Oxygen consumption of individual cable bacteria

Oxygen reduction in a cable bacterium is condensed in a few terminal cells, while the rest of the filament lives oxygen free. The electric wires of cable bacteria possibly support a unique respiration mode with a few oxygen-reducing cells flaring off electrons, while oxidation of the electron donor and the associated energy conservation and growth is allocated to other cells not exposed to oxygen. Cable bacteria are centimeter-long, multicellular, filamentous Desulfobulbaceae that transport electrons across oxic-anoxic interfaces in aquatic sediments. From observed distortions of the oxic-anoxic interface, we derived oxygen consumption rates of individual cable bacteria and found biomass-specific rates of unheard magnitude in biology. Tightly controlled behavior, possibly involving intercellular electrical signaling, was found to generally keep <10% of individual filaments exposed to oxygen. The results strengthen the hypothesis that cable bacteria indeed have evolved an exceptional way to take the full energetic advantages of aerobic respiration and let >90% of the cells metabolize in the convenient absence of oxidative stress.

[1]  V. Ptushenko.  Electric Cables of Living Cells. I. Energy Transfer along Coupling Membranes , 2020, Biochemistry (Moscow).

[2]  J. Vangronsveld,et al.  An Ordered and Fail‐Safe Electrical Network in Cable Bacteria , 2020, Advanced biosystems.

[3]  J. Middelburg,et al.  Division of labor and growth during electrical cooperation in multicellular cable bacteria , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Robin Bonné,et al.  A highly conductive fibre network enables centimetre-scale electron transport in multicellular cable bacteria , 2019, Nature Communications.

[5]  M. Wagner,et al.  On the evolution and physiology of cable bacteria , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  M. Kühl,et al.  Luminescence Lifetime Imaging of Chemical Sensors-A Comparison between Time-Domain and Frequency-Domain Based Camera Systems. , 2019, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  J. D’Haen,et al.  The Cell Envelope Structure of Cable Bacteria , 2018, Front. Microbiol..

[8]  F. Besenbacher,et al.  In vitro single-cell dissection revealing the interior structure of cable bacteria , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  M. Wagner,et al.  Long-distance electron transport in individual, living cable bacteria , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  A. Schramm,et al.  A taxonomic framework for cable bacteria and proposal of the candidate genera Electrothrix and Electronema , 2016, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[11]  A. Schramm,et al.  Motility of Electric Cable Bacteria , 2016, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[12]  F. Meysman,et al.  Rapid Redox Signal Transmission by “Cable Bacteria” beneath a Photosynthetic Biofilm , 2014, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  O. Wolfbeis,et al.  Optical methods for sensing and imaging oxygen: materials, spectroscopies and applications. , 2014, Chemical Society reviews.

[14]  N. Planavsky,et al.  The rise of oxygen in Earth’s early ocean and atmosphere , 2014, Nature.

[15]  B. Jørgensen,et al.  Succession of cable bacteria and electric currents in marine sediment , 2014, The ISME Journal.

[16]  F. Besenbacher,et al.  Filamentous bacteria transport electrons over centimetre distances , 2012, Nature.

[17]  L. Nielsen,et al.  Electric currents couple spatially separated biogeochemical processes in marine sediment , 2010, Nature.

[18]  M. Kühl,et al.  Combined Imaging of Bacteria and Oxygen in Biofilms , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[19]  M. Fournier,et al.  Oxygen defense in sulfate-reducing bacteria. , 2006, Journal of biotechnology.

[20]  Bai-Lian Li,et al.  Energetics of the smallest: do bacteria breathe at the same rate as whales? , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  M. Kühl,et al.  Conspicuous Veils Formed by Vibrioid Bacteria on Sulfidic Marine Sediment , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[22]  D. de Beer,et al.  Uptake Rates of Oxygen and Sulfide Measured with Individual Thiomargarita namibiensis Cells by Using Microelectrodes , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[23]  H. Cypionka,et al.  Life at the oxic-anoxic interface: microbial activities and adaptations. , 2000, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[24]  J. Branke,et al.  A feasible role of sulfate-reducing bacteria in the termite gut , 1996 .

[25]  H. Cypionka,et al.  Influence of oxygen on sulfate reduction and growth of sulfate-reducing bacteria , 1993, Archives of Microbiology.

[26]  V. Skulachev,et al.  Coupling membranes as energy-transmitting cables. II. Cyanobacterial trichomes , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[27]  L. Nielsen,et al.  Oxygen Responses and Mat Formation by Beggiatoa spp , 1985, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[28]  D. Nelson,et al.  Chemoautotrophic growth of a marine Beggiatoa in sulfide-gradient cultures , 1983, Archives of Microbiology.

[29]  L. M. Chailakhyan,et al.  Intercellular power transmission along trichomes of cyanobacteria , 1982 .

[30]  R. Rabus,et al.  A Post-Genomic View of the Ecophysiology, Catabolism and Biotechnological Relevance of Sulphate-Reducing Prokaryotes. , 2015, Advances in microbial physiology.

[31]  H. Cypionka,et al.  Oxygen respiration by desulfovibrio species. , 2000, Annual review of microbiology.