Improved Particle Swarm Optimization-Based Form-Finding Method for Suspension Bridge Installation Analysis

In this paper, an improved particle swarm optimization (IPSO) method, which is based on standard particle swarm optimization (PSO) and a changing range genetic algorithm (GA), is proposed, and it is applied in the form-finding analysis of a suspension bridge installation. The new method has been integrated into the successive iteration method of the form-finding analysis, and it transfers the usual iterative process of form-finding analysis into a single objective optimization problem. The computation formulation and computer code of the IPSO have been developed and implemented, and benchmark examples are studied to test the performance of the IPSO method through numerical experiments. The results show that IPSO can be used as a viable solution methodology for the form-finding analysis in various initial, boundary, and complicated load conditions to overcome the limitations of the conventional Newton-Raphson (N-R) iterative method. Furthermore, compared with GA, PSO, and GA-PSO, IPSO has greater accuracy and efficiency. Finally, the method is applied in an actual form-finding analysis of a multitower suspension bridge (Yingwuzhou Yangtze River Bridge) to validate the practicality and feasibility of the IPSO-based method in engineering design. The case study indicates that IPSO provides superior convergent solutions for the analysis considered here when compared to the N-R method, and the computation time is affordable for large-scale engineering bridge construction design and analysis.

[1]  W. Volk,et al.  Applied Statistics for Engineers (2nd ed.). , 1982 .

[2]  A. Der Kiureghian,et al.  Tangent Geometric Stiffness of Inclined Cables Under Self-Weight , 2005 .

[3]  Pascal Bouvry,et al.  Particle swarm optimization: Hybridization perspectives and experimental illustrations , 2011, Appl. Math. Comput..

[4]  Wei‐Xin Ren,et al.  A parabolic cable element for static analysis of cable structures , 2008 .

[5]  B. Zhao,et al.  An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm for optimal reactive power dispatch , 2005, IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2005.

[6]  Chuangxin Guo,et al.  An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm for unit commitment , 2006 .

[7]  Ho-Kyung Kim,et al.  Determination of hanger installation procedure for a self-anchored suspension bridge , 2006 .

[8]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Analysis of clustered tensegrity structures using a modified dynamic relaxation algorithm , 2011 .

[9]  M. Pagitz,et al.  Finite element based form-finding algorithm for tensegrity structures , 2009 .

[10]  A. Ghanbarzadeh,et al.  Application of PSO (particle swarm optimization) and GA (genetic algorithm) techniques on demand est , 2010 .

[11]  Jaehong Lee,et al.  Advanced form-finding of tensegrity structures , 2010 .

[12]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[13]  Raid Karoumi,et al.  Some modeling aspects in the nonlinear finite element analysis of cable supported bridges , 1999 .

[14]  A. Amirjanov The dynamics of a changing range genetic algorithm , 2010 .

[15]  Ho-Kyung Kim,et al.  Non-linear shape-finding analysis of a self-anchored suspension bridge , 2002 .

[16]  Amit Konar,et al.  Particle Swarm Optimization and Differential Evolution Algorithms: Technical Analysis, Applications and Hybridization Perspectives , 2008, Advances of Computational Intelligence in Industrial Systems.

[17]  Di Hu,et al.  An improved particle swarm optimizer for parametric optimization of flexible satellite controller , 2011, Appl. Math. Comput..

[18]  Ki-Seok Kim,et al.  Analysis of target configurations under dead loads for cable-supported bridges , 2001 .

[19]  O. Weck,et al.  A COMPARISON OF PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION AND THE GENETIC ALGORITHM , 2005 .

[20]  Wentao Li,et al.  AN IMPROVED PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHM FOR PATTERN SYNTHESIS OF PHASED ARRAYS , 2008 .

[21]  A. Amirjanov The development of a changing range genetic algorithm , 2006 .

[22]  Seung-Eock Kim,et al.  Nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of cable structures , 2011 .

[23]  Yongshou Dai,et al.  An improved PSO algorithm and its application in seismic wavelet extraction , 2011 .

[24]  Erwie Zahara,et al.  A hybrid genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for multimodal functions , 2008, Appl. Soft Comput..

[25]  M. Sudhakaran,et al.  GA and PSO culled hybrid technique for economic dispatch problem with prohibited operating zones , 2007 .

[26]  Ainars Paeglitis,et al.  Finite Element Modelling For Static Behaviour Analysis of Suspension Bridges with Varying Rigidity of Main Cables , 2008 .

[27]  Terence O'Brien,et al.  General Solution of Suspended Cable Problems , 1967 .

[28]  Seung-Eock Kim,et al.  Nonlinear inelastic dynamic analysis of suspension bridges , 2010 .

[29]  Adil Amirjanov,et al.  A changing range genetic algorithm , 2004 .

[30]  Christos T. Georgakis,et al.  Cable supported bridges concept and design , 2011 .

[31]  Adnan Acan,et al.  The Latest vs. Averaged Recent Experience: Which Better Guides a PSO Algorithm? , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation.