Pharmacological facilitation of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: is the slope of the curve the shape of the future?

Current options for reperfusion therapy in patients admitted to a community hospital without cardiac catheterization facilities include administration of fibrinolytic drugs followed by observation, with referral to angiography driven by symptoms and signs of ischemia; transfer to a tertiary care center for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); or a strategy of facilitated PCI in which administration of fibrinolytics and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (alone or in combination) is followed by transfer for immediate angiography and PCI if appropriate. We systematically analyzed multiple randomized and nonrandomized trials to review the pathophysiology of reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction to derive insights about the likelihood of success of a strategy of facilitated PCI compared with transfer only or fibrinolysis only. The basis for the recommendations made herein is a hypothetical curve relating the duration of symptoms before reperfusion to reduction in mortality and extent of myocardial salvage. During the first 2 to 3 hours after symptom onset, a striking benefit of reperfusion is present; within this period, time to treatment is critical. Subsequently, a mortality benefit is still present but of decreasing magnitude over time. In this situation, the priority is to open the artery, and time to treatment is less critical. Results of facilitated PCI may depend largely on timing of presentation. If presentation is late after symptom onset (ie, on the "flat" part of the curve), there will be little mortality benefit from earlier patency and patients will be subject to the bleeding risks of fibrinolytic drugs. In contrast, among patients presenting very early (60-90 minutes after symptom onset), outcomes with fibrinolytic therapy alone are excellent, and it will be difficult for any other strategy to result in a significant improvement. But in patients presenting 2 to 3 hours after onset of symptoms, a strategy of facilitated PCI may move patients from the plateau to the descending limb of the curve, with a substantial improvement in myocardial salvage and mortality. Two large ongoing trials may provide definitive answers to these issues.

[1]  G. Wells,et al.  Combined angioplasty and pharmacological intervention versus thrombolysis alone in acute myocardial infarction (CAPITAL AMI study). , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  B. Gersh,et al.  To open or not to open: that remains the question. , 2004, European heart journal.

[3]  R. Porcher,et al.  DECOPI (DEsobstruction COronaire en Post-Infarctus): a randomized multi-centre trial of occluded artery angioplasty after acute myocardial infarction. , 2004, European heart journal.

[4]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  A randomized trial of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty as a rescue intervention after failed thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  M. A. Kellett,et al.  Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Performed at Centers Without and With Onsite Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery , 2004 .

[6]  F. Fernández‐Avilés,et al.  Routine invasive strategy within 24 hours of thrombolysis versus ischaemia-guided conservative approach for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (GRACIA-1): a randomised controlled trial , 2004, The Lancet.

[7]  F. Verheugt Lyse now, stent later: the grace of GRACIA , 2004, The Lancet.

[8]  M. de Belder,et al.  A randomized trial of rescue angioplasty versus a conservative approach for failed fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the Middlesbrough Early Revascularization to Limit INfarction (MERLIN) trial. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Aborted myocardial infarction in patients with ST-segment elevation: insights from the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Regimen-3 Trial Electrocardiographic Substudy. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  R. Califf,et al.  Rationale and strategies for implementing community-based transfer protocols for primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  B. Gersh,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgical capability. , 2004, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[12]  J. J. Griffin,et al.  Impact of intravenous beta-blockade before primary angioplasty on survival in patients undergoing mechanical reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  H. Suryapranata,et al.  Preprocedural TIMI flow and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  B. Gersh,et al.  Impact of ST-segment resolution after primary angioplasty on outcomes after myocardial infarction in elderly patients: an analysis from the CADILLAC trial. , 2004, American heart journal.

[15]  Elliott M. Antman,et al.  Time Delay to Treatment and Mortality in Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Every Minute of Delay Counts , 2004, Circulation.

[16]  Jamie D. Feusner,et al.  Early Administration of Reteplase Plus Abciximab vs Abciximab Alone in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Referred for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2004 .

[17]  J. Tijssen,et al.  Short- and long-term recovery of left ventricular function predicted at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in anterior myocardial infarction. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  R. Giugliano,et al.  Selecting the best reperfusion strategy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: it's all a matter of time. , 2003, Circulation.

