Electrode impedance analysis of chronic tungsten microwire neural implants: understanding abiotic vs. biotic contributions

Changes in biotic and abiotic factors can be reflected in the complex impedance spectrum of the microelectrodes chronically implanted into the neural tissue. The recording surface of the tungsten electrode in vivo undergoes abiotic changes due to recording site corrosion and insulation delamination as well as biotic changes due to tissue encapsulation as a result of the foreign body immune response. We reported earlier that large changes in electrode impedance measured at 1 kHz were correlated with poor electrode functional performance, quantified through electrophysiological recordings during the chronic lifetime of the electrode. There is a need to identity the factors that contribute to the chronic impedance variation. In this work, we use numerical simulation and regression to equivalent circuit models to evaluate both the abiotic and biotic contributions to the impedance response over chronic implant duration. COMSOL® simulation of abiotic electrode morphology changes provide a possible explanation for the decrease in the electrode impedance at long implant duration while biotic changes play an important role in the large increase in impedance observed initially.

[1]  Edgard Morya,et al.  Comprehensive Analysis of Tissue Preservation and Recording Quality from Chronic Multielectrode Implants , 2011, PloS one.

[2]  D. Kipke,et al.  Repeated voltage biasing improves unit recordings by reducing resistive tissue impedances , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  David C. Martin,et al.  Neuronal cell loss accompanies the brain tissue response to chronically implanted silicon microelectrode arrays , 2005, Experimental Neurology.

[4]  D. Kipke,et al.  Long-term neural recording characteristics of wire microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex. , 1999, Brain research. Brain research protocols.

[5]  Mark E. Orazem,et al.  Enhanced Graphical Representation of Electrochemical Impedance Data , 2006 .

[6]  Daryl R Kipke,et al.  Complex impedance spectroscopy for monitoring tissue responses to inserted neural implants , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[7]  D. Szarowski,et al.  Cerebral Astrocyte Response to Micromachined Silicon Implants , 1999, Experimental Neurology.

[8]  Justin C. Williams,et al.  Stability of chronic multichannel neural recordings: Implications for a long-term neural interface , 1999, Neurocomputing.

[9]  Patrick A Tresco,et al.  Chronic response of adult rat brain tissue to implants anchored to the skull. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[10]  Patrick D Wolf,et al.  A fully implantable 96-channel neural data acquisition system , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[11]  M. Sluyters-Rehbach,et al.  The analysis of electrode impedances complicated by the presence of a constant phase element , 1984 .

[12]  A. Levey,et al.  Implanted neural electrodes cause chronic, local inflammation that is correlated with local neurodegeneration , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[13]  M. Ward,et al.  Toward a comparison of microelectrodes for acute and chronic recordings , 2009, Brain Research.

[14]  E. McAdams,et al.  The linear and non-linear electrical properties of the electrode-electrolyte interface , 1995 .

[15]  D. Szarowski,et al.  Brain responses to micro-machined silicon devices , 2003, Brain Research.

[16]  Patrick A Tresco,et al.  The brain tissue response to implanted silicon microelectrode arrays is increased when the device is tethered to the skull. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[17]  Daryl R. Kipke,et al.  Voltage pulses change neural interface properties and improve unit recordings with chronically implanted microelectrodes , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Justin C. Sanchez,et al.  Quantifying long-term microelectrode array functionality using chronic in vivo impedance testing , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[19]  P. Carney,et al.  Structural modifications in chronic microwire electrodes for cortical neuroprosthetics: a case study , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  David R. Wozny,et al.  The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  R. Rennaker,et al.  An economical multi-channel cortical electrode array for extended periods of recording during behavior , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[22]  Daryl R Kipke,et al.  Theoretical analysis of intracortical microelectrode recordings , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[23]  R. A. Serway Principles of Physics , 1994 .

[24]  Z. Cohn,et al.  The macrophage. , 1973, International review of cytology.

[25]  Aubrey T. Dyer,et al.  Electrode Failure: Tissue, Electrical, and Material Responses , 2012, IEEE Pulse.

[26]  Justin C. Sanchez,et al.  Comprehensive characterization and failure modes of tungsten microwire arrays in chronic neural implants , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[27]  Justin C. Sanchez,et al.  Corrosion of tungsten microelectrodes used in neural recording applications , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[28]  W. Grill,et al.  Electrical properties of implant encapsulation tissue , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  P. Tresco,et al.  Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.