Computer simulation: how can it help the surgeon optimize implant position?

Component placement critically affects the performance and longevity of total hip replacements (THRs). Because of limitations of observation and anatomic orientation imposed by the operative site, selection of the correct size, and position of the acetabular and femoral components is best done through preoperative planning. Currently, this is done by comparing two-dimensional templates of prosthetic components with clinical radiographs; however, this method has the inherent limitation that AP and lateral radiographs each provide one projection of the pelvis and the femur. Computer technology makes it possible to observe implantation of the femoral and acetabular components in three dimensions. This approach allows surgeons to template with superior accuracy, while providing an intimate view of the fit of the components in the implantation site. Additionally, computer routines can predict the functional outcome of a preoperative plan before its implementation. Restoration of leg length, center of rotation, ROM of the joint during various activities, and points of bony and prosthetic impingement can be analyzed preoperatively by the surgeon. This is a valuable tool for surgical navigation and surgeon training. With emerging technologic advances in surgical technique, computer-based preoperative planning tools should prove all the more essential to reliable component placement.

[1]  H. Baba,et al.  Nonlinear three-dimensional finite element analysis of newly designed cementless total hip stems. , 1999, Artificial organs.

[2]  Maurice E. M Ler Lessons of 30 Years of Total Hip Arthroplasty , 1992 .

[3]  T. Brown,et al.  Experimental and computational simulation of total hip arthroplasty dislocation. , 2001, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[4]  U Langlotz,et al.  A fast impingement detection algorithm for computer-aided orthopedic surgery. , 2001, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[5]  W. Bargar,et al.  Primary and Revision Total Hip Replacement Using the Robodoc® System , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  S. Delp,et al.  Effects of hip center location on the moment-generating capacity of the muscles. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  G. Smidt,et al.  Hip motion measurements for selected activities of daily living. , 1970, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  C. Mazel,et al.  [Value of preoperative planning in total hip arthroplasty]. , 2002, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[9]  V. Tan,et al.  Independent contribution of elevated-rim acetabular liner and femoral head size to the stability of total hip implants. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  L. Stark,et al.  Muscle models: What is gained and what is lost by varying model complexity , 1987, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  J. Lewis,et al.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  W H Harris,et al.  Elevated-rim acetabular components. Effect on range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty. , 1991, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  D. Kohn,et al.  Femoral anatomy, computed tomography and computer-aided design of prosthetic implants , 2002, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[14]  T. Lund,et al.  A new approach to computer-aided spine surgery: fluoroscopy-based surgical navigation , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[15]  J. McAuley,et al.  Preoperative planning to prevent dislocation of the hip. , 2001, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[16]  B Jaramaz,et al.  Image Guided Navigation System to Measure Intraoperatively Acetabular Implant Alignment , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  H. Tullos,et al.  Effect of rotation on the radiographic appearance of the femoral canal. , 1994, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[18]  B F Morrey,et al.  Difficult complications after hip joint replacement. Dislocation. , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  T. Young,et al.  Determination of accuracy of preoperative templating of noncemented femoral prostheses. , 1995, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[20]  The effect of component design on range of motion to impingement in total hip arthroplasty. , 2001, Instructional course lectures.

[21]  W H Harris,et al.  Advances in surgical technique for total hip replacement: without and with osteotomy of the greater trochanter. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  M B Millis,et al.  Impingement simulation of the hip in SCFE using 3D models. , 1999, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[23]  S. Kelley,et al.  The Influence of Patient-Related Factors and the Position of the Acetabular Component on the Rate of Dislocation after Total Hip Replacement* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  S. Azen,et al.  Normal range of motion of joints in male subjects. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  P. Noble,et al.  A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[26]  J. W. Knight,et al.  Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplastyQuantitating its utility and precision , 1992 .

[27]  D R Laster,et al.  Stem design and dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical results and computer modeling. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[28]  W. Harris,et al.  A novel constrained acetabular liner design with increased range of motion. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[29]  A Coblentz,et al.  Micromotion, Fit, and Fill of Custom Made Femoral Stems Designed With an Automated Process , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[30]  John J Callaghan,et al.  Kinematics, kinetics, and finite element analysis of commonplace maneuvers at risk for total hip dislocation. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  D. D’Lima,et al.  The Effect of the Orientation of the Acetabular and Femoral Components on the Range of Motion of the Hip at Different Head-Neck Ratios* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.