Effects of a buffered propionic acid in diets on the performance of broiler chickens and on microflora of the intestine and carcass.

A buffered propionic acid (BPA) was added to broiler diets fed in floor pens with litter. The BPA was fed continuously at 0, .2, .4, and .8% in Trial 1 and at 0 and .4% in Trial 2. The BPA was also fed at .4% for the last 7 days in Trial 2. Natural salmonellae exposure versus periodic dosage with Salmonella typhimurium was compared in Trial 2. In Trial 1, the BPA supplement had no adverse effects on growth, feed utilization, or abdominal fat with a significant (P less than or equal to .05) increase in the female dressing value at .8% of buffered propionic acid. The total number of coliforms and of Escherichia coli in the duodenum were significantly reduced by .4% BPA; in the jejunum, by all levels used in the trials; and in the ileum, by .4% and .8% of buffered propionic acid. The intestinal pH was not influenced by the BPA addition. In Trial 2, the BPA at .4% fed continuously had no adverse effect on growth, feed utilization, the abdominal fat of females, or the dressing percentage of males while significantly reducing the abdominal fat for males and increasing the dressing percentage for females. Feeding .4% BPA for the last 7 days had no effect on any of these parameters. Periodic dosage with S. typhimurium had no effect on body weight, feed utilization, or abdominal fat and significantly increased the dressing percentage. There was a significant interaction between the Salmonella dosage and the time of feeding BPA on dressing percentage.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  J. Rouse,et al.  Effect of chemical treatment of poultry feed on survival of Salmonella. , 1988, Poultry science.

[2]  P. Waldroup,et al.  Use of organic acids in broiler diets. , 1988, Poultry science.

[3]  J. R. Walton The effect of dietary zinc bacitracin on the resistance status of intestinal Escherichia coli and enterococci from broiler chickens. , 2010, Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe B. Journal of veterinary medicine. Series B.

[4]  R. C. Dixon,et al.  Effect of Feed Ingredients on the Antifungal Activity of Propionic Acid , 1981 .

[5]  H. Vogt,et al.  The effect of organic acids in the rations on the performances of broilers and laying hens , 1981 .

[6]  H. Lior,et al.  Sources of salmonellae in an uninfected commercially-processed broiler flock. , 1980, Canadian journal of comparative medicine : Revue canadienne de medecine comparee.

[7]  P. Vanderwal Salmonella Control of Feedstuffs by Pelleting or Acid Treatment , 1979 .

[8]  N. Paster A Commercial Scale Study of the Efficiency of Propionic Acid and Calcium Propionate as Fungistats in Poultry Feed , 1979 .

[9]  J. R. Walton The Effect of Zinc Bacitracin on the Susceptibility of Selected Gram Negative and Gram Positive Bacteria to Therapeutic Antibiotics , 1978, Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe B. Journal of veterinary medicine. Series B.

[10]  R. Wyatt,et al.  Effect of Commercial Antifungal Compounds on the Performance of Broiler Chickens , 1977 .

[11]  R. Bird,et al.  A possible mechanism to explain the growth promotion effect of feed antibiotics in farm animals: zinc bacitracin induced cell wall damage in Escherichia coli in vitro. , 2010, Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe B. Journal of veterinary medicine. Series B.

[12]  J. Wells,et al.  Salmonella contamination in a poultry-processing plant. , 1970, Applied microbiology.

[13]  F. Bryan,et al.  Contributory sources of Salmonellae on turkey products. , 1968, American journal of epidemiology.