Physically constrained voxel‐based penalty adaptation for ultra‐fast IMRT planning

Conventional treatment planning in intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a trial‐and‐error process that usually involves tedious tweaking of optimization parameters. Here, we present an algorithm that automates part of this process, in particular the adaptation of voxel‐based penalties within normal tissue. Thereby, the proposed algorithm explicitly considers a priori known physical limitations of photon irradiation. The efficacy of the developed algorithm is assessed during treatment planning studies comprising 16 prostate and 5 head and neck cases. We study the eradication of hot spots in the normal tissue, effects on target coverage and target conformity, as well as selected dose volume points for organs at risk. The potential of the proposed method to generate class solutions for the two indications is investigated. Run‐times of the algorithms are reported. Physically constrained voxel‐based penalty adaptation is an adequate means to automatically detect and eradicate hot‐spots during IMRT planning while maintaining target coverage and conformity. Negative effects on organs at risk are comparably small and restricted to lower doses. Using physically constrained voxel‐based penalty adaptation, it was possible to improve the generation of class solutions for both indications. Considering the reported run‐times of less than 20 s, physically constrained voxel‐based penalty adaptation has the potential to reduce the clinical workload during planning and automated treatment plan generation in the long run, facilitating adaptive radiation treatments. PACS number(s): 87.55.de

[1]  A L Boyer,et al.  Optimization of importance factors in inverse planning. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Minsun Kim,et al.  The use of a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm to increase flexibility in the search for better IMRT plans. , 2012, Medical physics.

[3]  Peter Ziegenhein,et al.  Interactive dose shaping part 2: proof of concept study for six prostate patients , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Lei Xing,et al.  IMRT dose shaping with regionally variable penalty scheme. , 2003, Medical physics.

[5]  Xun Jia,et al.  A multicriteria framework with voxel-dependent parameters for radiotherapy treatment plan optimization. , 2014, Medical physics.

[6]  Lei Xing,et al.  Quantitation of the a priori dosimetric capabilities of spatial points in inverse planning and its significant implication in defining IMRT solution space , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Sung Kyu Kim,et al.  Study of the penumbra for high-energy photon beams with Gafchromic™ EBT2 films , 2012 .

[8]  E. Yorke,et al.  Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Lei Xing,et al.  Toward Truly Optimal IMRT Dose Distribution: Inverse Planning with Voxel-specific Penalty , 2010, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[10]  R Mohan,et al.  Algorithms and functionality of an intensity modulated radiotherapy optimization system. , 2000, Medical physics.

[11]  R. Jeraj,et al.  Treatment plan modification using voxel-based weighting factors/dose prescription. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Inverse planning for photon and proton beams. , 2001, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[13]  Lei Xing,et al.  Inverse treatment planning with adaptively evolving voxel-dependent penalty scheme. , 2004, Medical physics.

[14]  Peter Ziegenhein,et al.  Performance-optimized clinical IMRT planning on modern CPUs , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Thomas Ludwig,et al.  Speed optimized influence matrix processing in inverse treatment planning tools , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Lei Xing,et al.  Using voxel-dependent importance factors for interactive DVH-based dose optimization. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  M. Moerland,et al.  A conformation number to quantify the degree of conformality in brachytherapy and external beam irradiation: application to the prostate. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Xun Jia,et al.  A DVH-guided IMRT optimization algorithm for automatic treatment planning and adaptive radiotherapy replanning. , 2014, Medical physics.

[19]  David Craft,et al.  An approach for practical multiobjective IMRT treatment planning. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  Linghong Zhou,et al.  Automatic treatment plan re-optimization for adaptive radiotherapy guided with the initial plan DVHs , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  T. Bortfeld IMRT: a review and preview , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Gunilla Borgefors,et al.  On Digital Distance Transforms in Three Dimensions , 1996, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[23]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  B W Raaymakers,et al.  Fast online Monte Carlo-based IMRT planning for the MRI linear accelerator , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  David Craft,et al.  Exploration of tradeoffs in intensity-modulated radiotherapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Philipp Hennig,et al.  Analytical probabilistic modeling for radiation therapy treatment planning , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Jan J W Lagendijk,et al.  The magnetic resonance imaging-linac system. , 2014, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[28]  Gunilla Borgefors,et al.  Distance transformations in digital images , 1986, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[29]  Sebastiaan Breedveld,et al.  A novel approach to multi-criteria inverse planning for IMRT , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.