Category Spanning, Distance, and Appeal

A general finding in economic and organizational sociology states that producers and products that span categories lose appeal to audiences. This paper argues that to assess the consequences of category spanning researchers need to take account of the relations among the categories spanned. We reason that the negative consequences of category spanning are more severe when the categories spanned are distant and have high-contrast. Because previous empirical strategies do not incorporate information on category distances, here we introduce novel measures to categorical distance and derive measures for grade-of-membership, category contrast and categorical niche width. Using the proposed measurement approach, we test our theory using data on online restaurant reviews, and find that the results confirm our predictions that organizations that span distant and high-contrast categories get lower evaluations from audiences.

[1]  Michael T. Hannan,et al.  Category Reinterpretation and Defection: Modernism and Tradition in Italian Winemaking , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[2]  Michael T. Hannan,et al.  Typecasting, Legitimation, and Form Emergence: A Formal Theory* , 2011 .

[3]  Amir Goldberg.  Mapping Shared Understandings Using Relational Class Analysis: The Case of the Cultural Omnivore Reexamined1 , 2011, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Giacomo Negro,et al.  RESEARCH ON CATEGORIES IN THE SOCIOLOGY OF ORGANIZATIONS , 2010 .

[5]  H. Rao,et al.  Categorical contrast and audience appeal: niche width and critical success in winemaking , 2010 .

[6]  E. B. Smith.  Identities as Lenses: How Organizational Identity Affects Audiences' Evaluation of Organizational Performance , 2010 .

[7]  M. Hannan.  Partiality of Memberships in Categories and Audiences , 2010 .

[8]  M. Hannan,et al.  The consequences of category spanning depend on contrast , 2010 .

[9]  Michael T. Hannan,et al.  Multiple Category Memberships in Markets: An Integrative Theory and Two Empirical Tests , 2009 .

[10]  David G. McKendrick,et al.  Organizational evolution with fuzzy technological formats: tape drive producers in the world market, 1951–1998 , 2008 .

[11]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  The Organizational Construction of Authenticity: An Examination of Contemporary Food and Dining in the U.S. , 2008 .

[12]  Elizabeth G. Pontikes.  Fitting in or starting new? An analysis of invention, constraint, and the emergence of new categories in the software industry , 2008 .

[13]  Erin E Leahey,et al.  Not by Productivity Alone: How Visibility and Specialization Contribute to Academic Earnings , 2007 .

[14]  James A. Hampton,et al.  Typicality, Graded Membership, and Vagueness , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies , 2007 .

[16]  Greta Hsu.  Jacks of All Trades and Masters of None: Audiences' Reactions to Spanning Genres in Feature Film Production , 2006 .

[17]  Rodolphe Durand,et al.  Border Crossing: Bricolage and the Erosion of Categorical Boundaries in French Gastronomy , 2005 .

[18]  James N. Baron.  Employing identities in organizational ecology , 2004 .

[19]  Michael T. Hannan,et al.  A logic for theories in flux: a model-theoretic approach , 2004 .

[20]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Robust Identities or Nonentities? Typecasting in the Feature‐Film Labor Market1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  Michael T. Hannan,et al.  4. Reasoning with Partial Knowledge , 2002 .

[22]  Damon J. Phillips,et al.  Middle‐Status Conformity: Theoretical Restatement and Empirical Demonstration in Two Markets1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  Stanislav D. Dobrev,et al.  Dynamics of Niche Width and Resource Partitioning1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  M. Ruef,et al.  The Emergence of Organizational Forms: A Community Ecology Approach1 , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  David G. McKendrick,et al.  On the Genesis of Organizational Forms: Evidence from the Market for Disk Arrays , 2000 .

[26]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  R. Peterson,et al.  CHANGING HIGHBROW TASTE: FROM SNOB TO OMNIVORE* , 1996 .

[28]  V. Batagelj,et al.  Comparing resemblance measures , 1995 .

[29]  R. Peterson.  Understanding audience segmentation: From elite and mass to omnivore and univore , 1992 .

[30]  Kenneth Ward Church,et al.  Word Association Norms, Mutual Information, and Lexicography , 1989, ACL.

[31]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[32]  W. Griswold.  The Fabrication of Meaning: Literary Interpretation in the United States, Great Britain, and the West Indies , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  G. Simmel.  The Philosophy of Money , 1979 .

[34]  A. Tversky.  Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[35]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  E. Rosch.  Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[37]  Emile Durkheim,et al.  Primitive Classification (Routledge Revivals) , 1963 .

[38]  E. H. Simpson.  Measurement of Diversity , 1949, Nature.

[39]  P. Jaccard,et al.  Etude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura , 1901 .