3D magnetic configuration of the Hα filament and X-ray sigmoid in NOAA AR 8151

We investigate the structure and relationship of an Hα filament and an X-ray sigmoid observed in active region NOAA 8151. We first examine the presence of such structures in the reconstructed 3D coronal magnetic field obtained from the non-constant-α force-free field hypothesis using a photospheric vector magnetogram (IVM, Mees Solar Observatory). This method allows us to identify several flux systems: a filament (height 30 Mm, aligned with the polarity inversion line (PIL), magnetic field strength at the apex 49 G, number of turns 0.5-0.6), a sigmoid (height 45 Mm, aligned with the PIL, magnetic field strength at the apex 56 G, number of turns 0.5-0.6) and a highly twisted flux tube (height 60 Mm, magnetic field strength at the apex 36 G, number of turns 1.1-1.2). By searching for magnetic dips in the configuration, we identify a filament structure which is in good agreement with the Hα observations. We find that both filament and sigmoidal structures can be described by a long twisted flux tube with a number of turns less than 1 which means that these structures are stable against kinking. The filament and the sigmoid have similar absolute values of α and Jz in the photosphere. However, the electric current density is positive in the filament and negative in the sigmoid: the filament is right-handed whereas the sigmoid is left-handed. This fact can explain the discrepancies between the handedness of magnetic clouds (twisted flux tubes ejected from the Sun) and the handedness of their solar progenitors (twisted flux bundles in the low corona). The mechanism of eruption in AR 8151 is more likely not related to the development of instability in the filament and/or the sigmoid but is associated with the existence of the highly twisted flux tube (∼1.1-1.2 turns).

[1]  M. Berger,et al.  The topological properties of magnetic helicity , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  P. Lamy,et al.  The Large Angle Spectroscopic Coronagraph (LASCO) , 1995 .

[3]  J. Owens,et al.  The Soft X-ray Telescope for the SOLAR-A mission , 1991 .

[4]  Eric Ronald Priest,et al.  Solar magneto-hydrodynamics , 1982 .

[5]  D. Mickey,et al.  On the Inference of Magnetic Field Vectors from Stokes Profiles , 1991 .

[6]  A. Pevtsov,et al.  Latitudinal variation of helicity of photospheric magnetic fields , 1995 .

[7]  T. Tajima,et al.  Formation of a Kinked Alignment of Solar Active Regions , 1998 .

[8]  A. Pevtsov,et al.  Properties of Magnetic Clouds and Geomagnetic Storms Associated with Eruption of Coronal Sigmoids , 2022 .

[9]  E. Priest,et al.  Critical conditions for magnetic instabilities in force-free coronal loops , 1981 .

[10]  A. Pevtsov.  Active-Region Filaments and X-ray Sigmoids , 2002 .

[11]  B. Low.  Three-dimensional structures of magnetostatic atmospheres. IV: Magnetic structures over a solar active region , 1992 .

[12]  Hugh S. Hudson,et al.  Sigmoids as precursors of solar eruptions , 2000 .

[13]  J. Luciani,et al.  Very Fast Opening of a Three-dimensional Twisted Magnetic Flux Tube , 1996 .

[14]  B. Low,et al.  A Time-dependent Three-dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic Model of the Coronal Mass Ejection , 1998 .

[15]  T. Török,et al.  The evolution of twisting coronal magnetic flux tubes , 2003 .

[16]  J. Luciani,et al.  Three-dimensional Solutions of Magnetohydrodynamic Equationsfor Prominence Magnetic Support: Twisted Magnetic Flux Rope , 1999 .

[17]  Spiro K. Antiochos,et al.  Dynamical Formation and Stability of Helical Prominence Magnetic Fields , 2000 .

[18]  J. Luciani,et al.  Confined Disruption of a Three-dimensional Twisted Magnetic Flux Tube , 1999 .

[19]  D. Wright,et al.  Crustal fissuring on the crest of the southern East Pacific Rise , 2002 .

[20]  L. Fletcher,et al.  The Structure and Evolution of a Sigmoidal Active Region , 2002 .

