Spatial properties of network-mediated response of retinal ganglion cells to electric stimulation

Retinal prosthetics consistently demonstrate the ability to restore limited visual perception to those blinded from outer retinal degenerative diseases. However, the performance of retinal implants is highly inconsistent and high-density arrays have proven only marginally better than much sparser ones suggesting that improving the overall quality of elicited vision may require more than just a high density electrode array. Existing devices are also implanted subretinally and epiretinally raising the possibility that electrode location also contributes to percept quality. Here, we compared the responses to stimulation from subretinal and epiretinal electrodes in the same cell. Use of a 4×4 subretinal electrode array allowed us to also compare responses to different numbers of electrodes activated simultaneously. Surprisingly, responses showed minimal dependence of both the electrode position (epiretinal vs. subretinal) as well as on electrode size (one vs. up to nine electrodes). However, when charge density considerations are implemented, such as those that are necessary during clinical use, the responses arising from smaller electrodes were less effective. This finding may help to explain the inconsistency between theoretical visual acuity and achievement in clinical testing with the high density implanted arrays.

[1]  Y. Luo,et al.  A review and update on the current status of retinal prostheses (bionic eye). , 2014, British medical bulletin.

[2]  Alice K. Cho,et al.  Retinal prostheses: current clinical results and future needs. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[3]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  The Argus II epiretinal prosthesis system allows letter and word reading and long-term function in patients with profound vision loss , 2013, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[4]  R. H. Propst,et al.  Visual perception elicited by electrical stimulation of retina in blind humans. , 1996, Archives of ophthalmology.

[5]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Interim results from the international trial of Second Sight's visual prosthesis. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[6]  Roland Thewes,et al.  Electrical stimulation of retinal neurons in epiretinal and subretinal configuration using a multicapacitor array. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Donald K Eddington,et al.  Responses to pulsatile subretinal electric stimulation: effects of amplitude and duration. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  E. Zrenner,et al.  Electrical multisite stimulation of the isolated chicken retina , 2000, Vision Research.

[9]  Joseph F Rizzo,et al.  Encoding visual information in retinal ganglion cells with prosthetic stimulation , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[10]  Alfred Stett,et al.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  E. Chichilnisky,et al.  Electrical stimulation of mammalian retinal ganglion cells with multielectrode arrays. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Hugh J. McDermott,et al.  Factors affecting perceptual thresholds in a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  F. Werblin,et al.  A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Angelika Braun,et al.  Artificial vision with wirelessly powered subretinal electronic implant alpha-IMS , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Eyal Margalit,et al.  Inner retinal mechanisms engaged by retinal electrical stimulation. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  David Tsai,et al.  Direct activation and temporal response properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells following subretinal stimulation. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  S. Kelly,et al.  Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  S. Bloomfield,et al.  Gap Junctional Coupling Underlies the Short-Latency Spike Synchrony of Retinal α Ganglion Cells , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  S. Cogan,et al.  Retinal prostheses: current challenges and future outlook , 2007, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[20]  Joseph F Rizzo,et al.  Responses of rabbit retinal ganglion cells to electrical stimulation with an epiretinal electrode , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[21]  D. Baylor,et al.  Mosaic arrangement of ganglion cell receptive fields in rabbit retina. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.