A methodology for facilitating the feedback between mental models and institutional change in industrial ecosystem governance: A waste management case-study from northern Finland

Deliberative environmental policy links the formal institutional setting within which environmental policy takes place and the informal ways of thinking and doing by those whose daily work the policy influences. Despite an extensive theoretically oriented literature on policy deliberation, little methodological advice exists relating deliberation to the two domains it aims to link, i.e., the formal and informal institutions. In this paper, we develop a methodology for environmental policy deliberation that is grounded in institutional theory and theories explaining the cognitive practices of individuals in action situations. The methodology has three stages. First, we outline the problem setting on the basis of the stakeholders' mental model analysis. Second, more specific research problems and proposed solutions are formulated collaboratively with researchers from different fields. Third, the hypotheses are tested and challenged in a workshop with the interviewed stakeholders and re-formulated into final institutional recommendations. We illustrate the success of the procedure with a case study on a regional industrial complex located in the Bothnian Arc of northern Finland.

[1]  Y. Engeström Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. , 2001 .

[2]  John Forester,et al.  The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes , 1999 .

[3]  J. Wertsch The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology , 1981 .

[4]  Robert V. Bartlett,et al.  Deliberative Environmental Politics: Democracy and Ecological Rationality , 2005 .

[5]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The Struggle to Govern the Commons , 2003, Science.

[6]  Maarten A. Hajer,et al.  Deliberative Policy Analysis: Contents , 2003 .

[7]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[8]  S. Chambers,et al.  DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRATIC THEORY , 2003 .

[9]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory and individual and social transformation. , 1999 .

[10]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research , 2014 .

[11]  F. Fischer Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge , 2000 .

[12]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  Reason and the rationalization of society , 1984 .

[13]  John S. Dryzek,et al.  Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science , 1992 .

[14]  T E Graedel,et al.  Industrial ecology: concepts and approaches. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  D. North,et al.  Elements of Reason: Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions , 1994 .

[16]  E. Ostrom Understanding Institutional Diversity , 2005 .

[17]  Douglass C. North,et al.  Understanding the Process of Economic Change , 1999 .

[18]  N. E. Gallopoulos,et al.  Strategies for Manufacturing , 1989 .

[19]  Elizabeth R. DeSombre,et al.  The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale , 2002 .

[20]  Heinz-Peter Wallner,et al.  Towards sustainable development of industry: networking, complexity and eco-clusters , 1999 .

[21]  D. North Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[22]  Nani Pajunen,et al.  Governing the Interplay between Industrial Ecosystems and Environmental Regulation , 2012 .

[23]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Conceptual Integration Networks , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  Dennis F. Thompson,et al.  Why deliberative democracy , 2004 .

[25]  Liliana B. Andonova Public-Private Partnerships for the Earth: Politics and Patterns of Hybrid Authority in the Multilateral System , 2010, Global Environmental Politics.

[26]  J. Dryzek Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance , 2011 .

[27]  T. Graedel,et al.  Industrial ecology: goals and definitions , 2002 .

[28]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[29]  J. Hukkinen Model of the social–ecological system depends on model of the mind: Contrasting information-processing and embodied views of cognition , 2014 .

[30]  J. Bohman Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy , 1996 .

[31]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Activity Theory and Learning at Work , 2014 .

[32]  J. Habermas Theory of Communicative Action , 1981 .

[33]  Jerome A. Feldman,et al.  From Molecule to Metaphor - A Neural Theory of Language , 2006 .

[34]  Hilde N. Opoku,et al.  Policy implications of industrial ecology conceptions , 2004 .

[35]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  On Industrial ecosystems , 2002 .