Digital logic for soft devices

Significance Soft devices offer many useful characteristics, including safe operation in close proximity to humans, the ability to adapt to their surroundings, ease of sterilization, simplicity, low cost, and light weight. Current soft devices, however, are still actuated by hard valves and electronic controls, and reliance on these components limits the use of soft devices in applications where hard structures or electronics are not compatible. This work demonstrates completely soft digital logic gates that can be integrated into soft devices and that allow computation and control within these devices, without hard valves or electronics. We demonstrate data storage, signal processing, digital-to-analog conversion, environmental sensing, and collaborative interaction between humans and soft devices. Although soft devices (grippers, actuators, and elementary robots) are rapidly becoming an integral part of the broad field of robotics, autonomy for completely soft devices has only begun to be developed. Adaptation of conventional systems of control to soft devices requires hard valves and electronic controls. This paper describes completely soft pneumatic digital logic gates having a physical scale appropriate for use with current (macroscopic) soft actuators. Each digital logic gate utilizes a single bistable valve—the pneumatic equivalent of a Schmitt trigger—which relies on the snap-through instability of a hemispherical membrane to kink internal tubes and operates with binary high/low input and output pressures. Soft, pneumatic NOT, AND, and OR digital logic gates—which generate known pneumatic outputs as a function of one, or multiple, pneumatic inputs—allow fabrication of digital logic circuits for a set–reset latch, two-bit shift register, leading-edge detector, digital-to-analog converter (DAC), and toggle switch. The DAC and toggle switch, in turn, can control and power a soft actuator (demonstrated using a pneu-net gripper). These macroscale soft digital logic gates are scalable to high volumes of airflow, do not consume power at steady state, and can be reconfigured to achieve multiple functionalities from a single design (including configurations that receive inputs from the environment and from human users). This work represents a step toward a strategy to develop autonomous control—one not involving an electronic interface or hard components—for soft devices.

[1]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  A soft, bistable valve for autonomous control of soft actuators , 2018, Science Robotics.

[2]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  A Resilient, Untethered Soft Robot , 2014 .

[3]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Pneumatic Networks for Soft Robotics that Actuate Rapidly , 2014 .

[4]  David J Beebe,et al.  Microfluidic logic gates and timers. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[5]  Derek E. Moulton,et al.  Dynamics of snapping beams and jumping poppers , 2013, 1310.3703.

[6]  Nazek El-Atab,et al.  Pressure‐Driven Two‐Input 3D Microfluidic Logic Gates , 2019, Advanced science.

[7]  Ryutaro Maeda,et al.  A pneumatically-actuated three-way microvalve fabricated with polydimethylsiloxane using the membrane transfer technique , 2000 .

[8]  Richard Vaia,et al.  Origami mechanologic , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  D. Rus,et al.  Design, fabrication and control of soft robots , 2015, Nature.

[10]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Soft robotics , 2008, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[11]  Xuanhe Zhao,et al.  Hydraulic hydrogel actuators and robots optically and sonically camouflaged in water , 2017, Nature Communications.

[12]  Cagdas D. Onal,et al.  Soft robot actuators using energy-efficient valves controlled by electropermanent magnets , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots , 2016, Nature.

[14]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  Next-generation integrated microfluidic circuits. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[15]  Naga Sai Gopi K Devaraju,et al.  Pressure driven digital logic in PDMS based microfluidic devices fabricated by multilayer soft lithography. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[16]  Daniel C Leslie,et al.  Frequency-specific flow control in microfluidic circuits with passive elastomeric features , 2009 .

[17]  Weiliang Xu,et al.  Design and Characterization of a Peristaltic Actuator Inspired by Esophageal Swallowing , 2014, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[18]  Alain Delchambre,et al.  Towards flexible medical instruments: Review of flexible fluidic actuators , 2009 .

[19]  S. Quake,et al.  Microfluidic Large-Scale Integration , 2002, Science.

