Towards an express-diagnostics for level of processing and hazard perception

Abstract The analysis of eye movements can provide rich information about driver's attention and the course of behaviour in hazardous situations. We present data from a driving simulation study showing that the switching between preattentive and attentive processing is reflected in visual fixations. For this initial analysis, we considered fixations from the perspective of their duration and the amplitude of related saccades. Since fixation durations may change instantaneously from one fixation to the next, we further selected the temporal vicinity of the emerging hazard for a closer analysis of fixations around this time. With this second type of analysis, the fixations that actually “detect” a critical event can be discovered and their duration measured. Upon detection of an immediate hazard, there is an increase in fixation duration and a corresponding increase in occurrence of attentive fixations on the cost of preattentive ones. This switching from one level of processing to another is recognisable on a short, phasic time scale. We finally discuss attentional conditions where overlooked or not sufficiently processed hazards do not lead to the appropriate breaking reaction on the part of the driver.

[1]  Boris M. Velichkovsky,et al.  Visual fixations and level of attentional processing , 2000, ETRA.

[2]  Y Nagayama ROLE OF VISUAL PERCEPTION IN DRIVING , 1978 .

[3]  Marc Pomplun,et al.  Analysis and models of eye movements in comparative visual search , 1998 .

[4]  N. Moray Designing for attention. , 1993 .

[5]  C. Trevarthen,et al.  Two mechanisms of vision in primates , 1968, Psychologische Forschung.

[6]  James E. Hoffman,et al.  2. Stages of processing in visual search and attention , 1999 .

[7]  B. Velichkovsky Levels of processing: Validating the concept , 2001 .

[8]  Bradford H. Challis,et al.  Stratification in cognition and consciousness , 1999 .

[9]  Boris M. Velichkovsky,et al.  Change detection and occlusion modes in road-traffic scenarios , 2002 .

[10]  J R Treat,et al.  TRI-LEVEL STUDY OF THE CAUSES OF TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS. VOLUME II: SPECIAL ANALYSES , 1977 .

[11]  Sebastian Pannasch,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(01)00207-3 , 2001 .

[12]  Boris M. Velichkovsky,et al.  In search of the ultimate evidence: The fastest visual reaction adapts to environment, not retinal locations , 2001 .

[13]  F P McKenna,et al.  HAZARD PERCEPTION: CAN IT BE TRAINED? , 1992 .

[14]  J. W. Senders,et al.  HUMAN ERROR IN ROAD ACCIDENTS , 1999 .

[15]  B. Velichkovsky Visual cognition and its spatial-temporal context , 1982 .

[16]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[17]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Attention: Selection, Awareness, and Control , 1993 .

[18]  G. Underwood,et al.  Visual Search of Dynamic Scenes , 1998 .

[19]  M. Pickering,et al.  Eye guidance in reading and scene perception , 1998 .

[20]  A. Mack Inattentional Blindness , 2003 .

[21]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  The time course of a lane change: Driver control and eye-movement behavior , 2002 .