[21]  D. Hathaway,et al.  Elimination of projection effects from vector magnetograms: The pre-flare configuration of active region AR 4474 , 1988 .

[22]  T. Metcalf,et al.  Active-Region Magnetic Structure Observed in the Photosphere and Chromosphere , 2003 .

[23]  Alexei A. Pevtsov,et al.  What Is the Role of the Kink Instability in Solar Coronal Eruptions , 2003 .

[24]  B. Low,et al.  Modeling solar force-free magnetic fields , 1990 .

[25]  Dana Warfield Longcope,et al.  Injection of Magnetic Energy and Magnetic Helicity into the Solar Atmosphere by an Emerging Magnetic Flux Tube , 2003 .

[26]  Philip R. Goode,et al.  MAGNETIC TOPOLOGY IN 1998 NOVEMBER 5 TWO-RIBBON FLARE AS INFERRED FROM GROUND-BASED OBSERVATIONS AND LINEAR FORCE-FREE FIELD MODELING , 2000 .

[27]  D. Webb.  Erupting prominences and the geometry of coronal mass ejections , 1988 .

[28]  J. Linker,et al.  Magnetic Field Topology in Prominences , 2002 .

[29]  Z. Mikić,et al.  PROBLEMS AND PROGRESS IN COMPUTING THREE-DIMENSIONAL CORONAL ACTIVE REGION MAGNETIC FIELDS FROM BOUNDARY DATA , 1997 .

[30]  B. Low,et al.  Magnetic field configurations associated with polarity intrusion in a solar active region , 1982 .

[31]  Flux-Tube Twist Resulting from Helical Turbulence: The Σ-Effect , 1998 .

[32]  S. Antiochos,et al.  The magnetic field of solar prominences , 1994 .

[33]  E. Tandberg-Hanssen,et al.  The Nature of Solar Prominences , 1995 .

[34]  K. D. Leka,et al.  On the value of 'αAR' from vector magnetograph data , 1999 .

[35]  D. Rust,et al.  Evidence for Helically Kinked Magnetic Flux Ropes in Solar Eruptions , 1996 .

[36]  P. Lamy,et al.  The Large Angle Spectroscopic Coronagraph (LASCO) , 1995 .

[37]  H. Baty.  On the MHD stability of the vec m = 1 kink mode in solar coronal loops , 2001 .

[38]  J. Luciani,et al.  A Twisted Flux Rope Model for Coronal Mass Ejections and Two-Ribbon Flares , 2000, The Astrophysical journal.

[39]  T. Amari,et al.  3D Coronal magnetic field from vector magnetograms: non-constant-alpha force-free configuration of the active region NOAA 8151 , 2002 .

[40]  W. Neupert,et al.  EIT: Extreme-ultraviolet Imaging Telescope for the SOHO mission , 1995 .

[41]  L. Driel-Gesztelyi,et al.  Global budget for an eruptive active region - I. Equilibrium reconstruction approach , 2002 .

[42]  J. Vial,et al.  Soho Contribution to Prominence Science , 2002 .

[43]  B. Low,et al.  Three‐dimensional and twisted: An MHD interpretation of on‐disk observational characteristics of coronal mass ejections , 2000 .

[44]  R. Canfield,et al.  The morphology of flare phenomena, magnetic fields, and electric currents in active regions. I - Introduction and methods , 1993 .

[45]  R. Canfield,et al.  The imaging vector magnetograph at Haleakala , 1996 .

[46]  J. Linker,et al.  Magnetohydrodynamic modeling of prominence formation within a helmet streamer , 2001 .

[47]  Zoran Mikic,et al.  RECONSTRUCTING THE SOLAR CORONAL MAGNETIC FIELD AS A FORCE-FREE MAGNETIC FIELD , 1997 .

[48]  J. Rhoads,et al.  The practical application of the magnetic virial theorem , 1992 .

[49]  H. Hudson,et al.  Sigmoidal morphology and eruptive solar activity , 1999 .

[50]  A. Skumanich,et al.  Transfer of line radiation in a magnetic field , 1989 .