A framework based on 2‐D Taylor expansion for quantifying the impacts of subpixel reflectance variance and covariance on cloud optical thickness and effective radius retrievals based on the bispectral method

The bi-spectral method retrieves cloud optical thickness (τ) and cloud droplet effective radius (r e ) simultaneously from a pair of cloud reflectance observations, one in a visible or near infrared (VIS/NIR) band and the other in a shortwave-infrared (SWIR) band. A cloudy pixel is usually assumed to be horizontally homogeneous in the retrieval. Ignoring sub-pixel variations of cloud reflectances can lead to a significant bias in the retrieved τ and r e . In the literature, the retrievals of τ and r e are often assumed to be independent and considered separately when investigating the impact of sub-pixel cloud reflectance variations on the bi-spectral method. As a result, the impact on τ is contributed only by the sub-pixel variation of VIS/NIR band reflectance and the impact on r e only by the sub-pixel variation of SWIR band reflectance. In our new framework, we use the Taylor expansion of a two-variable function to understand and quantify the impacts of sub-pixel variances of VIS/NIR and SWIR cloud reflectances and their covariance on the τ and r e retrievals. This framework takes into account the fact that the retrievals are determined by both VIS/NIR and SWIR band observations in a mutually dependent way. In comparison with previous studies, it provides a more comprehensive understanding of how sub-pixel cloud reflectance variations impact the τ and r e retrievals based on the bi-spectral method. In particular, our framework provides a mathematical explanation of how the sub-pixel variation in VIS/NIR band influences the r e retrieval and why it can sometimes outweigh the influence of variations in the SWIR band and dominate the error in r e retrievals, leading to a potential contribution of positive bias to the r e retrieval. We test our framework using synthetic cloud fields from a large-eddy simulation and real observations from MODIS. The predicted results based on our framework agree very well with the numerical simulations. Our framework can be used to estimate the retrieval uncertainty from sub-pixel reflectance variations in operational satellite cloud products and to help understand the differences in τ and r e retrievals between two instruments.

[1]  Steven Platnick,et al.  Impact of three‐dimensional radiative effects on satellite retrievals of cloud droplet sizes , 2006 .

[2]  Observations of Three-Dimensional Radiative Effects That Influence Satellite Retrievals of Cloud Properties , 2013 .

[3]  Seiji Kato,et al.  Estimate of satellite‐derived cloud optical thickness and effective radius errors and their effect on computed domain‐averaged irradiances , 2006 .

[4]  Sally A. McFarlane,et al.  Albedo bias and the horizontal variability of clouds in subtropical marine boundary layers: Observations from ships and satellites , 1999 .

[5]  M. Lebsock,et al.  Frequency and causes of failed MODIS cloud property retrievals for liquid phase clouds over global oceans , 2015, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.

[6]  Steven Platnick,et al.  View‐angle consistency in reflectance, optical thickness and spherical albedo of marine water‐clouds over the northeastern Pacific through MISR‐MODIS fusion , 2009 .

[7]  Rob Roebeling,et al.  Cloud property retrievals for climate monitoring: Implications of differences between Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI) on METEOSAT‐8 and Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) on NOAA‐17 , 2006 .

[8]  Paquita Zuidema,et al.  Assessment of MODIS cloud effective radius and optical thickness retrievals over the Southeast Pacific with VOCALS‐REx in situ measurements , 2011 .

[9]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  3‐D aerosol‐cloud radiative interaction observed in collocated MODIS and ASTER images of cumulus cloud fields , 2007 .

[10]  Steven Platnick,et al.  Effects of Cloud Horizontal Inhomogeneity and Drizzle on Remote Sensing of Cloud Droplet Effective Radius: Case Studies Based on Large-eddy Simulations , 2012 .

[11]  Steven Platnick,et al.  A global view of one‐dimensional solar radiative transfer through oceanic water clouds , 2010 .

[12]  H. Barker,et al.  A Parameterization for Computing Grid-Averaged Solar Fluxes for Inhomogeneous Marine Boundary Layer Clouds. Part II: Validation Using Satellite Data , 1996 .

[13]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Effects of Domain Size and Numerical Resolution on the Simulation of Shallow Cumulus Convection , 2002 .

[14]  Alexander Marshak,et al.  Observations of Three-Dimensional Radiative Effects that Influence MODIS Cloud Optical Thickness Retrievals , 2002 .

[15]  M. King,et al.  Determination of the optical thickness and effective particle radius of clouds from reflected solar , 1990 .

[16]  H. Barker A parameterization for computing grid-averaged solar fluxes for inhomogeneous marine boundary layer , 1996 .

[17]  Zhibo Zhang On the sensitivity of cloud effective radius retrieval based on spectral method to bi-modal droplet size distribution: A semi-analytical model , 2013 .

[18]  R. Davies,et al.  Plane Parallel Albedo Biases from Satellite Observations. Part II: Parameterizations for Bias Removal. , 1998 .

[19]  Harshvardhan,et al.  Comments on ``The Parameterization of Radiation for Numerical Weather Prediction and Climate Models'' , 1985 .

[20]  A. Marshak,et al.  Solar radiation transport in the cloudy atmosphere: a 3D perspective on observations and climate impacts , 2010 .

[21]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  The MODIS cloud products: algorithms and examples from Terra , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[22]  Andi Walther,et al.  Implementation of the Daytime Cloud Optical and Microphysical Properties Algorithm (DCOMP) in PATMOS-x , 2012 .

[23]  Larry Di Girolamo,et al.  A global analysis on the view‐angle dependence of plane‐parallel oceanic liquid water cloud optical thickness using data synergy from MISR and MODIS , 2013 .

[24]  Steven Platnick,et al.  An assessment of differences between cloud effective particle radius retrievals for marine water clouds from three MODIS spectral bands , 2011 .

[25]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  The Plane-parallel Albedo Bias of Liquid Clouds from MODIS Observations , 2007 .

[26]  M. King,et al.  Determination of the Optical Thickness and Effective Particle Radius of Clouds from Reflected Solar Radiation Measurements. Part II: Marine Stratocumulus Observations , 1991 .

[27]  Robert Pincus,et al.  Computational Cost and Accuracy in Calculating Three-Dimensional Radiative Transfer: Results for New Implementations of Monte Carlo and SHDOM , 2009 .

[28]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate forcing , 2004, Nature.

[29]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  Fractal Statistics of Cloud Fields , 1989 .

[30]  Peter Pilewskie,et al.  Microphysical and radiative properties of boundary layer stratiform clouds deduced from ground‐based measurements , 1997 .

[31]  K. Stamnes,et al.  Numerically stable algorithm for discrete-ordinate-method radiative transfer in multiple scattering and emitting layered media. , 1988, Applied optics.

[32]  Guangyu Zhao,et al.  Cloud fraction errors for trade wind cumuli from EOS‐Terra instruments , 2006 .

[33]  Larry Di Girolamo,et al.  Bias in MODIS cloud drop effective radius for oceanic water clouds as deduced from optical thickness variability across scattering angles , 2015 .

[34]  Roger Davies,et al.  Plane Parallel Albedo Biases from Satellite Observations. Part I: Dependence on Resolution and Other Factors , 1998 .

[35]  Sunny Sun-Mack,et al.  CERES Edition-2 Cloud Property Retrievals Using TRMM VIRS and Terra and Aqua MODIS Data—Part I: Algorithms , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[36]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  The albedo of fractal stratocumulus clouds , 1994 .