In vivo formation and repair of DNA double-strand breaks after computed tomography examinations.

Ionizing radiation can lead to a variety of deleterious effects in humans, most importantly to the induction of cancer. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most significant genetic lesions introduced by ionizing radiation that can initiate carcinogenesis. We have enumerated gamma-H2AX foci as a measure for DSBs in lymphocytes from individuals undergoing computed tomography examination of the thorax and/or the abdomen. The number of DSBs induced by computed tomography examination was found to depend linearly on the dose-length product, a radiodiagnostic unit that is proportional to both the local dose delivered and the length of the body exposed. Analysis of lymphocytes sampled up to 1 day postirradiation provided kinetics for the in vivo loss of gamma-H2AX foci that correlated with DSB repair. Interestingly, in contrast to results obtained in vitro, normal individuals repair DSBs to background levels. A patient who had previously shown severe side effects after radiotherapy displayed levels of gamma-H2AX foci at various sampling times postirradiation that were several times higher than those of normal individuals. Gamma-H2AX and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis of fibroblasts obtained from this patient confirmed a substantial DSB repair defect. Additionally, these fibroblasts showed significant in vitro radiosensitivity. These data show that the in vivo induction and repair of DSBs can be assessed in individuals exposed to low radiation doses, adding a further dimension to DSB repair studies and providing the opportunity to identify repair-compromised individuals after diagnostic irradiation procedures.

[1]  Kai Rothkamm,et al.  Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  A. Upton.  Radiation Hormesis: Data and Interpretations , 2001, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[3]  R. Marcos,et al.  No increase in micronuclei frequency in cultured blood lymphocytes from a group of filling station attendants. , 1996, Mutation research.

[4]  M. Mckay,et al.  Clinical and cellular radiosensitivity in inherited human syndromes. , 2004, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[5]  Kevin M Prise,et al.  Targeted cytoplasmic irradiation induces bystander responses. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Kai Rothkamm,et al.  A Double-Strand Break Repair Defect in ATM-Deficient Cells Contributes to Radiosensitivity , 2004, Cancer Research.

[7]  E. Gilbert.  Invited commentary: studies of workers exposed to low doses of radiation. , 2001, American journal of epidemiology.

[8]  P Lambin,et al.  Low-dose hypersensitivity: current status and possible mechanisms. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Kai Rothkamm,et al.  Pathways of DNA Double-Strand Break Repair during the Mammalian Cell Cycle , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[10]  M. Löbrich,et al.  Misrejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in primary and transformed human and rodent cells: a comparison between the HPRT region and other genomic locations. , 1999, Mutation research.

[11]  C E Land,et al.  Estimating cancer risks from low doses of ionizing radiation. , 1980, Science.

[12]  Martin Kühne,et al.  A pathway of double-strand break rejoining dependent upon ATM, Artemis, and proteins locating to gamma-H2AX foci. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[13]  岩崎 民子.  SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION : United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes , 2002 .

[14]  E. Rogakou,et al.  DNA Double-stranded Breaks Induce Histone H2AX Phosphorylation on Serine 139* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  D. Brenner,et al.  Do low dose-rate bystander effects influence domestic radon risks? , 2002, International journal of radiation biology.

[16]  J. Little,et al.  Unexpected sensitivity to the induction of mutations by very low doses of alpha-particle radiation: evidence for a bystander effect. , 1999, Radiation research.

[17]  D. Gustafson,et al.  A low, adaptive dose of gamma-rays reduced the number and altered the spectrum of S1- mutants in human-hamster hybrid AL cells. , 1996, Mutation research.

[18]  R. Doll,et al.  Risk of childhood cancer from fetal irradiation. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[19]  David J Brenner,et al.  Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. , 2004, Radiology.

[20]  David J. Chen,et al.  Role of DNA-PK in the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks. , 2004, DNA repair.

[21]  P O'Neill,et al.  Securing genome stability by orchestrating DNA repair: removal of radiation-induced clustered lesions in DNA. , 2001, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[22]  R. Doll,et al.  Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  W. Bonner.  Phenomena leading to cell survival values which deviate from linear-quadratic models. , 2004, Mutation research.

[24]  Icrp.  1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection , 1991 .

[25]  E. Rogakou,et al.  Megabase Chromatin Domains Involved in DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Vivo , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[26]  David J Brenner,et al.  Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. , 2004, Radiology.

[27]  Amy Berrington de González,et al.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries , 2004, The Lancet.