Reducing the greenhouse gas footprint of primary metal production: Where should the focus be?

Abstract The mineral processing and metal production sector is endeavouring to identify opportunities to improve the sustainability of its operations and reduce its greenhouse gas footprint, with improved energy efficiency receiving increased attention. However, if truly sustainable outcomes are to be obtained it is essential that a life cycle approach be adopted in evaluating these opportunities. In this paper, life cycle assessment methodology is used to indicate where in the metal production life cycle this focus on energy efficiency should be and to evaluate a number of potential opportunities for reducing the greenhouse gas footprint of primary metal production. Results from life cycle assessments of the main primary metal production processes, together with current and predicted global metal production rates, ore grades and grind or liberation size, have been used in a broad analysis to indicate that endeavours to improve the energy efficiency of primary metal production should focus mainly on the metal extraction stage, particularly for steel and aluminium. Declining ore grades and more complex ore bodies anticipated in the future can be expected to significantly increase the energy required for comminution of the main metal ores and will present opportunities for improving the energy efficiency of primary metal production. However, these opportunities will still be appreciably less than potential energy efficiency improvements in the extraction stage for these metals.

[1]  Douglas W. Fuerstenau,et al.  The energy efficiency of ball milling in comminution , 2002 .

[2]  W.K. Gwarek,et al.  A review of microwave power applications in industry and research , 2004, 15th International Conference on Microwaves, Radar and Wireless Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04EX824).

[3]  Mohammad Zandi,et al.  Biomass for iron ore sintering. , 2010 .

[4]  Subagyo,et al.  Energy considerations for alternative routes in metals production , 2002 .

[5]  Sharif Jahanshahi,et al.  Low grade ores – Smelt, leach or concentrate? , 2010 .

[6]  K. Halada,et al.  Forecasting of the Consumption of Metals up to 2050 , 2007 .

[8]  S. Komar Kawatra,et al.  Advances in comminution , 2006 .

[9]  Gavin M. Mudd,et al.  Environmental sustainability metrics for nickel sulphide versus nickel laterite , 2008 .

[10]  Terry Norgate,et al.  Environmental and Economic Aspects of Charcoal Use in Steelmaking , 2009 .

[11]  Fengnian Shi,et al.  Comparison of energy efficiency between ball mills and stirred mills in coarse grinding , 2009 .

[12]  C. S. Ek,et al.  Energy Usage in Mineral Processing , 1986 .

[13]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  The Integration of Economic and Social Aspects in Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2006 .

[14]  M Daniel,et al.  EFFICIENCY, ECONOMICS, ENERGY AND EMISSIONS - EMERGING CRITERIA FOR COMMINUTION CIRCUIT DECISION MAKING , 2010 .

[15]  T. Norgate,et al.  Assessing the environmental impact of metal production processes , 2007 .

[16]  Xu Qing-xi,et al.  The past and the future of nickel laterites , 2005 .

[17]  Chiranjib Kumar Gupta,et al.  Chemical Metallurgy: Principles and Practice , 2002 .

[18]  Rob Morrison,et al.  A more sustainable approach to assessing comminution efficiency , 2009 .