The Mediating Role of Intellectual Capital in Open Innovation in the Service Industries

The paper intends to examine the mediating role of intellectual capital in the relation between the openness of service companies’ search strategies and thr innovation performance. It models the relationship between external search strategies of open innovation and proposes how intellectual capital matters for openness strategies in the service industries. Moreover, the paper intends to expand the field of open innovation through exploring the mediating effect of intellectual capital. This paper fulfills an identified need to study how intellectual capital can be enabled in the open innovation of the service industries. Both Hierarchical Multiple Regression and the Structural Equation Model were employed to test the innovation model by the panel data of the second Taiwan Innovation Survey including 948 service firms. Empirical insights enable us to have a better understanding in terms of how service companies learn from external knowledge sources. This paper suggests that the impact of openness strategies on innovation performance becomes indirect through the partial mediator of intellectual capital so that innovation performance in service industry benefits from simultaneously incorporating intellectual capital with the efficient openness strategies. Finally, the paper includes implications for more insights into how service companies improve their innovative activities with external searching strategies and practices in terms of intellectual capital.

[1]  J. Medina-Garrido,et al.  Determinants of the Propensity for Innovation among Entrepreneurs in the Tourism Industry , 2020, Sustainability.

[2]  M. Verreynne,et al.  Entrepreneurial behaviour: a new perspective on the role of the HR professional , 2019, Personnel Review.

[3]  P. Carlile,et al.  “Opening Innovation” Across Layers of Practices: Developing an Integrative View of the Emergence of Digital Health , 2019, Managing Inter-organizational Collaborations: Process Views.

[4]  Muhamad Khalil Omar,et al.  The Effect of Organizational Learning Capability as a Mediating Variable in the Relationship between Green Intellectual Capital and Business Sustainability: Evidence from the Manufacturing Sector , 2019, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences.

[5]  Hsian-Ming Liu,et al.  The moderating effect of competitive status on the relationship between customer satisfaction and retention , 2019 .

[6]  N. Khan,et al.  The Role of Entrepreneurial Strategy, Network Ties, Human and Financial Capital in New Venture Performance , 2019, Journal of Risk and Financial Management.

[7]  Bilal Afsar,et al.  The Influence of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Types of Process Innovation Capabilities and Moderating Role of Social Capital , 2018, Entrepreneurship Research Journal.

[8]  M.M. de Carvalho,et al.  Evolution of the open innovation paradigm: Towards a contingent conceptual model , 2018, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[9]  C. Rowley,et al.  Taking stock of social capital research: its application in service-oriented firms , 2018 .

[10]  C. Rowley,et al.  Social capital in service-oriented firms: future directions , 2018 .

[11]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  The application of human resource management policies within the marketing organization: The impact on business and marketing strategy implementation , 2018 .

[12]  A. Kianto,et al.  Knowledge-based human resource management practices, intellectual capital and innovation , 2017 .

[13]  Antonello Cammarano,et al.  Open innovation and intellectual property: a knowledge-based approach , 2017 .

[14]  Florinda Matos,et al.  Knowledge management as a factor for the formulation and implementation of organization strategy , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[15]  Oscar F. Bustinza,et al.  Servitization: revisiting the state-of-the-art and research priorities , 2017 .

[16]  E. Miles,et al.  Human resource development and human resource management levers for sustained competitive advantage: Combining isomorphism and differentiation , 2016, Journal of Management & Organization.

[17]  Mercedes Rodriguez,et al.  Innovation strategies, innovator types and openness: a study of KIBS firms in Spain , 2016 .

[18]  A. Oke,et al.  Human capital, service innovation advantage, and business performance: The moderating roles of dynamic and competitive environments , 2016 .

[19]  A. Hughes,et al.  Open service innovation and the firm's search for external knowledge , 2014 .

[20]  C. Chou,et al.  The impact of open innovation on firm performance: The moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence , 2013 .

[21]  Andræs Barge-Gil,et al.  Open Strategies and Innovation Performance , 2013 .

[22]  B. Looy,et al.  Servitization: Disentangling the Impact of Service Business Model Innovation on Manufacturing Firm Performance , 2013 .

[23]  I. Chaston.  Independent financial advisors: open innovation and business performance , 2013 .

[24]  U. Lichtenthaler,et al.  A Capability-Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity , 2009 .

[25]  John P. Rice,et al.  The role of absorptive capacity in facilitating "open innovation" outcomes: A study of Australian SMEs in the manufacturing sector , 2009 .

[26]  Nick Bontis,et al.  A scientometric analysis of the Proceedings of the McMaster World Congress on the Management of Intellectual Capital and Innovation for the 1996‐2008 period , 2009 .

[27]  Joakim Wincent,et al.  Network Board Continuity and Effectiveness of Open Innovation in Swedish Strategic Small-Firm Networks , 2009 .

[28]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[29]  M. Chen,et al.  Does innovation lead to performance? An empirical study of SMEs in Taiwan , 2007 .

[30]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[31]  Wen-Nan Tsan,et al.  Intellectual capital system interaction in Taiwan , 2005 .

[32]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[33]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[34]  A. Witteloostuijn,et al.  Common Method Variance in International Business Research: Further Reflections , 2019 .

[35]  Bart van Looy,et al.  Servitization: Disentangling the Impact of Service Business Model Innovation on Manufacturing Firm Performance , 2013 .

[36]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.