[19]  P. Touboul,et al.  Impact of Time to Treatment on Mortality After Prehospital Fibrinolysis or Primary Angioplasty: Data From the CAPTIM Randomized Clinical Trial , 2003, Circulation.

[20]  E. Topol,et al.  A preferred reperfusion strategy for acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  S. Assmann,et al.  Influence of thrombolytic therapy, with or without intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation, on 12-month survival in the SHOCK trial. , 2003, American heart journal.

[22]  M. Dalby,et al.  Transfer for Primary Angioplasty Versus Immediate Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis , 2003, Circulation.

[23]  B. Nallamothu,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: is timing (almost) everything? , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  H. Suryapranata,et al.  Symptom-onset-to-balloon time and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  J. J. Griffin,et al.  Benefits and Risks of Abciximab Use in Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) Trial , 2003, Circulation.

[26]  S. Nekolla,et al.  Therapy-Dependent Influence of Time-to-Treatment Interval on Myocardial Salvage in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Coronary Artery Stenting or Thrombolysis , 2003, Circulation.

[27]  C. Hofer,et al.  Beneficial effects of immediate stenting after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  M. Eisenberg,et al.  Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in the setting of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  W. O’Neill "Watchful waiting" after thrombolysis: it's time for a re-evaluation. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  G. Stone,et al.  How important is time to treatment with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction? Results from the CADILLAC trial , 2003 .

[31]  D. Moliterno,et al.  Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in early intent-to-stent treatment of acute coronary syndromes: EPISTENT, ADMIRAL, CADILLAC, and TARGET. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  J. Boura,et al.  Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction : a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials , 2022 .

[33]  M. Aschermann,et al.  Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial--PRAGUE-2. , 2003, European heart journal.

[34]  J. Ornato,et al.  Prehospital management of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a time for reappraisal in North America. , 2003, American heart journal.

[35]  William J. Rogers,et al.  Use of Emergency Medical Services in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Subsequent Quality of Care: Observations From the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 , 2002, Circulation.

[36]  B. Gersh,et al.  Rationale for on-site cardiac surgery for primary angioplasty: a time for reappraisal. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[37]  David Antoniucci,et al.  Relation of time to treatment and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary angioplasty. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[38]  Gregg W Stone,et al.  Predictors of door-to-balloon delay in primary angioplasty. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[39]  J. J. Griffin,et al.  Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  Á. Avezum,et al.  Practice variation and missed opportunities for reperfusion in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) , 2002, The Lancet.

[41]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Incidence and predictors of bleeding events after fibrinolytic therapy with fibrin-specific agents: a comparison of TNK-tPA and rt-PA. , 2001, European heart journal.

[42]  G. Stone,et al.  Importance of time to reperfusion on outcomes with primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (results from the Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Trial). , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[43]  E. Antman,et al.  Early coronary intervention following pharmacologic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (the combined TIMI 10B-TIMI 14 experience). , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[44]  G. Lamas,et al.  The late open artery hypothesis--a decade later. , 2001, American heart journal.

[45]  G. Stone,et al.  Normal Flow (TIMI-3) Before Mechanical Reperfusion Therapy Is an Independent Determinant of Survival in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Analysis From the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Trials , 2001, Circulation.

[46]  R. Califf,et al.  Shifting the open-artery hypothesis downstream: the quest for optimal reperfusion. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[47]  J. Rumsfeld,et al.  Relation between hospital primary angioplasty volume and mortality for patients with acute MI treated with primary angioplasty vs thrombolytic therapy. , 2000, JAMA.

[48]  H. White Thrombolytic therapy in the elderly , 2000, The Lancet.

[49]  W. Rogers,et al.  Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1.5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the US from 1990 through 1999: the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 1, 2 and 3. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[50]  R. Califf,et al.  Facilitation of early percutaneous coronary intervention after reteplase with or without abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results from the SPEED (GUSTO-4 Pilot) Trial. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[51]  M. de Belder,et al.  Reappraising the role of immediate intervention following thrombolytic recanalization in acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[52]  B. Brodie,et al.  Relationship between delay in performing direct coronary angioplasty and early clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, Circulation.

