Ambidexterity and IT competence can improve supply chain flexibility? A resource orchestration approach

Abstract Supply chain flexibility (SCF) has become an important competitive weapon for companies in the current dynamic environment. This paper explores the influence of ambidexterity on supply chain flexibility (SCF) and theorizes the moderating effect of information technology (IT) competence on that relationship. Whereas prior research focuses on the positive results of SCF for business performance, little empirical research has studied its facilitators, leaving the gap this study seeks to fill. We draw on resource orchestration theory to develop our research model. According to this theory, a firm can exploit the full potential of its resources and capabilities only when these are deployed in a complementary manner. This study proposes that ambidexterity impacts SCF positively and that its effect is amplified when the firm possesses IT competence. In order to test our hypotheses we have employed a hierarchical regression methodology and put into service data collected from manufacturing enterprises. The study confirms that ambidexterity, as the ability to explore and exploit SC resources, enables their orchestration, making SC resources flexible, and a high IT competence facilitates that orchestration.

[1]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[2]  Vanesa Barrales-Molina,et al.  The influence of manufacturing flexibility on strategic behaviours , 2014 .

[3]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment , 2001 .

[4]  Vinit Parida,et al.  Nonlinear Effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Small Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Resource Orchestration Capabilities , 2013 .

[5]  Katrina Lintukangas,et al.  The underlying potential of supply management in value creation , 2012 .

[6]  Keely L. Croxton,et al.  ENSURING SUPPLY CHAIN RESILIENCE: DEVELOPMENT OF A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK , 2010 .

[7]  D. Gerwin.  Manufacturing flexibility: a strategic perspective , 1993 .

[8]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[9]  Sengun Yeniyurt,et al.  THE IMPACT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ON SUPPLY CHAIN CAPABILITIES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: A RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2006 .

[10]  Jan Stentoft Arlbjørn,et al.  Backshoring manufacturing: Notes on an important but under-researched theme , 2014 .

[11]  D. Luzzini,et al.  Assessing the use of External Grand Theories in Purchasing and Supply Management research , 2016 .

[12]  Martin Christopher,et al.  Logistics and supply chain management : creating value-adding networks , 2005 .

[13]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[14]  J. Jaccard,et al.  Interaction effects in multiple regression , 1992 .

[15]  Alan W. Mackelprang,et al.  Are internal manufacturing and external supply chain flexibilities complementary capabilities , 2012 .

[16]  Dovev Lavie,et al.  Ambidexterity Under Scrutiny: Exploration and Exploitation Via Internal Organization, Alliances, and Acquisitions , 2014 .

[17]  Michael J. Braunscheidel,et al.  The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response , 2009 .

[18]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  The role of IT application orchestration capability in improving agility and performance , 2017, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[19]  D. Luzzini,et al.  Organizing IT purchases: Evidence from a global study , 2014 .

[20]  Marjolein C.J. Caniëls,et al.  Supply chain flexibility A systematic literature review and identification of directions for future research , 2017 .

[21]  Cristina Gimenez,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of supply flexibility sources: an empirical research , 2009 .

[22]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[23]  Clay M. Voorhees,et al.  Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies , 2016 .

[24]  Kevin Zhu,et al.  Research Note - Do Electronic Linkages Reduce the Bullwhip Effect? An Empirical Analysis of the U.S. Manufacturing Supply Chains , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  R. Duane Ireland,et al.  Resource Orchestration to Create Competitive Advantage , 2010 .

[26]  Kuechle Graciela,et al.  Prediction‐ and Control‐Based Strategies in Entrepreneurship: The Role of Information , 2016 .

[27]  Kenneth K. Boyer,et al.  Innovation-supportive culture: The impact of organizational values on process innovation , 2007 .

[28]  Jing Zhao,et al.  The effects of e-business processes in supply chain operations: Process component and value creation mechanisms , 2020, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[29]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  Enhancing effects of manufacturing flexibility through operational absorptive capacity and operational ambidexterity , 2012 .

