On computation of test dipoles for factorization method

In electrical impedance tomography, one tries to recover the spatial conductivity distribution inside a body from boundary measurements of current and voltage. In many important situations, the examined object has known background conductivity but is contaminated by inhomogeneities. The factorization method of Kirsch provides a tool for locating such inclusions. The computational attractiveness of the factorization technique relies heavily on efficient computation of Dirichlet boundary values of potentials created by dipole sources located inside the examined object and corresponding to the homogeneous Neumann boundary condition and to the known background conductivity. In certain simple situations, these test potentials can be written down explicitly or given with the help of suitable analytic maps, but, in general, they must be computed numerically. This work introduces an inexpensive algorithm for approximating the test potentials in the framework of real-life electrode measurements and analyzes how well this technique can be imbedded in the factorization method. The performance of the resulting fast reconstruction algorithm is tested in two spatial dimensions.

[1]  Nuutti Hyvönen,et al.  Factorization method and irregular inclusions in electrical impedance tomography , 2007 .

[2]  Liliana Borcea,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography , 2002 .

[3]  H. Hakula,et al.  A High-order Finite Element Method for Electical Impedance Tomography , 2006 .

[4]  Nuutti Hyvönen,et al.  Complete Electrode Model of Electrical Impedance Tomography: Approximation Properties and Characterization of Inclusions , 2004, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[5]  David Isaacson,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography , 1999, SIAM Rev..

[6]  A. Calderón,et al.  On an inverse boundary value problem , 2006 .

[7]  M. Hanke,et al.  Numerical implementation of two noniterative methods for locating inclusions by impedance tomography , 2000 .

[8]  A. Nachman,et al.  Global uniqueness for a two-dimensional inverse boundary value problem , 1996 .

[9]  Kari Astala,et al.  Calderon's inverse conductivity problem in the plane , 2006 .

[10]  D. Griffin,et al.  Finite-Element Analysis , 1975 .

[11]  Martin Hanke,et al.  Recent progress in electrical impedance tomography , 2003 .

[12]  J. Sylvester,et al.  A global uniqueness theorem for an inverse boundary value problem , 1987 .

[13]  Martin Brühl,et al.  Explicit Characterization of Inclusions in Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2001, SIAM J. Math. Anal..

[14]  D. Isaacson,et al.  Electrode models for electric current computed tomography , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Tobin A. Driscoll,et al.  Algorithm 756: a MATLAB toolbox for Schwarz-Christoffel mapping , 1996, TOMS.

[16]  Harri Hakula,et al.  Numerical implementation of the factorization method within the complete electrode model of electrical impedance tomography , 2007 .

[17]  Andreas Kirsch,et al.  Characterization of the shape of a scattering obstacle using the spectral data of the far field operator , 1998 .

[18]  Armin Lechleiter,et al.  A regularization technique for the factorization method , 2006 .

[19]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electric current computed tomography , 1992 .

[20]  Nuutti Hyvönen,et al.  Approximating idealized boundary data of electric impedance tomography by electrode measurements , 2009 .

[21]  Harri Hakula,et al.  The Factorization Method Applied to the Complete Electrode Model of Impedance Tomography , 2008, SIAM J. Appl. Math..