Intake, milk yield and grazing behaviour of strip-grazing Alpine dairy goats in response to daily pasture allowance.

Grazing management has an important impact on dairy ruminants' performance. References on the intake and milk yield of dairy goats under strip-grazing systems in temperate regions are scarce. In order to study the effect of pasture allowance on pasture intake (PI), milk yield and grazing behaviour, a trial was carried out in spring with 36 Alpine goats in mid-lactation. Three daily pasture allowances (PA=1.7, 2.6 and 3.5 kg dry matter (DM)/day, namely Low, Medium and High, respectively) were compared in a 3 × 3 Latin square design replicated six times during three successive 14-day periods. Goats individually received 268 g DM of concentrate twice daily at each milking and had access 11 h/day to pasture (from 0830 to 1600 h and from 1730 to 2100 h). Pasture intake increased with PA, and more so between Low and Medium than between Medium and High (+216 v. +101 g DM/kg DM of PA). Milk yield was lower on Low than on Medium and High (2.79 v. 3.13 kg/day), as were milk fat and protein yields. Grazing time averaged 476 min/day and was lowest on Low and greatest on Medium. Pasture intake rate was 30 g DM/h lower on Low and Medium than on High. It is concluded that under temperate conditions, when goats are supplemented with 536 g DM of concentrate and have enough access time to pasture (11 h/day), a medium pasture allowance close to 2.6 kg DM/day may be sufficient to maximise milk yield.

[1]  R. Delagarde,et al.  Milk production and grazing behaviour responses of Alpine dairy goats to daily access time to pasture or to daily pasture allowance on temperate pastures in spring , 2018 .

[2]  T. Gipson,et al.  Effects of pasture access regime on performance, grazing behavior, and energy utilization by Alpine goats in early and mid-lactation , 2017 .

[3]  K. Osoro,et al.  Productive responses of breeding Cashmere goats and their kids to different stocking rates on improved upland pastures. , 2016, Journal of animal science.

[4]  Remy Delagarde,et al.  Daily grazing time of dairy cows is recorded accurately using the Lifecorder Plus device , 2015 .

[5]  A. Monteiro,et al.  Ingestive behavior of goats under four grazing conditions , 2014 .

[6]  R. Delagarde,et al.  Meta-analysis of the effect of pasture allowance on pasture intake, milk production, and grazing behavior of dairy cows grazing temperate grasslands. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  T. Gipson,et al.  Effects of stocking rate and physiological state of meat goats grazing grass/forb pastures on forage intake, selection, and digestion, grazing behavior, and performance , 2013 .

[8]  R. Delagarde,et al.  Meta-analysis of the effect of pregrazing pasture mass on pasture intake, milk production, and grazing behavior of dairy cows strip-grazing temperate grasslands. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  D. Sauvant,et al.  Actualisation des recommandations alimentaires pour les chèvres laitières , 2012 .

[10]  J. Peyraud,et al.  N-alkanes v. ytterbium/faecal index as two methods for estimating herbage intake of dairy cows fed on diets differing in the herbage: maize silage ratio and feeding level. , 2012, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[11]  T. Gipson,et al.  Effects of night-locking and stage of production on forage intake, digestion, behavior, and energy utilization by meat goat does grazing grass/legume pasture , 2011 .

[12]  P. Faverdin,et al.  GRAZEIN: A MODEL OF HERBAGE INTAKE AND MILK PRODUCTION FOR GRAZING DAIRY COWS. 3. SIMULATIONS AND EXTERNAL VALIDATION OF THE MODEL , 2011 .

[13]  J. Peyraud,et al.  Ytterbium oxide has the same accuracy as chromic oxide for estimating variations of faecal dry matter output in dairy cows fed a total mixed ration at two feeding levels , 2010 .

[14]  T. Gipson,et al.  Effects of Stocking Rate, Breed and Stage of Production on Energy Expenditure and Activity of Meat Goat Does on Pasture , 2009 .

[15]  P. Morand-Fehr,et al.  Capacity of high milk yielding goats for utilizing cultivated pasture , 2008 .

[16]  A. Bonanno,et al.  Intake and milk production of goats grazing Sulla forage under different stocking rates , 2007 .

[17]  C. Krehbiel,et al.  Performance and forage selectivity of sheep and goats co-grazing grass/forb pastures at three stocking rates , 2005 .

[18]  C. Krehbiel,et al.  Grazing behavior and energy expenditure by sheep and goats co-grazing grass/forb pastures at three stocking rates , 2005 .

[19]  P. Penning,et al.  Effects of tethering management on feed intake and behaviour of Tanzanian goats , 1996 .

[20]  D. Riach,et al.  The intake and performance of cashmere goats grazing sown swards , 1994 .

[21]  R. J. Orr,et al.  Intake and behaviour responses by sheep to changes in sward characteristics under rotational grazing , 1994 .

[22]  P. V. Soest,et al.  Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[23]  R. J. Orr,et al.  Intake and behaviour responses by sheep to changes in sward characteristics under continuous stocking , 1991 .

[24]  B. Michalet-Doreau,et al.  Comparison of methods for predicting digestibility of feeds , 1988 .

[25]  J. Agabriel,et al.  Contenu ruminal de la vache charolaise. Influence d'une brusque variation du niveau alimentaire , 1988 .

[26]  P. Penning,et al.  The effect of herbage allowance on intake and performance of ewes suckling twin lambs , 1986 .

[27]  D. Beever,et al.  Ytterbium acetate as a particulate-phase digesta-flow marker , 1985, British Journal of Nutrition.

[28]  P. Bas [Enzymatic determination of nonesterified fatty acids in goat plasma]. , 1984, Annales de recherches veterinaires. Annals of veterinary research.