The Changing View of Input in the Treatment of Children With Grammatical Deficits.

Purpose The purpose of this article is to present 3 approaches that emphasize the role that input plays in the treatment of grammatical deficits in children with language impairments. Method These approaches-input informativeness, competing sources of input, and high variability-were selected because they go beyond issues of token frequency and emphasize instead type frequency, relative frequency, and frequency at an abstract as well as a concrete level of grammar. Each of these approaches can be applied to the grammatical deficits seen in children with specific language impairment and can be readily used with well-established procedures, such as focused stimulation and recasting. Results Each approach is supported by a body of laboratory research with children with typical language skills, and the feasibility of each has been tested in studies with a treatment design. Furthermore, the assumptions of the 3 approaches are largely compatible, permitting application of combinations of these approaches without violating any of their principles. Conclusion The positive findings from each of these approaches should serve as a basis for further clinical research.

[1]  Fernand Gobet,et al.  Modeling the Development of Children's Use of Optional Infinitives in Dutch and English Using MOSAIC , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Laura M. Justice,et al.  Relations Among Maternal Literacy Beliefs, Home Literacy Practices, and the Emergent Literacy Skills of Preschoolers With Specific Language Impairment , 2008 .

[3]  R. Gillam,et al.  Verbal and spatial information processing constraints in children with specific language impairment. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[4]  Alison J. Bahnsen,et al.  Predictors of morphosyntactic growth in typically developing toddlers: contributions of parent input and child sex. , 2011, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[5]  G. Conti-Ramsden,et al.  Mother-child interactions with language-impaired children and their siblings. , 1991, The British journal of disorders of communication.

[6]  L. Leonard,et al.  A Clinical Evaluation of the Competing Sources of Input Hypothesis. , 2017, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[7]  R. Paul,et al.  Maternal linguistic input to toddlers with slow expressive language development. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  L. Leonard,et al.  Some differences between English plural noun inflections and third singular verb inflections in the input: the contributions of frequency, sentence position, and duration , 1999, Journal of Child Language.

[9]  Pamela Ann Hadley,et al.  Toy talk: simple strategies to create richer grammatical input. , 2014, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[10]  Fernand Gobet,et al.  Simulating the Referential Properties of Dutch, German, and English Root Infinitives in MOSAIC , 2009 .

[11]  Matthew Rispoli,et al.  Sequence and system in the acquisition of tense and agreement. , 2012, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[12]  Mary Alt,et al.  Using principles of learning to inform language therapy design for children with specific language impairment. , 2012, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[13]  Dorothy V. M. Bishop,et al.  Uncommon Understanding: Development and Disorders of Language Comprehension in Children , 1997 .

[14]  P. Hadley,et al.  Individual differences in the onset of tense marking: a growth-curve analysis. , 2006, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[15]  Dan I. Slobin The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition : Volume 1: the Data , 2017 .

[16]  W. Dressler,et al.  On the role of morphological richness in the early development of noun and verb inflection , 2011 .

[17]  R. Plomin,et al.  Why does parental language input style predict child language development? A twin study of gene–environment correlation , 2015, Journal of communication disorders.

[18]  L. Gerken,et al.  Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories , 2005, Journal of Child Language.

[19]  L. Gerken,et al.  An Overview of Prosody and Its Role in Normal and Disordered Child Language , 1998 .

[20]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The role of the input in the acquisition of third person singular verbs in English. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[21]  R. Gómez Variability and Detection of Invariant Structure , 2002, Psychological science.

[22]  Julia L. Evans,et al.  Complex sentence comprehension and working memory in children with specific language impairment. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[23]  A. V. Van Horne,et al.  The efficacy of recasts in language intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology.

[24]  M. Tomasello Do young children have adult syntactic competence? , 2000, Cognition.

[25]  E. Plante,et al.  What influences children's conceptualizations of language input? , 2013, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[26]  G. Conti-Ramsden,et al.  Contingency and breakdown: children with SLI and their conversations with mothers and fathers. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[27]  L. Leonard,et al.  Subordinate clause comprehension and tense/agreement inconsistency in children with specific language impairment. , 2016, Journal of communication disorders.

