Pharmacological facilitation of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: is the slope of the curve the shape of the future?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G. Wells,et al. Combined angioplasty and pharmacological intervention versus thrombolysis alone in acute myocardial infarction (CAPITAL AMI study). , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[2] B. Gersh,et al. To open or not to open: that remains the question. , 2004, European heart journal.
[3] R. Porcher,et al. DECOPI (DEsobstruction COronaire en Post-Infarctus): a randomized multi-centre trial of occluded artery angioplasty after acute myocardial infarction. , 2004, European heart journal.
[4] M. Schwaiger,et al. A randomized trial of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty as a rescue intervention after failed thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[5] M. A. Kellett,et al. Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Performed at Centers Without and With Onsite Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery , 2004 .
[6] F. Fernández‐Avilés,et al. Routine invasive strategy within 24 hours of thrombolysis versus ischaemia-guided conservative approach for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (GRACIA-1): a randomised controlled trial , 2004, The Lancet.
[7] F. Verheugt. Lyse now, stent later: the grace of GRACIA , 2004, The Lancet.
[8] M. de Belder,et al. A randomized trial of rescue angioplasty versus a conservative approach for failed fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the Middlesbrough Early Revascularization to Limit INfarction (MERLIN) trial. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[9] P. Armstrong,et al. Aborted myocardial infarction in patients with ST-segment elevation: insights from the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Regimen-3 Trial Electrocardiographic Substudy. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[10] R. Califf,et al. Rationale and strategies for implementing community-based transfer protocols for primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[11] B. Gersh,et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgical capability. , 2004, Mayo Clinic proceedings.
[12] J. J. Griffin,et al. Impact of intravenous beta-blockade before primary angioplasty on survival in patients undergoing mechanical reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[13] H. Suryapranata,et al. Preprocedural TIMI flow and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[14] B. Gersh,et al. Impact of ST-segment resolution after primary angioplasty on outcomes after myocardial infarction in elderly patients: an analysis from the CADILLAC trial. , 2004, American heart journal.
[15] Elliott M. Antman,et al. Time Delay to Treatment and Mortality in Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Every Minute of Delay Counts , 2004, Circulation.
[16] Jamie D. Feusner,et al. Early Administration of Reteplase Plus Abciximab vs Abciximab Alone in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Referred for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2004 .
[17] J. Tijssen,et al. Short- and long-term recovery of left ventricular function predicted at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in anterior myocardial infarction. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[18] R. Giugliano,et al. Selecting the best reperfusion strategy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: it's all a matter of time. , 2003, Circulation.
[19] P. Touboul,et al. Impact of Time to Treatment on Mortality After Prehospital Fibrinolysis or Primary Angioplasty: Data From the CAPTIM Randomized Clinical Trial , 2003, Circulation.
[20] E. Topol,et al. A preferred reperfusion strategy for acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[21] S. Assmann,et al. Influence of thrombolytic therapy, with or without intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation, on 12-month survival in the SHOCK trial. , 2003, American heart journal.
[22] M. Dalby,et al. Transfer for Primary Angioplasty Versus Immediate Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis , 2003, Circulation.
[23] B. Nallamothu,et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: is timing (almost) everything? , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.
[24] H. Suryapranata,et al. Symptom-onset-to-balloon time and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[25] J. J. Griffin,et al. Benefits and Risks of Abciximab Use in Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) Trial , 2003, Circulation.
[26] S. Nekolla,et al. Therapy-Dependent Influence of Time-to-Treatment Interval on Myocardial Salvage in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Coronary Artery Stenting or Thrombolysis , 2003, Circulation.
[27] C. Hofer,et al. Beneficial effects of immediate stenting after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[28] M. Eisenberg,et al. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in the setting of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[29] W. O’Neill. "Watchful waiting" after thrombolysis: it's time for a re-evaluation. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[30] G. Stone,et al. How important is time to treatment with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction? Results from the CADILLAC trial , 2003 .
[31] D. Moliterno,et al. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in early intent-to-stent treatment of acute coronary syndromes: EPISTENT, ADMIRAL, CADILLAC, and TARGET. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[32] J. Boura,et al. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction : a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials , 2022 .
[33] M. Aschermann,et al. Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial--PRAGUE-2. , 2003, European heart journal.
[34] J. Ornato,et al. Prehospital management of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a time for reappraisal in North America. , 2003, American heart journal.
[35] William J. Rogers,et al. Use of Emergency Medical Services in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Subsequent Quality of Care: Observations From the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 , 2002, Circulation.
[36] B. Gersh,et al. Rationale for on-site cardiac surgery for primary angioplasty: a time for reappraisal. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[37] David Antoniucci,et al. Relation of time to treatment and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary angioplasty. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.
[38] Gregg W Stone,et al. Predictors of door-to-balloon delay in primary angioplasty. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.
[39] J. J. Griffin,et al. Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.
[40] Á. Avezum,et al. Practice variation and missed opportunities for reperfusion in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) , 2002, The Lancet.
[41] P. Armstrong,et al. Incidence and predictors of bleeding events after fibrinolytic therapy with fibrin-specific agents: a comparison of TNK-tPA and rt-PA. , 2001, European heart journal.
