Fine root biomass in relation to site and stand characteristics in Norway spruce and Scots pine stands.

Variations in fine root biomass of trees and understory in 16 stands throughout Finland were examined and relationships to site and stand characteristics determined. Norway spruce fine root biomass varied between 184 and 370 g m(-2), and that of Scots pine ranged between 149 and 386 g m(-2). In northern Finland, understory roots and rhizomes (< 2 mm diameter) accounted for up to 50% of the stand total fine root biomass. Therefore, the fine root biomass of trees plus understory was larger in northern Finland in stands of both tree species, resulting in a negative relationship between fine root biomass and the temperature sum and a positive relationship between fine root biomass and the carbon:nitrogen ratio of the soil organic layer. The foliage:fine root ratio varied between 2.1 and 6.4 for Norway spruce and between 0.8 and 2.2 for Scots pine. The ratio decreased for both Norway spruce and Scots pine from south to north, as well as from fertile to more infertile site types. The foliage:fine root ratio of Norway spruce was related to basal area and stem surface area. The strong positive correlations of these three parameters with fine root nitrogen concentration implies that more fine roots are needed to maintain a certain amount of foliage when nutrient availability is low. No significant relationships were found between stand parameters and fine root biomass at the stand level, but the relationships considerably improved when both fine root biomass and stand parameters were calculated for the mean tree in the stand. When the northern and southern sites were analyzed separately, fine root biomass per tree of both species was significantly correlated with basal area and stem surface area per tree. Basal area, stem surface area and stand density can be estimated accurately and easily. Thus, our results may have value in predicting fine root biomass at the tree and stand level in boreal Norway spruce and Scots pine forests.

[1]  K. Lõhmus,et al.  Fine root biomass, production and its proportion of NPP in a fertile middle-aged Norway spruce forest: Comparison of soil core and ingrowth core methods , 2005 .

[2]  A. Bolte,et al.  Relationships between tree dimension and coarse root biomass in mixed stands of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies[L.] Karst.) , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[3]  H. Majdi,et al.  Effects of ammonium sulphate application on the chemistry of bulk soil, rhizosphere, fine roots and fine-root distribution in a Picea abies (L.) karst. stand , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[4]  Nutrient cycling in Pinus sylvestris stands in eastern Finland , 1995 .

[5]  E. George,et al.  Effect of stand age on fine-root biomass and biomass distribution in three European forest chronosequences , 2005 .

[6]  H. Helmisaari,et al.  Fine-root biomass and necromass in limed and fertilized Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stands , 1999 .

[7]  Petteri Vanninen,et al.  Fine root biomass of Scots pine stands differing in age and soil fertility in southern Finland. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[8]  S. Kellomäki,et al.  Below- and above-ground biomass, production and nitrogen use in Scots pine stands in eastern Finland , 2002 .

[9]  H. H. Bartelink,et al.  A model of dry matter partitioning in trees. , 1998, Tree physiology.

[10]  G. Ståhl,et al.  Functions for below-ground biomass of Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies, Betula pendula and Betula pubescens in Sweden , 2006 .

[11]  C. Ammer,et al.  An approach for modelling the mean fine-root biomass of Norway spruce stands , 2005, Trees.

[12]  T. Christensen,et al.  Carbon cycling in subarctic tundra; seasonal variation in ecosystem partitioning based on in situ 14C pulse-labelling , 2004 .

[13]  H. Helmisaari,et al.  Fine root biomass and production in Scots pine stands in relation to stand age. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[14]  W. Kurz,et al.  Belowground biomass dynamics in the Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector: recent improvements and implications for the estimation of NPP and NEP , 2003 .

[15]  S. Gower,et al.  CARBON DYNAMICS OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN DOUGLAS-FIR: INFLUENCE OF WATER AND NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY' , 1992 .

[16]  R. K. Hermann,et al.  Root biomass studies in forest ecosystems , 1977, Pedobiologia.

[17]  Werner A. Kurz,et al.  Estimation of root biomass and dynamics for the carbon budget model of the Canadian forest sector , 1996 .

[18]  K. Vogt,et al.  Conifer and Angiosperm Fine-Root Biomass in Relation to Stand Age and Site Productivity in Douglas-Fir Forests , 1987 .

[19]  J. Cihlar,et al.  Estimating fine-root biomass and production of boreal and cool temperate forests using aboveground measurements: A new approach , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[20]  Jouko Laasasenaho.  Taper curve and volume functions for pine, spruce and birch [Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies, Betula pendula, Betula pubescens] , 1982 .

[21]  H. Helmisaari,et al.  Nutrient retranslocation within the foliage of Pinus sylvestris. , 1992, Tree physiology.

[22]  H. Helmisaari,et al.  Nutrient retranslocation in three Pinus sylvestris stands , 1992 .

[23]  J. Derome,et al.  Effects of Nitrogen Inputs on Forest Ecosystems Estimation Based on Long-Term Fertilization Experiments , 1990 .

[24]  Growth and shoot: Root ratio of seedlings in relation to nutrient availability , 1995 .

[25]  C. C. Grier,et al.  Above- and below-ground net production in 40-year-old Douglas-fir stands on low and high productivity sites , 1981 .

[26]  K. Vogt,et al.  Organic Matter and Nutrient Dynamics in Forest Floors of Young and Mature Abies amabilis Stands in Western Washington, as Affected by Fine‐Root Input , 1983 .

[27]  H. Majdi,et al.  Fine Root Production and Turnover in a Norway Spruce Stand in Northern Sweden: Effects of Nitrogen and Water Manipulation , 2005, Ecosystems.

[28]  Susan E. Trumbore,et al.  The Secret Lives of Roots , 2003, Science.

[29]  M. Salkinoja-Salonen,et al.  Decomposition of cellulose strips in relation to climate, litterfall nitrogen, phosphorus and C/N ratio in natural boreal forests , 2000, Plant and Soil.

[30]  Raisa Mäkipää,et al.  Relationship between biomass and percentage cover in understorey vegetation of boreal coniferous forests , 2006 .

[31]  H. Asbjornsen,et al.  Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species , 1995, Plant and Soil.

[32]  F. S. Chapin,et al.  The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants , 1980 .

[33]  H. Helmisaari,et al.  Seasonal and yearly variations of fine-root biomass and necromass in a Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stand , 1998 .

[34]  K. Vogt,et al.  Estimating Douglas-fir fine root biomass and production from living bark and starch , 1985 .

[35]  A. Olsthoorn.  Fine root density and root biomass of two Douglas-fir stands on sandy soils in The Netherlands. 1. Root biomass in early summer. , 1991 .

[36]  D. V. Lear,et al.  A technique for estimating below-stump biomass of mature loblolly pine plantations , 1995 .

[37]  H. Majdi,et al.  Root distribution in a Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stand subjected to drought and ammonium-sulphate application , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[38]  H. Persson,et al.  The distribution and productivity of fine roots in boreal forests , 1983 .

[39]  Eileen H. Helmer,et al.  Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests , 1997, Oecologia.

[40]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  The carbon cost of fine root turnover in a Scots pine forest , 2002 .

[41]  S. Gower,et al.  Belowground carbon allocation in unfertilized and fertilized red pine plantations in northern Wisconsin. , 1995, Tree physiology.

[42]  F. Chapin.  Nitrogen and phosphorus nutrition and nutrient cycling by evergreen and deciduous understory shrubs in an Alaskan black spruce forest , 1983 .

[43]  A. Cajander,et al.  Forest types and their significance. , 1949 .