Future Learning Spaces for Learning Communities: New Directions and Conceptual Frameworks

This symposium presents our efforts to reconceptualize learning spaces from their traditional notions as bound and immutable to a view in which the physical and social boundaries are flexible and dynamically connected to the learning itself. We present the work from five international research centers that consider space as a multi-dimensional mediational tool that shapes, and is shaped by, the learning communities who use them. In each case, researchers will present their innovative spaces along with the learning community frameworks they use to describe and design them. Each study demonstrates specific insights regarding how to conceptualize and design Future Learning Spaces for Learning Communities.

[1]  Deborah A. Fields,et al.  Entering the Clubhouse: Case Studies of Young Programmers Joining the Online Scratch Communities , 2010, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[2]  M. Wallace,et al.  Professional Learning Communities: A Review of the Literature , 2006 .

[3]  J. Gee Identity as an analytic lens for research in education , 2000 .

[4]  R. Sawyer Introduction: the new science of learning , 2014 .

[5]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  How Does Technology-Enabled Active Learning Affect Undergraduate Students' Understanding of Electromagnetism Concepts? , 2005 .

[6]  R. Beichner The Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs (SCALE-UP) Project , 2007 .

[7]  Eric Rosenbaum,et al.  Scratch: programming for all , 2009, Commun. ACM.

[8]  Scott P. McDonald,et al.  Learning Theory Expertise in the Design of Learning Spaces: Who Needs a Seat at the Table?. , 2015 .

[9]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided discovery in a community of learners. , 1994 .

[10]  Tom Moher,et al.  WallCology: designing interaction affordances for learner engagement in authentic science inquiry , 2008, CHI.

[11]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology , 2006 .

[12]  William J. Clancey,et al.  Learning as Social and Neural , 1992 .

[13]  Kathleen Hogan,et al.  Viewing Classrooms as Cultural Contexts for Fostering Scientific Literacy , 2001 .

[14]  Katerine Bielaczyc,et al.  Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice , 1999 .

[15]  Kevin Leander,et al.  The Changing Social Spaces of Learning: Mapping New Mobilities , 2010 .

[16]  R. Spencer Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration , 2008 .

[17]  R. Keith Sawyer Conclusion: the future of learning: grounding educational innovation in the learning sciences , 2014 .

[18]  Keri Facer,et al.  What is space for? Towards a politics and a language for the human in education , 2014 .

[19]  James D. Slotta,et al.  Knowledge Construction in the Instrumented Classroom: Supporting Student Investigations of Their Physical Learning Environment , 2015, CSCL.

[20]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[21]  Adi Kidron,et al.  Technology-Enhanced Learning Communities on a Continuum between Ambient to Designed: What Can We Learn by Synthesizing Multiple Research Perspectives? , 2015, CSCL.

[22]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity , 1998 .

[23]  Thérèse Laferrière,et al.  An International Knowledge Building Network for Sustainable Curriculum and Pedagogical Innovation. , 2012 .

[24]  Yotam Hod,et al.  Students negotiating and designing their collaborative learning norms: a group developmental perspective in learning communities , 2015, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[25]  Jianwei Zhang,et al.  Making Collective Progress Visible for Sustained Knowledge Building , 2013, CSCL.

[26]  A. Collins,et al.  Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology: The Digital Revolution and Schooling in America. Technology, Education--Connections (TEC) Series. , 2009 .

[27]  Véronique Mertl,et al.  How Students Come to Be, Know, and Do: How Students Come to Be, Know, and Do , 2010 .

[28]  Jianwei Zhang,et al.  Computer-Supported Metadiscourse to Foster Collective Progress in Knowledge-Building Communities , 2013, CSCL.

[29]  Larry Cuban Oversold and Underused , 2001 .

[30]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Community-based learning: The core competency of residential, research-based universities , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[31]  R. Pea Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education , 2018 .

[32]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice , 1995 .

[33]  R. Thornton Mediation , 2003, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

[34]  B. Rogoff Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners , 2009 .

[35]  R. A. Engle Framing Interactions to Foster Generative Learning: A Situative Explanation of Transfer in a Community of Learners Classroom , 2006 .

[36]  Yotam Hod,et al.  A group psychotherapeutic perspective on transforming participation in a learning community , 2014 .

[37]  Elizabeth S. Charles,et al.  When Teacher-Centered Instructors Are Assigned to Student-Centered Classrooms. , 2014 .

[38]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[39]  Yael Kali,et al.  Boundary breaking for interdisciplinary learning , 2015 .

[40]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Differential Participation During Science Conversations: The Interaction of Display Artifacts, Social Configurations, and Physical Arrangements , 1996, ICLS.

[41]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[42]  Jianwei Zhang,et al.  Fostering Sustained Knowledge Building through Metadiscourse Aided by the Idea Thread Mapper , 2015, CSCL.

[43]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9- and 10-year-olds , 2007 .

[44]  Gijsbert Erkens,et al.  Shared Epistemic Agency: An Empirical Study of an Emergent Construct , 2010 .