Pimozide attenuates free feeding: Best scores analysis reveals a motivational deficit

Pimozide treatment (1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg) decreased free feeding in rats. The animals were presented daily with 35 meal segments, each consisting of five 45-mg pellets; pimozide resulted in longer mean latencies to initiate eating, longer mean eating times per segment (duration scores) and more pellets left uneaten. The increase in durations was progressive both within and across test sessions; toward the end of the final session many pellets were left uneaten. Failure to initiate eating of the first pellet of each segment was rare, and was always preceded by failure to eat the fifth pellet of the preceding meal segment. To assess whether either the increase in latencies or the increase in durations reflected an impairment of absolute response capability, ‘best scores’ in the pimozide and control conditions were compared; the shortest latencies and durations in the pimozide condition were as ‘good’ as those of the control condition. However, the animals generally produced ‘best’ scores on fewer trials in the pimozide condition. An exception was on day 1 of testing, when the frequency of ‘best’ latencies was higher in the pimozide condition. The fact that the ‘best’ scores under pimozide equalled the ‘best’ scores under vehicle suggests that the pimozide-treated animals had the motoric capacity to respond normally. The facts that the pimozide-treated animals did not perform to the demonstrated limits of that capacity in a normal percentage of trials and that performance on days 2 and 3 of testing were ‘worse’ than performance on day 1 of testing suggest that pimozide causes a motivational deficit that has not been widely recognized.

[1]  A. Amsel,et al.  Motivational properties of frustration. I. Effect on a running response of the addition of frustration to the motivational complex. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  T. Tombaugh,et al.  Controlled Operant Conditioning Boxes with Discrete-Trial Programming for Multiple Experimental Use , 1965, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  C. Niemegeers,et al.  Pimozide, a chemically novel, highly potent and orally long-acting neuroleptic drug. I. The comparative pharmacology of pimozide, haloperidol, and chlorpromazine. , 1968, Arzneimittel-Forschung.

[4]  U. Ungerstedt Adipsia and aphagia after 6-hydroxydopamine induced degeneration of the nigro-striatal dopamine system. , 1971, Acta physiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[5]  A. Phillips,et al.  Haloperidol-induced disruption of conditioned avoidance responding: attenuation by prior training or by anticholinergic drugs. , 1975, European journal of pharmacology.

[6]  R. Wise,et al.  Increased lever pressing for amphetamine after pimozide in rats: implications for a dopamine theory of reward. , 1975, Science.

[7]  O. Hornykiewicz Parkinsonism induced by dopaminergic antagonists. , 1975, Advances in neurology.

[8]  R. Wise,et al.  Pimozide-induced extinction of intracranial self-stimulation: response patterns rule out motor or performance deficits , 1976, Brain Research.

[9]  R. Wise,et al.  Blockade of cocaine reinforcement in rats with the dopamine receptor blocker pimozide, but not with the noradrenergic blockers phentolamine or phenoxybenzamine. , 1977, Canadian journal of psychology.

[10]  M. Zigmond,et al.  Effects of dopaminergic agonists and antagonists of feeding in intact and 6-hydroxydopamine-treated rats. , 1977, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[11]  R. Wise,et al.  Neuroleptic-induced attenuation of brain stimulation reward in rats. , 1978, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[12]  K. Franklin Catecholamines and self-stimulation: Reward and performance effects dissociated , 1978, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[13]  R. Wise,et al.  Neuroleptic-induced "anhedonia" in rats: pimozide blocks reward quality of food. , 1978, Science.

[14]  R. Wise,et al.  Major attenuation of food reward with performance-sparing doses of pimozide in the rat. , 1978, Canadian journal of psychology.

[15]  S. Ahlénius An analysis of behavioural effects produced by drug-induced changes of dopaminergic neurotransmission in the brain. , 1979, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[16]  K. Franklin,et al.  Pimozide-induced extinction in rats: Stimulus control of responding rules out motor deficit , 1979, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[17]  S. T. Mason,et al.  Pimozide-induced suppression of responding: Evidence against a block of food reward , 1980, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[18]  P. Rogers,et al.  Behavioural analysis of feeding: implications for the pharmacological manipulation of food intake in animals and man. , 1980, Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology.

[19]  J. Marshall,et al.  Neostriatal dopamine and sensory inattention. , 1980, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[20]  R. Wise,et al.  Pimozide attenuates lever pressing for water reinforcement in rats , 1981, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[21]  G. Koob The dopamine anhedonia hypothesis: A pharmacological phrenology , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[22]  R. Wise Neuroleptics and operant behavior: The anhedonia hypothesis , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  G. Campanella,et al.  Drugs affecting movement disorders. , 1987, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[24]  E. T. Rolls,et al.  The relative attenuation of self-stimulation, eating and drinking produced by dopamine-receptor blockade , 2004, Psychopharmacologia.

[25]  H. Anisman,et al.  Effects of dopamine receptor blockade on alimentary behaviors: Home cage food consumption, magazine training, operant acquisition, and performance , 1979, Psychopharmacology.

[26]  H. Fibiger,et al.  Neuroleptic-induced deficits in food and water regulation: Similarities to the lateral hypothalamic syndrome , 1975, Psychopharmacologia.

[27]  H. Anisman,et al.  Extinction and dopamine receptor blockade after intermittent reinforcement training: Failure to observe functional equivalence , 1980, Psychopharmacology.

[28]  R. Wise,et al.  Attenuation of intravenous amphetamine reinforcement by central dopamine blockade in rats , 1976, Psychopharmacology.

[29]  A. Phillips,et al.  Decreased intracranial self-stimulation after neuroleptics or 6-hydroxydopamine: Evidence for mediation by motor deficits rather than by reduced reward , 1976, Psychopharmacology.

[30]  Donald Posluns,et al.  An analysis of chlorpromazine-induced suppression of the avoidance response , 1962, Psychopharmacologia.

[31]  A. Phillips,et al.  Attenuation by haloperidol of place preference conditioning using food reinforcement , 2004, Psychopharmacology.