Automated Step Detection in Inertial Measurement Unit Data From Turkeys

Locomotion is an important welfare and health trait in turkey production. Current breeding values for locomotion are often based on subjective scoring. Sensor technologies could be applied to obtain objective evaluation of turkey gait. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) measure acceleration and rotational velocity, which makes them attractive devices for gait analysis. The aim of this study was to compare three different methods for step detection from IMU data from turkeys. This is an essential step for future feature extraction for the evaluation of turkey locomotion. Data from turkeys walking through a corridor with IMUs attached to each upper leg were annotated manually. We evaluated change point detection, local extrema approach, and gradient boosting machine in terms of step detection and precision of start and end point of the steps. All three methods were successful in step detection, but local extrema approach showed more false detections. In terms of precision of start and end point of steps, change point detection performed poorly due to significant irregular delay, while gradient boosting machine was most precise. For the allowed distance to the annotated steps of 0.2 s, the precision of gradient boosting machine was 0.81 and the recall was 0.84, which is much better in comparison to the other two methods (<0.61). At an allowed distance of 1 s, performance of the three models was similar. Gradient boosting machine was identified as the most accurate for signal segmentation with a final goal to extract information about turkey gait; however, it requires an annotated training dataset.

[1]  Cécile Cornou,et al.  Sow-activity classification from acceleration patterns: A machine learning approach , 2013 .

[2]  M. Pastell,et al.  A wireless accelerometer system with wavelet analysis for assessing lameness in cattle. , 2009 .

[3]  Matthew Martinez,et al.  Unsupervised Segmentation and Labeling for Smartphone Acquired Gait Data , 2016 .

[4]  Diane J. Cook,et al.  A survey of methods for time series change point detection , 2017, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[5]  J Elith,et al.  A working guide to boosted regression trees. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[6]  Genetic analysis of survival and fitness in turkeys with multiple-trait animal models. , 2011, Poultry science.

[7]  Peter Christen,et al.  A note on using the F-measure for evaluating record linkage algorithms , 2017, Statistics and Computing.

[8]  Matjaz B. Juric,et al.  Robust Stride Segmentation of Inertial Signals Based on Local Cyclicity Estimation , 2018, Sensors.

[9]  Julius Hannink,et al.  Segmentation of Gait Sequences in Sensor-Based Movement Analysis: A Comparison of Methods in Parkinson’s Disease , 2018, Sensors.

[10]  Jürgen Vangeyte,et al.  Development of a system for automatic measurements of force and visual stance variables for objective lameness detection in sows: SowSIS , 2013 .

[11]  M Pastell,et al.  Contactless measurement of cow behavior in a milking robot , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[12]  Thomas Seel,et al.  IMU-Based Joint Angle Measurement for Gait Analysis , 2014, Sensors.

[13]  Julius Hannink,et al.  Towards Mobile Gait Analysis: Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of an Inertial Measurement System for the Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters , 2017, Sensors.

[14]  M. M. Neto,et al.  Assessing locomotion deficiency in broiler chicken , 2010 .

[15]  Thilo Pfau,et al.  A method for deriving displacement data during cyclical movement using an inertial sensor , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  Berend Jan van der Zwaag,et al.  EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse Gait , 2018, Sensors.

[17]  Arno Pluk,et al.  Development of a real time cow gait tracking and analysing tool to assess lameness using a pressure sensitive walkway: the GAITWISE system , 2011 .

[18]  Claudia Bahr,et al.  Automatic monitoring of pig locomotion using image analysis , 2014 .

[19]  Yasushi Chida,et al.  Dairy cattle behavior classifications based on decision tree learning using 3-axis neck-mounted accelerometers. , 2019, Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho.

[20]  Daniel Berckmans,et al.  Comparison of a three-dimensional and two-dimensional camera system for automated measurement of back posture in dairy cows , 2014 .

[21]  Christopher R. Harris,et al.  Accurate and Reliable Gait Cycle Detection in Parkinson's Disease , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[22]  Patrick Bours,et al.  Improved Cycle Detection for Accelerometer Based Gait Authentication , 2010, 2010 Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing.

[23]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  Device-to-Device based Proximity Service: Architecture, Issues, and Applications , 2017 .

[24]  Ta Te Lin,et al.  An Imaging System Based on Deep Learning for Monitoring the Feeding Behavior of Dairy Cows , 2019, 2019 Boston, Massachusetts July 7- July 10, 2019.

[25]  D. Hand,et al.  A note on using the F-measure for evaluating data linkage algorithms , 2016 .