[30]  Pankaj Setia,et al.  How information systems help create OM capabilities: Consequents and antecedents of operational absorptive capacity , 2013 .

[31]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[32]  Manuel Sánchez-Pérez,et al.  Inter‐organizational governance, learning and performance in supply chains , 2010 .

[33]  J. MacKinnon,et al.  Estimation and inference in econometrics , 1994 .

[34]  Wendy L. Tate,et al.  Factor‐Market Rivalry and Competition for Supply Chain Resources , 2013 .

[35]  M. Tushman,et al.  The ambidextrous organization. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[36]  R. Sohi,et al.  IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? , 2003 .

[37]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[38]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  Manufacturing process flexibility revisited , 2005 .

[39]  Robert J. Vokurka,et al.  A conceptual model of supply chain flexibility , 2003, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[40]  J. Whitehead,et al.  Action research in organisations , 2000 .

[41]  N. Suresh,et al.  An empirical investigation of the impact of strategic sourcing and flexibility on firm's supply chain agility , 2012 .

[42]  J. B. Ramsey,et al.  Tests for Specification Errors in Classical Linear Least‐Squares Regression Analysis , 1969 .

[43]  María Leticia Santos-Vijande,et al.  How organizational learning affects a firm's flexibility, competitive strategy, and performance☆ , 2012 .

[44]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[45]  Sven C. Voelpel,et al.  Strategic Management as Organizational Learning: Developing Fit and Alignment through a Disciplined Process , 2005 .

[46]  D. Teece,et al.  Cross-border Market Co-creation, Dynamic Capabilities and the Entrepreneurial Theory of the Multinational Enterprise , 2010 .

[47]  Eric W. T. Ngai,et al.  Information technology, operational, and management competencies for supply chain agility: Findings from case studies , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[48]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: An Empirical Evaluation , 1994, MIS Q..

[49]  Eric W. T. Ngai,et al.  An instrument for measuring supply chain flexibility for the textile and clothing companies , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[50]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[51]  Gautam Ray,et al.  Information Technology and the Performance of the Customer Service Process: A Resource-Based Analysis , 2005, MIS Q..

[52]  M. Stevenson,et al.  Flexibility from a supply chain perspective: definition and review , 2007 .

[53]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Fortune favors the prepared firm , 1994 .

[54]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[55]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[56]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Clarifying the Distinctive Contribution of Ambidexterity to the Field of Organization Studies , 2013 .

[57]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  The Impact of IT Capabilities on Firm Performance: The Mediating Roles of Absorptive Capacity and Supply Chain Agility , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[58]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[59]  Marjolein C. J. Caniëls,et al.  Exploring supply chain flexibility in a FMCG food supply chain , 2016 .

[60]  Matteo Giacomo Maria Kalchschmidt,et al.  Exploration and exploitation within supply networks: Examining purchasing ambidexterity and its multiple performance implications , 2018 .

[61]  Benyamin B. Lichtenstein,et al.  The Role of Organizational Learning in the Opportunity–Recognition Process , 2005 .

[62]  Hefu Liu,et al.  The configuration between supply chain integration and information technology competency: A resource orchestration perspective , 2016 .

[63]  H. Teo,et al.  The effects of retail channel integration through the use of information technologies on firm performance , 2012 .

[64]  J. Moyano-Fuentes,et al.  Mediating and non-linear relationships among supply chain integration dimensions , 2018, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.

[65]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[66]  Vicky Ching Gu,et al.  The effects of organizational culture and environmental pressures on IT project performance: A moderation perspective , 2014 .

[67]  J. Swart,et al.  Mechanisms for Managing Ambidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda , 2013 .

[68]  Arawati Agus,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, SUPPLY CHAIN FLEXIBILITY AND BUSINESS PERFORMANCE , 2011 .

[69]  Antonio J. Verdú,et al.  The moderating effect of innovative capacity on the relationship between real options and strategic flexibility , 2010 .

[70]  Kai Xu,et al.  A current view of resource based theory in operations management: A response to Bromiley and Rau , 2016 .

