Cochlear Coordinates in Regard to Cochlear Implantation: A Clinically Individually Applicable 3 Dimensional CT-Based Method

Setting: Cochlear implant (CI)/tertiary referral center. Subjects: Twenty-five patients implanted with an Advanced Bionics HiRes90K HiFocus1J CI. Study Design/Main Outcome Measures: A 3-dimensional cylindrical coordinate system is introduced using the basal turn of the cochlea as the x and y planes and the center of the modiolus as the z axis. The 0-degree angle is defined by the most lateral point of the horizontal semicircular canal. It is applied to both preoperative and postoperative computed tomographies in 25 patients. The angular position of the round window is examined. Interobserver reproducibility is tested by localization of all electrode contacts within the coordinate system. To observe realignment over time, electrode coordinates in postoperative images were projected on preoperative images. Additionally, comparison to existing imaging-related coordinate systems was made. Results: The angular position of the center of the round window is 34.6 ± 0.4 degrees (standard deviation) with an intraclass coefficient of 1.00. The intraclass coefficient for interobserver reproducibility of the 16 electrode contacts ranged from 0.74 to 1 for the rotational angle (&phgr;) and 0.77 to 1 for the distance to the modiolus (&rgr;). In 21 of 25 patients, a perfect match or minimal displacement of up to 3 electrode contacts was seen. Comparison to existing systems showed good correlation. Conclusion: A 3-dimensional cochlear coordinate system easily applicable in clinical patients is described, which fulfills the requirements set by an international consensus.

[1]  Patricia A. Leake,et al.  Frequency Map for the Human Cochlear Spiral Ganglion: Implications for Cochlear Implants , 2007, Journal for the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[2]  Johan H M Frijns,et al.  Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  Jean-Philippe Guyot,et al.  Measurements of electrode position inside the cochlea for different cochlear implant systems , 2005, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[4]  Johan H. M. Frijns,et al.  Consensus Panel on a Cochlear Coordinate System Applicable in Histologic, Physiologic, and Radiologic Studies of the Human Cochlea , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[5]  G M Clark,et al.  Radiologic evaluation of multichannel intracochlear implant insertion depth. , 1993, The American journal of otology.

[6]  G. M. Clark,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: The effect of electrode position on neural excitation , 1993, Hearing Research.

[7]  J. Geleijns,et al.  Evaluation of 4 Multisection CT Systems in Postoperative Imaging of a Cochlear Implant: A Human Cadaver and Phantom Study , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[8]  G M Clark,et al.  Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[9]  Margaret W Skinner,et al.  Role of Electrode Placement as a Contributor to Variability in Cochlear Implant Outcomes , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[10]  Margaret W Skinner,et al.  In Vivo Estimates of the Position of Advanced Bionics Electrode Arrays in the Human Cochlea , 2007, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[11]  G. Bredberg,et al.  Cellular pattern and nerve supply of the human organ of Corti. , 1968, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[12]  K. Hashikawa,et al.  Sign language ‘heard’ in the auditory cortex , 1999, Nature.

[13]  W. Parkinson,et al.  Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. , 1999, The American journal of otology.

[14]  Bruce J. Gantz,et al.  Residual Speech Perception and Cochlear Implant Performance in Postlingually Deafened Adults , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[15]  Y. Yonekura,et al.  Sound-induced activation of auditory cortices in cochlear implant users with post- and prelingual deafness demonstrated by positron emission tomography. , 1997, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[16]  Luca Ferrarini,et al.  Anatomic Considerations of Cochlear Morphology and Its Implications for Insertion Trauma in Cochlear Implant Surgery , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[17]  G M Clark,et al.  Improved and simplified methods for specifying positions of the electrode bands of a cochlear implant array. , 1996, The American journal of otology.

[18]  Johan H. M. Frijns,et al.  The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: A model approach , 2006, Hearing Research.