[42] G. Stone,et al. Importance of time to reperfusion on outcomes with primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (results from the Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Trial). , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.
[43] E. Antman,et al. Early coronary intervention following pharmacologic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (the combined TIMI 10B-TIMI 14 experience). , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.
[44] G. Lamas,et al. The late open artery hypothesis--a decade later. , 2001, American heart journal.
[45] G. Stone,et al. Normal Flow (TIMI-3) Before Mechanical Reperfusion Therapy Is an Independent Determinant of Survival in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Analysis From the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Trials , 2001, Circulation.
[46] R. Califf,et al. Shifting the open-artery hypothesis downstream: the quest for optimal reperfusion. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[47] J. Rumsfeld,et al. Relation between hospital primary angioplasty volume and mortality for patients with acute MI treated with primary angioplasty vs thrombolytic therapy. , 2000, JAMA.
[48] H. White. Thrombolytic therapy in the elderly , 2000, The Lancet.
[49] W. Rogers,et al. Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1.5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the US from 1990 through 1999: the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 1, 2 and 3. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[50] R. Califf,et al. Facilitation of early percutaneous coronary intervention after reteplase with or without abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results from the SPEED (GUSTO-4 Pilot) Trial. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[51] M. de Belder,et al. Reappraising the role of immediate intervention following thrombolytic recanalization in acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.
[52] B. Brodie,et al. Relationship between delay in performing direct coronary angioplasty and early clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, Circulation.
[53] C M Gibson,et al. Relationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, JAMA.
[54] H. Suryapranata,et al. Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory. The PRAGUE study. , 2000, European heart journal.
[55] C M Gibson,et al. Relationship of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade to mortality after administration of thrombolytic drugs. , 2000, Circulation.
[56] B. Brodie,et al. Benefit of coronary reperfusion before intervention on outcomes after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.
[57] S. Greenhouse,et al. A randomized trial comparing primary angioplasty with a strategy of short-acting thrombolysis and immediate planned rescue angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: the PACT trial , 1999 .
[58] W. Dassen,et al. Prospective randomised comparison between thrombolysis, rescue PTCA, and primary PTCA in patients with extensive myocardial infarction admitted to a hospital without PTCA facilities: a safety and feasibility study , 1999, Heart.
[59] J. Gore,et al. The association between the on‐site availability of cardiac procedures and the utilization of those services for acute myocardial infarction by payer group , 1999, Clinical cardiology.
[60] R. Califf,et al. Relationship between delay in performing direct coronary angioplasty and early clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the global use of strategies to open occluded arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO-IIb) trial. , 1999, Circulation.
[61] U. Tebbe,et al. Influence of time to treatment on early infarct-related artery patency after different thrombolytic regimens. ALKK-Study Group. , 1999, American heart journal.
[62] A. Davie. Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction , 1996, The Lancet.
[63] Eric Boersma,et al. Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: reappraisal of the golden hour , 1996, The Lancet.
[64] A. Skene,et al. Cardiac rupture associated with thrombolytic therapy: impact of time to treatment in the Late Assessment of Thrombolytic Efficacy (LATE) study. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[65] P. Kudenchuk,et al. Prehospital-initiated vs hospital-initiated thrombolytic therapy. The Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Trial. , 1993, JAMA.
[66] B. Gersh,et al. Thrombolysis and Myocardial Salvage Results of Clinical Trials and the Animal Paradigm‐ Paradoxic or Predictable? , 1993, Circulation.
[67] W. O’Neill,et al. A Prospective, Placebo‐Controlled, Randomized Trial of Intravenous Streptokinase and Angioplasty Versus Lone Angioplasty Therapy of Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1992, Circulation.
[68] M. Motro,et al. Randomized controlled trial of late in-hospital angiography and angioplasty versus conservative management after treatment with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.
[69] F. Harrell,et al. Cardiac rupture, mortality and the timing of thrombolytic therapy: a meta-analysis. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[70] J. Gore,et al. Comparison of immediate invasive, delayed invasive, and conservative strategies after tissue-type plasminogen activator. Results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Phase II-A trial. , 1990, Circulation.
[71] T. Ryan,et al. Inferior myocardial infarction. High-risk subgroups. , 1990, Circulation.
[72] R. Califf,et al. From myocardial salvage to patient salvage in acute myocardial infarction: the role of reperfusion therapy. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[73] R. Wilcox. Thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator in suspected acute myocardial infarction. The ASSET Study. , 1989, Chest.
[74] E. Braunwald,et al. Myocardial reperfusion, limitation of infarct size, reduction of left ventricular dysfunction, and improved survival. Should the paradigm be expanded? , 1989, Circulation.
[75] K. Lee,et al. A randomized trial of immediate versus delayed elective angioplasty after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.
[76] Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Soprawivenza nell'Inf Miocardico.. EFFECTIVENESS OF INTRAVENOUS THROMBOLYTIC TREATMENT IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION , 1986, The Lancet.
[77] P. Shah,et al. The effects of the rate of intravenous infusion of streptokinase and the duration of symptoms on the time interval to reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1985, Circulation.
[78] Reimer Ka,et al. The "wavefront phenomenon" of myocardial ischemic cell death. II. Transmural progression of necrosis within the framework of ischemic bed size (myocardium at risk) and collateral flow. , 1979 .