional Factors on Properties of Accounting Earnings , 1999 .

[18]  A. Morais,et al.  Accounting quality and the adoption of IASB standards: portuguese evidence , 2008 .

[19]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  SFAS No. 123 Stock‐Based Compensation Expense and Equity Market Values , 2004 .

[20]  Ross L. Watts,et al.  Towards A Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards , 2006 .

[21]  Axel Haller,et al.  International accounting. 2nd edition , 2003 .

[22]  A. Jorissen,et al.  International Accounting Standards , 2009 .