Dealing with subjectivity in early product design phase: A systematic approach to exploit Quality Function Deployment potentials

Quality Function Deployment (QFD), as a customer-driven tool, is generally used in the early phase of new or improved products/services design process, and therefore most of the input parameters are highly subjective in nature. The five major input components of the QFD, which are laid in the House of Quality (HOQ), namely, the customer requirement, the technical attribute, the relationship matrix, the correlation matrix, and the benchmarking information, play a central role in determining the success of QFD team. Accurate numerical judgment representations are of high importance for the QFD team to fill in the values of each of those components. In this paper, a generic network model, based on Analytic Network Process (ANP) framework, will be proposed to systematically take into account the interrelationship between and within those components simultaneously and finally derive their relative contribution. In particular, with respect to a rapidly changing market, the incorporation of the new product development risk, the competitors' benchmarking information, and the feedback information into the network model may be considered as a novel contribution in QFD literature. Not only does this network model improve the QFD results' accuracy, but it also serves as a generalized model of the use of ANP in QFD with respect to the previous research. A simple illustrative example of the proposed network model will be provided to give some practical insights.

[1]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  Fuzzy multiple objective programming framework to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment , 2004, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[2]  Fariborz Y. Partovi,et al.  An analytical model of process choice in the chemical industry , 2007 .

[3]  Kwang-Jae Kim,et al.  Determination of an Optimal Set of Design Requirements Using House of Quality , 1998 .

[4]  Sevin Sozer,et al.  Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach , 2003 .

[5]  M. Tuominen,et al.  Benchmarking logistics performance with an application of the analytic hierarchy process , 1996 .

[6]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[7]  Jonathan F. Bard,et al.  A tradeoff analysis for rough terrain cargo handlers using the AHP: an example of group decision making , 1990 .

[8]  John W. Fowler,et al.  A hybrid approach using the analytic hierarchy process and integer programming to screen weapon systems projects , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[9]  T. Saaty Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process , 1986 .

[10]  Christian N. Madu,et al.  Strategic total quality management , 1998 .

[11]  Ernest H. Forman,et al.  Group decision support with the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1992, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  Donald H. Liles,et al.  A soft-systems methodology approach for product and process innovation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[13]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  Quality Function Deployment: A Comprehensive Review of Its Concepts and Methods , 2002 .

[14]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  T. Saaty,et al.  Procedures for Synthesizing Ratio Judgements , 1983 .

[16]  T. Saaty Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2000 .

[17]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and its Applications , 1986 .

[18]  D. K. Pal,et al.  Rapid tooling route selection for metal casting using QFD–ANP methodology , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[19]  C K Kwong,et al.  Determining the Importance Weights for the Customer Requirements in QFD Using a Fuzzy AHP with an Extent Analysis Approach , 2003 .

[20]  Michael A. Mullens,et al.  AN AHP FRAMEWORK FOR PRIORITIZING CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS IN QFD: AN INDUSTRIALIZED HOUSING APPLICATION , 1994 .

[21]  Li Lin,et al.  Modeling team member characteristics for the formation of a multifunctional team in concurrent engineering , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[22]  Chelsea C. White,et al.  Key factors in the successful application of quality function deployment (QFD) , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[23]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Priority setting in complex problems , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[24]  Zenon S. Zannetos,et al.  Strategies for Productivity , 1984 .

[25]  J. Mullins,et al.  New Product Development in Rapidly Changing Markets: An Exploratory Study , 1998 .

[26]  S. Chopra,et al.  Managing Risk To Avoid Supply-Chain Breakdown , 2004 .

[27]  Jiafu Tang,et al.  Rating technical attributes in fuzzy QFD by integrating fuzzy weighted average method and fuzzy expected value operator , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Da Ruan,et al.  Determining the importance weights for the design requirements in the house of quality using the fuzzy analytic network approach , 2004 .

[29]  Kirti Peniwati,et al.  Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  The Voice of the Customer , 1993 .

[31]  Mohamed Zairi,et al.  The art of benchmarking: Using customer feedback to establish a performance gap , 1992 .

[32]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  M. Lu,et al.  Integrating QFD, AHP and Benchmarking in Strategic Marketing , 1994 .

[34]  M. A. Mustafa,et al.  Project risk assessment using the analytic hierarchy process , 1991 .

[35]  Richard Y. K. Fung,et al.  Fuzzy regression-based mathematical programming model for quality function deployment , 2004 .

[36]  Da Ruan,et al.  Determining the importance weights for the design requirements in the house of quality using the fuzzy analytic network approach , 2004, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[37]  James R. Evans,et al.  Testing the relationship between team and partner characteristics and cooperative benchmarking outcomes , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[38]  Muammer Ozer,et al.  Factors which influence decision making in new product evaluation , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[39]  Peter J. M. Sonnemans,et al.  Quality and Reliability Problems from a Consumer's Perspective: an Increasing Problem Overlooked by Businesses? , 2006, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[40]  Yuan Lu,et al.  Towards a more systematic analysis of uncertain user–product interactions in product development: an enhanced user–product interaction framework , 2007, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[41]  T. Saaty,et al.  Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks , 1986 .