[71]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[72]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[73]  Patrick Mikalef,et al.  Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA , 2017 .

[74]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Adding Interpersonal Learning and Tacit Knowledge to March's Exploration-Exploitation Model , 2006 .

[75]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box , 2007 .

[76]  Silvio Popadiuk,et al.  International Journal of Information Management Scale for Classifying Organizations as Explorers, Exploiters or Ambidextrous , 2022 .

[77]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  Toward a “Theoretical Toolbox” for the Supplier-Enabled Fuzzy Front End of the New Product Development Process , 2016 .

[78]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[79]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings , 1988, MIS Q..

[80]  Elizabeth M. Daniel,et al.  The role of emergent information technologies and systems in enabling supply chain agility , 2005, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[81]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  The relationship between supply chain manager capabilities and performance: empirical evidence , 2016 .

[82]  Maria Nieves Perez-Arostegui,et al.  Supply chain flexibility in dynamic environments: The enabling role of operational absorptive capacity and organisational learning , 2018 .

[83]  Kim Hua Tan,et al.  Leveraging the supply chain flexibility of third party logistics - Hybrid knowledge-based system approach , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[84]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The role of information technology in the organization: a review, model, and assessment , 2001 .

[85]  James C. Hayton,et al.  Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation , 2018 .

[86]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .

[87]  Shahriar Akter,et al.  Guest editorial: information technology-enabled supply chain management , 2015 .

[88]  R. Howell.  Covariance Structure Modeling and Measurement Issues: A Note on “Interrelations among a Channel Entity's Power Sources” , 1987 .

[89]  A. Sánchez,et al.  Supply chain flexibility and firm performance , 2005 .

[90]  A. Roth,et al.  The effect of an ambidextrous supply chain strategy on combinative competitive capabilities and business performance , 2010 .

[91]  Stavros T. Ponis,et al.  Supply chain resilience: definition of concept and its formative elements , 2012 .

[92]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Coordinating for Flexibility in e-Business Supply Chains , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[93]  S. Tarba,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2013 .

[94]  Tomi Solakivi,et al.  The effect of external supply knowledge acquisition, development activities and organizational status on the supply performance of SMEs , 2017, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management.

[95]  Arun Rai,et al.  Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities , 2006 .

[96]  Jerry C. Wei,et al.  Responding to schedule changes in build‐to‐order supply chains , 2005 .

[97]  Bradley R. Staats,et al.  Perspectives on the productivity dilemma , 2009 .

[98]  Thomas V. Scannell,et al.  UPSTREAM SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND COMPETITIVE PERFORMANCE IN THE AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY INDUSTRY , 2000 .

[99]  T. V. D. Vaart,et al.  The different impact of inter-organizational and intra-organizational ICT on supply chain performance , 2016 .

[100]  R. Chavez,et al.  Data-driven supply chains, manufacturing capability and customer satisfaction , 2017 .

[101]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Making the Next Move: How Experiential and Vicarious Learning Shape the Locations of Chains' Acquisitions , 2000 .

[102]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future , 2013 .

[103]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[104]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[105]  Mike Wright,et al.  Portfolio entrepreneurship and resource orchestration , 2016 .

[106]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Ambidexterity and Survival in Corporate Venture Units , 2014 .

[107]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2006 .

[108]  Jan Löwstedt,et al.  Managing asset orchestration: A processual approach to adapting to dynamic environments , 2018, Journal of Business Research.

[109]  Maria Nieves Perez-Arostegui,et al.  The impact of ambidexterity on supply chain flexibility fit , 2016 .

[110]  Stanley E. Fawcett,et al.  Information Technology as an Enabler of Supply Chain Collaboration: A Dynamic-Capabilities Perspective , 2011 .

[111]  Constantin Blome,et al.  Antecedents and enablers of supply chain agility and its effect on performance: a dynamic capabilities perspective , 2013 .

[112]  Qing Cao,et al.  Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects , 2009, Organ. Sci..