Diffusion-weighted imaging or computerized tomography perfusion assessment with clinical mismatch in the triage of wake up and late presenting strokes undergoing neurointervention with Trevo (DAWN) trial methods

Rationale Efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke due to large vessel occlusion initiated beyond 6 h of time last seen well has not been demonstrated in randomized trials. Aim To establish whether subjects considered to have substantial areas of salvageable brain based on age-adjusted clinical core mismatch who can undergo endovascular treatment within 6–24 h from time last seen well (TLSW) have better outcomes at three months compared to subjects treated with standard medical therapy alone. Age-adjusted clinical core mismatch is defined by age (≤80 or >80 years), baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (10–20 or ≥21), and core size (0–20 cm3 in subjects older than 80 and, in subjects younger than 80, 0–30 cm3 with NIHSS 10–20 and 31–50 cm3 with NIHSS ≥21). Design Prospective, randomized, multicenter, Bayesian adaptive-enrichment, open label trial with blinded endpoint assessment. For the purpose of enrolment, ischemic core size will be evaluated by CT perfusion or magnetic resonance imaging-diffusion-weighted imaging measured by automated software (RAPID). Procedures Subjects with acute ischemic stroke due to computed tomography angiography- or magnetic resonance angiogram-proven arterial occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid and/or proximal middle cerebral artery (M1) with age-adjusted clinical core mismatch in whom treatment can be initiated between 6 and 24 h from TSLW are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive mechanical embolectomy with the Trevo device or medical management alone. Sequential interim analyses allowing adaptation of enrolment criteria or stopping new enrolment for futility or predicted success will occur in every 50 randomized patients starting at 150 to a maximum of 500 patients. Study outcomes The primary endpoint is the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. The primary safety outcome is stroke-related mortality at 90 days. Analysis The primary endpoint, expressed as a utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale score is analyzed using a Bayesian posterior probability with adjustment for ischemic core size. For regulatory reasons, a nested co-primary endpoint analysis was added consisting of the proportion of subjects with modified Rankin Scale 0–2 between the active and control groups also analyzed using a Bayesian model.

[1]  Adnan H Siddiqui,et al.  Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis. , 2016, JAMA.

[2]  C. Molina,et al.  Age-adjusted infarct volume threshold for good outcome after endovascular treatment , 2013, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[3]  D. Liebeskind,et al.  Collaterals in endovascular therapy for stroke. , 2015, Current opinion in neurology.

[4]  J. Grotta,et al.  Adopting a Patient-Centered Approach to Primary Outcome Analysis of Acute Stroke Trials Using a Utility-Weighted Modified Rankin Scale , 2015, Stroke.

[5]  C. Molina,et al.  Association Between Time to Reperfusion and Outcome Is Primarily Driven by the Time From Imaging to Reperfusion , 2016, Stroke.

[6]  M. Kaste,et al.  Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II) , 1998, The Lancet.

[7]  Roland Bammer,et al.  Ischemic core and hypoperfusion volumes predict infarct size in SWIFT PRIME , 2016, Annals of neurology.

[8]  P Trouillas,et al.  Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study Investigators. , 1998, Lancet.

[9]  S. Pedraza,et al.  The clinical–DWI mismatch , 2004, Neurology.

[10]  Jeffrey L Saver,et al.  Quantifying the Value of Stroke Disability Outcomes: WHO Global Burden of Disease Project Disability Weights for Each Level of the Modified Rankin Scale , 2009, Stroke.

[11]  M. Mlynash,et al.  Pittsburgh Outcomes After Stroke Thrombectomy Score Predicts Outcomes After Endovascular Therapy for Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusions , 2014, Stroke.

[12]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Quantifying the value of urban form , 2014 .

[13]  D. Liebeskind,et al.  Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable: The Next Generation of Endovascular Trials , 2016, Stroke.

[14]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  Letter by Mulder et al Regarding Article, "2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association". , 2019, Stroke.

[15]  H. Diener,et al.  Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Oliver Rivero-Arias,et al.  Mapping the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Measurement into the Generic EuroQol (EQ-5D) Health Outcome , 2010, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[17]  Manabu Inoue,et al.  MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study , 2012, The Lancet Neurology.

[18]  Jeffrey L Saver,et al.  Optimal End Points for Acute Stroke Therapy Trials: Best Ways to Measure Treatment Effects of Drugs and Devices , 2011, Stroke.

[19]  Catherine Oppenheim,et al.  Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trial , 2016, The Lancet Neurology.

[20]  Manabu Inoue,et al.  Response to endovascular reperfusion is not time-dependent in patients with salvageable tissue , 2015, Neurology.

[21]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials , 2016, The Lancet.

[22]  Linda Worrall,et al.  Clinical guidelines for acute stroke management , 2007 .

[23]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Hyperacute Stroke Care Guidelines, Update 2015 , 2015, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[24]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  K. Hill Australian Clinical Guidelines for Acute Stroke Management 2007 , 2008, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[26]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  C. Sorensen,et al.  Randomized Assessment of Rapid Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke , 2015 .

[28]  Eso Writing,et al.  Guidelines for Management of Ischaemic Stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack 2008 , 2008 .

[29]  W. Copen,et al.  Existence of the diffusion-perfusion mismatch within 24 hours after onset of acute stroke: dependence on proximal arterial occlusion. , 2009, Radiology.

[30]  M. Krause,et al.  Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  R. Higashida,et al.  Trial Design and Reporting Standards for Intra-Arterial Cerebral Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke , 2003, Stroke.

[32]  A. Rai,et al.  Imaging-Based Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke due to Proximal Intracranial Anterior Circulation Occlusion Treated Beyond 8 Hours From Time Last Seen Well: Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of 237 Consecutive Patients , 2011, Stroke.