[53]  C M Gibson,et al.  Relationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, JAMA.

[54]  H. Suryapranata,et al.  Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory. The PRAGUE study. , 2000, European heart journal.

[55]  C M Gibson,et al.  Relationship of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade to mortality after administration of thrombolytic drugs. , 2000, Circulation.

[56]  B. Brodie,et al.  Benefit of coronary reperfusion before intervention on outcomes after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[57]  S. Greenhouse,et al.  A randomized trial comparing primary angioplasty with a strategy of short-acting thrombolysis and immediate planned rescue angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: the PACT trial , 1999 .

[58]  W. Dassen,et al.  Prospective randomised comparison between thrombolysis, rescue PTCA, and primary PTCA in patients with extensive myocardial infarction admitted to a hospital without PTCA facilities: a safety and feasibility study , 1999, Heart.

[59]  J. Gore,et al.  The association between the on‐site availability of cardiac procedures and the utilization of those services for acute myocardial infarction by payer group , 1999, Clinical cardiology.

[60]  R. Califf,et al.  Relationship between delay in performing direct coronary angioplasty and early clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the global use of strategies to open occluded arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO-IIb) trial. , 1999, Circulation.

[61]  U. Tebbe,et al.  Influence of time to treatment on early infarct-related artery patency after different thrombolytic regimens. ALKK-Study Group. , 1999, American heart journal.

[62]  A. Davie Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction , 1996, The Lancet.

[63]  Eric Boersma,et al.  Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: reappraisal of the golden hour , 1996, The Lancet.

[64]  A. Skene,et al.  Cardiac rupture associated with thrombolytic therapy: impact of time to treatment in the Late Assessment of Thrombolytic Efficacy (LATE) study. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[65]  P. Kudenchuk,et al.  Prehospital-initiated vs hospital-initiated thrombolytic therapy. The Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Trial. , 1993, JAMA.

[66]  B. Gersh,et al.  Thrombolysis and Myocardial Salvage Results of Clinical Trials and the Animal Paradigm‐ Paradoxic or Predictable? , 1993, Circulation.

[67]  W. O’Neill,et al.  A Prospective, Placebo‐Controlled, Randomized Trial of Intravenous Streptokinase and Angioplasty Versus Lone Angioplasty Therapy of Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1992, Circulation.

[68]  M. Motro,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of late in-hospital angiography and angioplasty versus conservative management after treatment with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[69]  F. Harrell,et al.  Cardiac rupture, mortality and the timing of thrombolytic therapy: a meta-analysis. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[70]  J. Gore,et al.  Comparison of immediate invasive, delayed invasive, and conservative strategies after tissue-type plasminogen activator. Results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Phase II-A trial. , 1990, Circulation.

[71]  T. Ryan,et al.  Inferior myocardial infarction. High-risk subgroups. , 1990, Circulation.

[72]  R. Califf,et al.  From myocardial salvage to patient salvage in acute myocardial infarction: the role of reperfusion therapy. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[73]  R. Wilcox Thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator in suspected acute myocardial infarction. The ASSET Study. , 1989, Chest.

[74]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Myocardial reperfusion, limitation of infarct size, reduction of left ventricular dysfunction, and improved survival. Should the paradigm be expanded? , 1989, Circulation.

[75]  K. Lee,et al.  A randomized trial of immediate versus delayed elective angioplasty after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[76]  Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Soprawivenza nell'Inf Miocardico. EFFECTIVENESS OF INTRAVENOUS THROMBOLYTIC TREATMENT IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION , 1986, The Lancet.

[77]  P. Shah,et al.  The effects of the rate of intravenous infusion of streptokinase and the duration of symptoms on the time interval to reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1985, Circulation.

[78]  Reimer Ka,et al.  The "wavefront phenomenon" of myocardial ischemic cell death. II. Transmural progression of necrosis within the framework of ischemic bed size (myocardium at risk) and collateral flow. , 1979 .