Functional Impact Comparison of Common and Innovative Products

Innovation has been touted as a means toward providing sustainability. Innovations in materials, manufacturing, and product design can lead to a reduction of global environmental impacts while helping to realize the goals of a sustainable society. This research aims to explore whether or not product functionality has an effect on environmental impact and if the flow of energy, materials, and signals (EMS) have an effect on product environmental impact. Innovative and common products are identified and life cycle assessment is performed for each product at the component level. Using function impact matrices, the environmental impacts of the product components are propagated back to the functional level, where their impacts are compared. The innovative products of the comparisons conducted appear to be more environmentally impact; more work must be done to understand whether the result is generalizable. The intended use of this research is during the conceptual design phase when little is known about the final form of a product. With approximate impacts of functions known, designers can better utilize their design efforts to reduce overall product environmental impact.Copyright © 2013 by ASME

[1]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Functional Interdependence and Product Similarity Based on Customer Needs , 1999 .

[2]  Jahau Lewis Chen,et al.  An Eco-Innovative Tool by Integrating FMEA and TRIZ Methods , 2005, 2005 4th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing.

[3]  Yasushi Umeda,et al.  A Design Support System for Scenario-Based Lifecycle Design , 2011 .

[4]  Srikanth Devanathan,et al.  Integration of Sustainability Into Early Design Through Working Knowledge Model and Visual Tools , 2009 .

[5]  Jahau Lewis Chen,et al.  An Eco-innovative design method based on design-around approach , 2003, 2003 EcoDesign 3rd International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing.

[6]  Wolfgang Grimm,et al.  Reuse of Electric Motors in Consumer Products , 1998 .

[7]  Daniel Collado-Ruiz,et al.  Comparing LCA results out of competing products: developing reference ranges from a product family approach , 2010 .

[8]  Srikanth Devanathan,et al.  Function Impact Matrix for Sustainable Concept Generation: A Designer’s Perspective , 2010 .

[9]  Eberhard Abele,et al.  Environmentally-friendly product development : methods and tools , 2005 .

[10]  D. Maxwell,et al.  Developing sustainable products and services , 2003 .

[11]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Development of a Functional Basis for Design , 2000 .

[12]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  Assessing Creativity and Innovation at the Concept Generation Stage in Engineering Design: A Classroom Experiment , 2010 .

[13]  Wolter J. Fabrycky,et al.  Systems engineering and analysis , 1981 .

[14]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Innovative and Common Products , 2012 .

[15]  Srikanth Devanathan,et al.  Integration of Sustainability Into Early Design Through the Function Impact Matrix , 2010 .

[16]  Tomohiko Sakao,et al.  A QFD-centred design methodology for environmentally conscious product design , 2007 .

[17]  S. Joshi.  Product Environmental Life‐Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Techniques , 1999 .

[18]  Karl R. Haapala,et al.  Sustainable Manufacturing Analysis for Titanium Components , 2011 .

[19]  David G. Ullman,et al.  The Mechanical Design Process , 1992 .

[20]  Karl R. Haapala,et al.  AN ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF NANOPARTICLE-ASSISTED DIFFUSION BRAZING , 2009 .

[21]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Introduction of a Data Schema: The Inner Workings of a Design Repository , 2006 .

[22]  Simon Szykman,et al.  Enhancing Virtual Product Representations for Advanced Design Repository Systems , 2005, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[23]  Chao Deng,et al.  Integration and optimization of LCA and LCC to eco-balance for mechanical product design , 2008, 2008 7th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation.

[24]  E Jones,et al.  Investigating the use of TRIZ in eco-innovation , 2000 .

[25]  Chih-Chen Liu,et al.  An eco-innovative design approach incorporating the TRIZ method without contradiction analysis , 2001 .

[26]  E. Manzini.  Strategic design for sustainability: towards a new mix of products and services , 1999, Proceedings First International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing.

[27]  Joseph R. Fiksel.  Design for environment : a guide to sustainable product development , 2009 .

[28]  A. Korpela,et al.  A comparative life-cycle assessment between NbTi and copper magnets , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[29]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  Integrating Life Cycle Assessment Into the Conceptual Phase of Design Using a Design Repository , 2010 .

[30]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  Measuring eco-innovation , 2009 .