Methodology Fit in Offshoring Software Development Projects

Offshoring has become a viable alternative for companies to lower software development costs and leverage labor resources worldwide. To achieve success in offshoring software development projects, a vendor must choose appropriate development methodologies. This study aims to examine how methodology fit affects offshoring project performance. The authors propose that methodology fit affects project performance through interfirm knowledge sharing between vendors and clients. In addition, the impact of methodology fit on knowledge sharing is dependent on relational capital between vendors and clients. A survey was conducted among software companies in China that provide offshoring services. 108 completed questionnaires were collected. The results confirm the authors' hypotheses.

[1]  Jens Dibbern,et al.  Explaining Variations in Client Extra Costs Between Software Projects Offshored to India , 2008, MIS Q..

[2]  C. Handy Trust and the virtual organization , 1999 .

[3]  S. Balaji,et al.  Critical Capabilities for Offshore Outsourcing of Information Systems , 2007, MIS Q. Executive.

[4]  Matt E. Thatcher,et al.  A Learning Model of Information Technology Outsourcing: Normative Implications , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Contingency Approach to Software Project Coordination , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Sarma R. Nidumolu A Comparison of the Structural Contingency and Risk-Based Perspectives on Coordination in Software Development Projects , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Erich J. Neuhold,et al.  Offshoring and Transfer of Intellectual Property , 2010, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[8]  A. Tiwana Does interfirm modularity complement ignorance? A field study of software outsourcing alliances , 2008 .

[9]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[10]  William R. King,et al.  Antecedents of Knowledge Transfer from Consultants to Clients in Enterprise System Implementations , 2005, MIS Q..

[11]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Business-Related Determinants of Offshoring Intensity , 2008, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[12]  Narayan Ramasubbu,et al.  Work Dispersion, Process-Based Learning, and Offshore Software Development Performance , 2008, MIS Q..

[13]  Peng Xu,et al.  Can distributed software development be agile? , 2006, CACM.

[14]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Expertise Integration and Creativity in Information Systems Development , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  W. R. King,et al.  Information systems offshoring: research status and issues , 2008 .

[16]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Agile Practices Reduce Distance in Global Software Development , 2006, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[17]  Nathan Denny,et al.  Hybrid Offshoring: Composite Personae and Evolving Collaboration Technologies , 2008, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[18]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Audris Mockus,et al.  An Empirical Study of Speed and Communication in Globally Distributed Software Development , 2003, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[20]  Robert L. Glass,et al.  Strong vs. weak approaches to systems development , 1998, CACM.

[21]  James C. Beaty,et al.  Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: a 30-year review. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  IT Outsourcing Success: A Psychological Contract Perspective , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  José L. Gascó,et al.  Information systems outsourcing risks: a study of large firms , 2005, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[24]  Soni Agrawal,et al.  Factors Influencing Performance of ITES Firms in India , 2012, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[25]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital , 2000 .

[26]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Quality Management in Systems Development: An Organizational System Perspective , 2000, MIS Q..

[28]  Peng Xu,et al.  Software Process Tailoring: An Empirical Investigation , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Kyung Kyu Kim,et al.  Structure and Perceived Effectiveness of Software Development Subunits: A Task Contingency Analysis , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Jae-Nam Lee,et al.  The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[31]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  A Comparison of Transaction Cost, Agency, and Knowledge-Based Predictors of IT Outsourcing Decisions: A U.S.-Japan Cross-Cultural Field Study , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Dinesh Batra,et al.  Modified agile practices for outsourced software projects , 2009, CACM.

[33]  Iulia Jianu,et al.  Influence Factors for the Choice of a Software Development Methodology , 2011 .

[34]  Michael Goul,et al.  Service-Oriented Methodology for Systems Development , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Björn Regnell,et al.  Are you biting off more than you can chew? A case study on causes and effects of overscoping in large-scale software engineering , 2012, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[36]  Benjamin B. M. Shao,et al.  The relationship between user participation and system success: a simultaneous contingency approach , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[37]  Gabriel Szulanski The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness , 2000 .

[38]  Bill Curtis,et al.  A field study of the software design process for large systems , 1988, CACM.

[39]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  How Endogenous Motivations Influence User Intentions: Beyond the Dichotomy of Extrinsic and Intrinsic User Motivations , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[40]  A. S. M. Sajeev,et al.  Offshore outsourcing: the risk of keeping mum , 2007, CACM.

[41]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Functionality Risk in Information Systems Development: An Empirical Investigation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[42]  Rajesh Mirani,et al.  Client-Vendor Relationships in Offshore Applications Development: An Evolutionary Framework , 2006, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[43]  Andaç T. Arıkan,et al.  Interfirm Knowledge Exchanges and the Knowledge Creation Capability of Clusters , 2009 .

[44]  W. Doll,et al.  Knowledge sharing and strategic fit in integrated product development proejcts: An empirical study , 2011 .

[45]  Jae-Nam Lee,et al.  IT Outsourcing Strategies: Universalistic, Contingency, and Configurational Explanations of Success , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[46]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  From the Vendor's Perspective: Exploring the Value Proposition in Information Technology Outsourcing 1, 2 , 2003 .

[47]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[48]  Ron Jeffries,et al.  Extreme Programming and Agile Software Development Methodologies , 2004, Inf. Syst. Manag..