[20]  W. Guggenbuhl,et al.  CMOS current schmitt trigger with fully adjustable hysteresis , 1989 .

[21]  Mark Horowitz,et al.  Static control logic for microfluidic devices using pressure-gain valves , 2010 .

[22]  Matteo Cianchetti,et al.  Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities , 2016, Science Robotics.

[23]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Soft robotics for chemists. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[24]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation , 2015, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[25]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Simple passive valves for addressable pneumatic actuation , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[26]  Philip N Duncan,et al.  Semi-autonomous liquid handling via on-chip pneumatic digital logic. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[27]  Hideo Ito,et al.  Soft Error Masking Circuit and Latch Using Schmitt Trigger Circuit , 2006, 2006 21st IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems.

[28]  G. Whitesides Soft Robotics. , 2018, Angewandte Chemie.

[29]  S. Quake,et al.  Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. , 2000, Science.

[30]  Philip N Duncan,et al.  Pneumatic oscillator circuits for timing and control of integrated microfluidics , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Stephen A. Morin,et al.  Soft Robotics: Review of Fluid‐Driven Intrinsically Soft Devices; Manufacturing, Sensing, Control, and Applications in Human‐Robot Interaction   , 2017 .

[32]  Fei Yuan Differential CMOS Schmitt trigger with tunable hysteresis , 2010 .

[33]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  Multiple independent autonomous hydraulic oscillators driven by a common gravity head , 2015, Nature Communications.

[34]  Mark A Burns,et al.  Microfluidic pneumatic logic circuits and digital pneumatic microprocessors for integrated microfluidic systems. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[35]  Stephen A. Morin,et al.  Using explosions to power a soft robot. , 2013, Angewandte Chemie.

[36]  Manu Prakash,et al.  Synchronous universal droplet logic and control , 2015, Nature Physics.

[37]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  Control of soft machines using actuators operated by a Braille display. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[38]  Markus P. Nemitz,et al.  Capability by Stacking: The Current Design Heuristic for Soft Robots , 2018, Biomimetics.

[39]  William H. Grover,et al.  Micropneumatic Digital Logic Structures for Integrated Microdevice Computation and Control , 2007, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[40]  B. Mosadegh,et al.  Integrated Elastomeric Components for Autonomous Regulation of Sequential and Oscillatory Flow Switching in Microfluidic Devices , 2010, Nature physics.

[41]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Buckling Pneumatic Linear Actuators Inspired by Muscle , 2016 .

[42]  Philip N Duncan,et al.  Scaling of pneumatic digital logic circuits. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[43]  Nicole Pamme,et al.  Continuous flow separations in microfluidic devices. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[44]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Pneumatic Energy Sources for Autonomous and Wearable Soft Robotics , 2014 .

[45]  Xi Chen,et al.  Energy efficiency of mobile soft robots. , 2017, Soft matter.

[46]  Katia Bertoldi,et al.  Discontinuous Buckling of Wide Beams and Metabeams. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[47]  Shane K. Mitchell,et al.  Hydraulically amplified self-healing electrostatic actuators with muscle-like performance , 2018, Science.

[48]  A. Haghiri-Gosnet,et al.  Logic digital fluidic in miniaturized functional devices: Perspective to the next generation of microfluidic lab‐on‐chips , 2017, Electrophoresis.

[49]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Multigait soft robot , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  William H. Grover,et al.  Development and multiplexed control of latching pneumatic valves using microfluidic logical structures. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[51]  Michael T. Tolley,et al.  Translucent soft robots driven by frameless fluid electrode dielectric elastomer actuators , 2018, Science Robotics.

[52]  Paul Horowitz,et al.  The Art of Electronics , 1980 .

[53]  Herbert B. Enderton,et al.  A mathematical introduction to logic , 1972 .

[54]  Harry Henderson Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology , 2002 .

[55]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Buckling of Elastomeric Beams Enables Actuation of Soft Machines , 2015, Advanced materials.