[42]  Da Ruan,et al.  Quality function deployment implementation based on analytic network process with linguistic data: An application in automotive industry , 2005, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[43]  Aaron Marcus The out-of-box home experience: remote from reality , 2005, INTR.

[44]  P. Finch Supply chain risk management , 2004 .

[45]  Gerald W. Evans,et al.  Fuzzy multicriteria models for quality function deployment , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[46]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  Quality function deployment: A literature review , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[47]  Jennifer S. Shang,et al.  A unified framework for multicriteria evaluation of transportation projects , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[48]  Euiho Suh,et al.  Prioritizing telecommunications technologies for long-range R&D planning to the year 2006 , 1994 .

[49]  Prasanta Kumar Dey,et al.  Decision support system for inspection and maintenance: a case study of oil pipelines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[50]  William Ho,et al.  Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[51]  Fariborz Y. Partovi,et al.  An analytic model for locating facilities strategically , 2006 .

[52]  Jay R. Rajasekera,et al.  Outline of a quality plan for industrial research and development projects , 1990 .

[53]  Ozden Ustun,et al.  Analytic network process and multi-period goal programming integration in purchasing decisions , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[54]  Jim Joop Halman,et al.  From experience : applying the risk diagnosing methodology , 2002 .

[55]  T. Saaty There is no mathematical validity for using fuzzy number crunching in the analytic hierarchy process , 2006 .

[56]  Louis Cohen,et al.  Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You , 1995 .

[57]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[58]  R. Camp Business process benchmarking : finding and implementing best practices , 1995 .

[59]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Products: What Separates Winners from Losers? , 1987 .

[60]  Pekka Ketola Special issue on out-of-box experience and consumer devices , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[61]  Geoffrey Cannon Out of box. , 2007 .

[62]  ARMEN Zzkarian,et al.  Forming teams: an analytical approach , 1999 .

[63]  Deok-Hwan Kim,et al.  Robust QFD: framework and a case study , 2007, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[64]  J. Hauser,et al.  The House of Quality , 1988 .

[65]  Jason W. Fouts On site: an “out-of-box” experience , 2000, CACM.

[66]  Y. Chen,et al.  A methodology of determining aggregated importance of engineering characteristics in QFD , 2007, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[67]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Group decision making to better respond customer needs in software development , 2005, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[68]  Peter J. M. Sonnemans,et al.  Managing product reliability in business processes 'under pressure' , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[69]  E. Melachrinoudis,et al.  The prioritization of technologies in a research laboratory , 1991 .

[70]  Roger Calantone,et al.  Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in New Product Screening , 1999 .

[71]  J. Sarkis,et al.  Evaluation of enterprise information technologies: a decision model for high-level consideration of strategic and operational issues , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[72]  Chun Hu,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process with fuzzy scoring in evaluating multidisciplinary R&D projects in China , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[73]  Adrien Presley,et al.  R&D project selection using the analytic network process , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[74]  Richard Y. K. Fung,et al.  Estimating the functional relationships for quality function deployment under uncertainties , 2006, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[75]  R. Cooper,et al.  Benchmarking the Firm's Critical Success Factors in New Product Development , 1995 .

[76]  Gülser Köksal,et al.  Planning and design of industrial engineering education quality , 1998 .

[77]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Analyzing alternatives in reverse logistics for end-of-life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approach , 2005, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[78]  Jim Joop Halman,et al.  Risks in New Product Development: Devising a Reference Tool , 2005 .

[79]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Strategic analysis of logistics and supply chain management systems using the analytical network process , 1998 .

[80]  Peter Fraser,et al.  Shifting paradigms of product development in fast and dynamic markets , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[81]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Diagnosis with Dependent Symptoms: Bayes Theorem and the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1998, Oper. Res..

[82]  George Q. Huang,et al.  Synchronous quality function deployment (QFD) over world wide web , 2002 .

[83]  Thong Ngee Goh,et al.  Advanced Qfd Applications , 2003 .

[84]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  Customer-driven product development through quality function deployment in the u.s. and japan , 2000 .

[85]  Christopher S. Tang Perspectives in supply chain risk management , 2006 .

[86]  A. Griffin Evaluating QFD's Use in US Firms as a Process for Developing Products , 1992 .

[87]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  Framework of a fuzzy quality function deployment system , 1996 .

[88]  Thong Ngee Goh,et al.  Prioritizing processes in initial implementation of statistical process control , 1998 .

[89]  A. Griffin,et al.  Patterns of Communication Among Marketing, Engineering and Manufacturing-A Comparison Between Two New Product Teams , 1992 .

[90]  Matthew J. Liberatore,et al.  An extension of the analytic hierarchy process for industrial R&D project selection and resource allocation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.