[28]  Matthew Rispoli,et al.  Are some parents' interaction styles associated with richer grammatical input? , 2013, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[29]  A. Warlaumont,et al.  Caregivers' suffix frequencies and suffix acquisition by language impaired, late talking, and typically developing children. , 2012, Journal of child language.

[30]  Ning Hsu,et al.  Input Subject Diversity Enhances Early Grammatical Growth: Evidence from a Parent-Implemented Intervention , 2017, Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development.

[31]  K. Nelson,et al.  Treatment efficiency as a function of target selection in the remediation of child language disorders. , 1992, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[32]  Fernand Gobet,et al.  Modeling the Developmental Patterning of Finiteness Marking in English, Dutch, German, and Spanish Using MOSAIC , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[33]  S H Long,et al.  Two approaches to the facilitation of grammar in children with language impairment: an experimental evaluation. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[34]  Patricia Deevy,et al.  Input distribution influences degree of auxiliary use by children with specific language impairment , 2011, Cognitive linguistics.

[35]  K. Wexler,et al.  Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[36]  L. Leonard,et al.  Input sources of third person singular -s inconsistency in children with and without specific language impairment* , 2014, Journal of Child Language.

[37]  N. Hyams,et al.  Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory Missing Subjects in Early Child Language , 2022 .

[38]  J. Pine,et al.  Explaining Quantitative Variation in the Rate of Optional Infinitive Errors across Languages: a Comparison of Mosaic and the Variational Learning Model* , 2009 .

[39]  Rebecca L Gómez,et al.  The effects of variation on learning word order rules by adults with and without language-based learning disabilities. , 2006, Journal of communication disorders.

[40]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition , 2015, Journal of Child Language.

[41]  L. Leonard,et al.  Role of linguistic input in third person singular -s use in the speech of young children. , 2010, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[42]  L. Leonard,et al.  Tense and agreement in the speech of children with specific language impairment: patterns of generalization through intervention. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[43]  C. Rowland Explaining errors in children’s questions , 2007, Cognition.

[44]  M. Rowe Input versus intake – a commentary on Ambridge, Kidd, Rowland, and Theakson's ‘The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition’ , 2015, Journal of Child Language.

[45]  D. Loeb,et al.  Parental Recasts and Production of Copulas and Articles by Children With Specific Language Impairment and Typical Language , 2001 .

[46]  Andrew Radford,et al.  Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: Index , 1997 .

[47]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Can input explain children's me-for-I errors?* , 2009, Journal of Child Language.

[48]  S. Warren,et al.  Differential treatment intensity research: a missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions. , 2007, Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews.

[49]  Charles D. Yang,et al.  Morphosyntactic Learning and the Development of Tense , 2007 .

[50]  Laurence B. Leonard,et al.  Children with Specific Language Impairment , 1997 .

[51]  Andrew Radford,et al.  Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: A Minimalist Approach , 1997 .

[52]  Diane Frome Loeb,et al.  An evaluation of the facilitative effects of inverted yes-no questions on the acquisition of auxiliary verbs. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[53]  Charles D. Yang,et al.  Knowledge and learning in natural language , 2000 .

[54]  J. Oetting,et al.  Auxiliary BE production by African American English-speaking children with and without specific language impairment. , 2010, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[55]  Christina Meyers,et al.  Variability in the language input to children enhances learning in a treatment context. , 2014, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[56]  M. Rispoli,et al.  The growth of tense productivity. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[57]  Bruno Estigarribia,et al.  Facilitation by Variation: Right-to-Left Learning of English Yes/No Questions , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[58]  L. Leonard An Invited Article Facilitating linguistic skills in children with specific language impairment , 1981, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[59]  J. Tomblin,et al.  The role of developmental levels in examining the effect of subject types on the production of auxiliary is in young english-speaking children. , 2011, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[60]  V. Marchman,et al.  Sensitivity to Morphosyntactic Information in 3-Year-Old Children With Typical Language Development: A Feasibility Study. , 2017, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[61]  R. Gómez,et al.  Exemplar variability facilitates rapid learning of an otherwise unlearnable grammar by individuals with language-based learning disability. , 2013, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[62]  Pamela A Hadley,et al.  The onset of tense marking in children at risk for specific language impairment. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[63]  L. DeThorne,et al.  Clinician-child interactions: adjustments in linguistic complexity. , 2007, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[64]  David Crystal,et al.  A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics , 1997 .